User talk:Abdulruff: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:40, 2 November 2012

AfD nomination of MIddle East: Shuttle Diplomacy of Bush (Dr.Abdul Ruff Colachal)

An editor has nominated MIddle East: Shuttle Diplomacy of Bush (Dr.Abdul Ruff Colachal), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MIddle East: Shuttle Diplomacy of Bush (Dr.Abdul Ruff Colachal) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 08:59, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Putin and Russian Presidency

An editor has nominated Putin and Russian Presidency, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Putin and Russian Presidency and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:59, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User talk:Abdulruff

User talk:Abdulruff, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Abdulruff and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User talk:Abdulruff during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Redfarmer (talk) 10:43, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Abdulruff

User:Abdulruff, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Abdulruff and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Abdulruff during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Redfarmer (talk) 12:34, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Original research

Wikipedia has a strict policy against publishing your original research for you. So far you've created several pages based on essays expressing your own beliefs. These pages have been deleted; that kind of contribution is not appropriate on Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:Introduction and Wikipedia:Five pillars to learn about Wikipedia if you are interested in the project. Mango juice^talk 04:27, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Abdul Ruff Colachal

A tag has been placed on Abdul Ruff Colachal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Dweller (talk) 11:45, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Portal:Contents, you will be blocked from editing. Church of emacs (Talk) 13:07, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

I noticed your submission in Articles for creation, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dr. Abdul Ruff. Thanks! It will be reviewed by a volunteer soon.

Before it can be added to Wikipedia, your submission should have references. All articles on Wikipedia should have inline, numbered references after facts, showing the 'reliable source' (a newspaper, book, etc.) where the information can be checked, so that all information is verifiable.

Here's a video tutorial - hit play, then right-click for "full screen".

Here's an example of how to add references:

Chzz is 98 years old.<ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref>

He likes tea.<ref> Smith, John. "[http://foonews.com/Article42 Interview with Chzz]", Foo News, 1 April 2010. Retrieved 2011-05-22. </ref>

== References ==

That makes the references automatically display as small numbers^[1] which will link to the details in the section titled == References == at the end. You can see that example in action here.

Please add references to your submission, which will be reviewed as soon as possible. See also, Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners. If you need any help, just put {{helpme}} at the end of this page, followed by a question or get into our live help chat chanel at #wikipedia-en-help ^connect.

Best, ChzzBot IV (talk) 09:58, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dr. Abdul Ruff.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk or via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! - Happysailor ^(Talk) 18:04, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dr. Abdul Ruff.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via live help, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Dalisays (talk) 13:59, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Abdul Ruff.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! France3470 (talk) 15:01, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Times report indicated that an agreement had been reached but the talks themselves would not take place before American presidential elections are held on November 6. The Times also painted a picture of secret communications and clandestine meetings between American and Iranian officials that have been ongoing for some time. Some are dismissing the Times report as an election ploy, particularly in light of the NSC denial. Many, including Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, argue that Tehran uses promises of negotiations to buy more time during which to complete its goal of creating nuclear weapons. That line of thought also suggests that injecting the negotiations story into the public debate just prior to elections could tip the balance in the neck-and-neck election toward President Obama, who is believed to be more inclined to engage the Iranians in negotiations than is Republican candidate Mitt Romney.

♥

Dr. Abdul Ruff, Specialist on State Terrorism; Educationalist; Chancellor-Founder of Centor for International Affairs(CIA); Former Indian university Teacher at JNU, Mysore University,CIEFL. Independent Analyst and commentator on global issues, including foreign policy, disarmament, climate change and ;Chronicler of Foreign occupations & Freedom movements(Palestine,Kashmir, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Xinjiang, Chechnya, etc); Hindus oppose him for his pro-Muslim views. Ruff believes that anti-Muslimism and anti-Islamism are more dangerous than "terrorism". Ruff believes that anti-Islamic forces & terrorists are using criminal elements for terrorizing the world and they in disguise are harming genuine interests of ordinary Muslims. Ruff also believes that global media today, even in Muslim nations, are controlled by anti-Islamic agencies.website:abdulruff.wordpress.com/References: 1. http://abdulruff.wordpress.com; 2. http://www.agoracosmopolitan.com; 3. http://www.kashmirwatch.com; 4.The Frontier Post; 5. Pakistan Observer (Dr. Abdul Ruff 16:28, 21 October 2012 (UTC)).

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/World War III.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Wywin (talk) 14:28, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

World War III

World War III or WW III is a term generally used by some international political commentators to describe the ongoing terror wars in Islamic world, also known as war on terror launched by USA under the presidency of hawkish G W Bush Jr following the Sept-11. The hawkish neoconservative elements in USA have justified the WW-III by saying that Islamic fundamentalists have attacked the all powerful and dictatorial USA.

Western powers are war mongers and liars. Generally, these anti-Islamic media nuts make news and create "history" and they decide what is World War and what isn't. Western lies are supported and promoted by the global fascist media (GFM).

But those who call the the so-called war on terror as WW III meant to destabilize Islamic Afghanistan and Pakistan, kill millions of Muslims, loot the resources from Islamic nations. They blame the Sept-11 as a US hoax and a gimmick to terrorize the world by showcasing its military prowess.

WW-III began in 2001 with the NATO terror attack on sovereign Afghanistan but it spread to Pakistan, Iraq, and Libya. Entire energy rich Mideast, except Israel, is under the grip of terror by the NATO terror syndicates.

Both USA and al its Mideast terror ally Israel have used the Sept-11 as a perfect occasion and useful pretext to increase the sale of their weapons and other terror goods.

Unlike other two world wars, the ongoing WW III is being waged by the western terrocracies against Islamic world , targeting lives and resources of global Muslims.

WW III has outsmarted the previous wars by prolonging the dirty terror war beyond 10 long years.

The western enemy of Islam by employing a well known CIA operative Osama bin Laden supplied by Saudi Arabia has jointly killed millions of Muslims, which is more than the causalities suffered during the WW I and WW II put together.

References: http://abdulruff.worldpress.com