Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 August 28: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:36, 28 August 2012

< August 27	August 29 >

August 28

File:LMKeitt.jpg

Orphaned, NS (source is given, but image cannot be found there). —howcheng {chat} 01:03, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spotify criticism low payments to musicians.jpeg

Delete: Inaccurate POV that keeps getting inserted in the Spotify article.

Keep: It's an infographic illustrating a fact not simply a point of view, it's either accurate or inaccurate.

The original dispute by Jbenjos stated a "Graphic from a POV source that is also incredibly outdated." Implying that it was accurate at one time, but no longer?

As for it's accuracy, it is subject to debate since Spotify does not release payment stats and also because the issue is fairly complicated. This is the second version (see file history), the first version has Spotify's average payment at $0.0029 or 100% more than the current graphic. For more info, this is a decent breakdown: http://www.spotidj.com/spotifyroyalties.htm

Also, it wasn't the image that was removed and re-added, it was the entire Criticism section of Spotify. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uberholden (talk • contribs) 04:48, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

unused, unlikely to be used in productive way (as image is not notable and as result it is pure, extremely low quality OR and spam) Bulwersator (talk) 09:13, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Truth vs Hype still.jpg

Non-free screenshot from a TV documentary show, showing the program's host in some unspecified outdoors scene. Not the object of individual commentary in the article. Caption merely says it's a " still ... showing the presenter", but in that function it is obviously replaceable with a free photo of him. FUR claims it's used to show the "unique nature and identity of the show", but no explanation is given why this specific random shot is necessary for understanding it. (Note that there was previously another, just as random, shot of the same person in a different situation.) What this photo reveals about the "nature of the show" could easily be covered in text alone ("the host is sometimes shown talking in various rural outdoors settings" or something to that effect.) Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:37, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Clay Anderson spacewalkedit1.jpg

Unused in articles crop of File:STS-118 EVA3 Rick Mastracchio on a CETA cart.jpg - only in failed FP nomination (Wikipedia:Featured picture candidatesImage/Clay Anderson spacewalk) - is it enough to keep this file? Bulwersator (talk) 09:10, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coronado.gif

Extremely small, unused Bulwersator (talk) 09:25, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:David Harper LEED.jpg

Copy of a personal certificate of some professional achievement, uploaded for a biography. Independent of any copyright concerns for which it is currently tagged, using an image like this in an article would be inappropriate and unencyclopedic. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:57, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fut.Perf. ☼ Hi there, can you please clarify - this is not a "personal achievement" but rather a "Professional License" which validates the credentials. I believe this would, in fact, be more relevant than the Awards, all of which have been accepted, and are similar to other Architect Wiki pages. If I did not cite it, wouldn't someone else tag with "citation needed"? Thank you.Jenstew2012 (talk) 14:36, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 36: / Line 36: @@
 :<span class="plainlinks nourlexpansion lx">[[:File:David Harper LEED.jpg]] ([{{fullurl:File:David Harper LEED.jpg|action=delete&wpReason=%5B%5BWikipedia%3AFiles+for+deletion%2F2012+August+28%23File%3ADavid+Harper+LEED.jpg%5D%5D}} delete] | [[File talk:David Harper LEED.jpg|talk]] | [{{fullurl:File:David Harper LEED.jpg|action=history}} history] | [[Special:WhatLinksHere/File:David Harper LEED.jpg|links]] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page=File%3ADavid+Harper+LEED.jpg}} logs])</span> – uploaded by [[User talk:Jenstew2012#File:David Harper LEED.jpg listed for deletion|Jenstew2012]] (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:User talk:Jenstew2012|action=edit&preload=Template:Fdw_preload&editintro=Template:Fdw_editintro&section=new&create=Post+a+comment}} notify]</span> | [[Special:Contributions/Jenstew2012|contribs]] | [[Special:ListFiles/Jenstew2012|uploads]] | [[Special:Log/upload/Jenstew2012|upload log]]).
 Copy of a personal certificate of some professional achievement, uploaded for a biography. Independent of any copyright concerns for which it is currently tagged, using an image like this in an article would be inappropriate and unencyclopedic. [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 13:57, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
+<br />
+[[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] Hi there, can you please clarify - this is not a "personal achievement" but rather a "Professional License" which validates the credentials. I believe this would, in fact, be more relevant than the Awards, all of which have been accepted, and are similar to other Architect Wiki pages.  If I did not cite it, wouldn't someone else tag with "citation needed"?  Thank you.[[User:Jenstew2012|Jenstew2012]] ([[User talk:Jenstew2012|talk]]) 14:36, 28 August 2012 (UTC)