Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 August 28: Difference between revisions
Jenstew2012 (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
:Hi there, can you please clarify - this is not a "personal achievement" but rather a "Professional License" which validates the credentials. I believe this would, in fact, be more relevant than the Awards, all of which have been accepted, and are similar to other Architect Wiki pages. If I did not cite it, wouldn't someone else tag with "citation needed"? Thank you.[[User:Jenstew2012|Jenstew2012]] ([[User talk:Jenstew2012|talk]]) 14:36, 28 August 2012 (UTC) |
:Hi there, can you please clarify - this is not a "personal achievement" but rather a "Professional License" which validates the credentials. I believe this would, in fact, be more relevant than the Awards, all of which have been accepted, and are similar to other Architect Wiki pages. If I did not cite it, wouldn't someone else tag with "citation needed"? Thank you.[[User:Jenstew2012|Jenstew2012]] ([[User talk:Jenstew2012|talk]]) 14:36, 28 August 2012 (UTC) |
||
:: We cannot really use self-published private documents like this to back up factual claims, such as the claim that he hold this or that professional capacity. If such an item is really relevant for the biography, we'd need a reliable, published independent source for it, e.g. a newspaper report talking about it. If there is no such external coverage, the fact really doesn't belong in the article at all. [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 15:09, 28 August 2012 (UTC) |
:: We cannot really use self-published private documents like this to back up factual claims, such as the claim that he hold this or that professional capacity. If such an item is really relevant for the biography, we'd need a reliable, published independent source for it, e.g. a newspaper report talking about it. If there is no such external coverage, the fact really doesn't belong in the article at all. [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 15:09, 28 August 2012 (UTC) |
||
<br /> |
|||
[[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] OK I think I understand. |
|||
====[[:File:Csbf-logo sm.png]]==== |
====[[:File:Csbf-logo sm.png]]==== |
||
Revision as of 15:20, 28 August 2012
August 28
- File:LMKeitt.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by The_Mystery_Man (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Orphaned, NS (source is given, but image cannot be found there). —howcheng {chat} 01:03, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
- File:Spotify criticism low payments to musicians.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Uberholden (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Delete: Inaccurate POV that keeps getting inserted in the Spotify article.
Keep: It's an infographic illustrating a fact not simply a point of view, it's either accurate or inaccurate.
The original dispute by Jbenjos stated a "Graphic from a POV source that is also incredibly outdated." Implying that it was accurate at one time, but no longer?
As for it's accuracy, it is subject to debate since Spotify does not release payment stats and also because the issue is fairly complicated. This is the second version (see file history), the first version has Spotify's average payment at $0.0029 or 100% more than the current graphic. For more info, this is a decent breakdown: http://www.spotidj.com/spotifyroyalties.htm
Also, it wasn't the image that was removed and re-added, it was the entire Criticism section of Spotify. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uberholden (talk • contribs) 04:48, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
- unused, unlikely to be used in productive way (as image is not notable and as result it is pure, extremely low quality OR and spam) Bulwersator (talk) 09:13, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
- File:Truth vs Hype still.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by JasHne VB (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Non-free screenshot from a TV documentary show, showing the program's host in some unspecified outdoors scene. Not the object of individual commentary in the article. Caption merely says it's a " still ... showing the presenter", but in that function it is obviously replaceable with a free photo of him. FUR claims it's used to show the "unique nature and identity of the show", but no explanation is given why this specific random shot is necessary for understanding it. (Note that there was previously another, just as random, shot of the same person in a different situation.) What this photo reveals about the "nature of the show" could easily be covered in text alone ("the host is sometimes shown talking in various rural outdoors settings" or something to that effect.) Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:37, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
- File:Clay Anderson spacewalkedit1.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Instinct (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Unused in articles crop of File:STS-118 EVA3 Rick Mastracchio on a CETA cart.jpg - only in failed FP nomination (Wikipedia:Featured picture candidatesImage/Clay Anderson spacewalk) - is it enough to keep this file? Bulwersator (talk) 09:10, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
- File:Coronado.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by MFNickster (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Extremely small, unused Bulwersator (talk) 09:25, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
- File:David Harper LEED.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jenstew2012 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Copy of a personal certificate of some professional achievement, uploaded for a biography. Independent of any copyright concerns for which it is currently tagged, using an image like this in an article would be inappropriate and unencyclopedic. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:57, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
- Hi there, can you please clarify - this is not a "personal achievement" but rather a "Professional License" which validates the credentials. I believe this would, in fact, be more relevant than the Awards, all of which have been accepted, and are similar to other Architect Wiki pages. If I did not cite it, wouldn't someone else tag with "citation needed"? Thank you.Jenstew2012 (talk) 14:36, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
- We cannot really use self-published private documents like this to back up factual claims, such as the claim that he hold this or that professional capacity. If such an item is really relevant for the biography, we'd need a reliable, published independent source for it, e.g. a newspaper report talking about it. If there is no such external coverage, the fact really doesn't belong in the article at all. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:09, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Fut.Perf. ☼ OK I think I understand.
- File:Csbf-logo sm.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rsalter007 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Unused logo Bulwersator (talk) 14:44, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
