Jump to content

User talk:Kippacat: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Kippacat (talk | contribs)
Kippacat (talk | contribs)
Line 40: Line 40:
Hi back at you!
Hi back at you!


I would be happy to learn how to edit and happy to make sure some of the science and medicine stuff is accurate. I will try to look at your talk page over the holidays - it gets crazy busy in the office this time of year. Can you suggest someplace to start so that I can work on my editing skills? is there a book that can explain how things work?
I would be happy to learn how to edit and happy to make sure some of the science and medicine stuff is accurate. I will try to look at your talk page over the holidays - it gets crazy busy in the office this time of year. Can you suggest someplace to start so that I can work on my editing skills? is there a book that can explain how things work? I have to say - I am not the most computer savvy person and just getting the Goldilocks article up was a GINORMOUS feat for me. But no hard feelings. You have to do what you have to do. - it is a good procedure and there will be better references eventually. I am presenting it at our national meeting in May. thanks for your feedback.
I have to say - I am not the most computer savvy person and just getting the Goldilocks article up was a GINORMOUS feat for me. But no hard feelings. You have to do what you have to do. - it is a good procedure and there will be better references eventually. I am presenting it at our national meeting in May. thanks for your feedback.


Heather kippacat[[User:Kippacat|Kippacat]] ([[User talk:Kippacat#top|talk]]) 00:57, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Heather kippacat[[User:Kippacat|Kippacat]] ([[User talk:Kippacat#top|talk]]) 00:57, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:57, 19 November 2012

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation

Goldilocks Mastectomy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kevin Rutherford (talk) 01:13, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there

Sorry to be the "bearer of bad news" in that I proposed deletion of your article. =( Thanks for your interest in Wikipedia, however. Might you be interested in learning a bit about how to edit? We'd love to have you stay. You could help improve topics such as mastectomy or breast cancer. (Lately I've been working on deep vein thrombosis, dengue fever, and malaria, FYI.) Breast cancer gets about 3600 hits a day: [1]. I could help guide you to get it up to WP:GA or WP:FA standards. We have a group of editors interested in medical topics where we discuss things at WT:MED. Anyhow, best wishes. And feel free to contact me at my talk page if you have any questions or concerns. Thanks again. Biosthmors (talk) 22:12, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Hi back at you!

I would be happy to learn how to edit and happy to make sure some of the science and medicine stuff is accurate. I will try to look at your talk page over the holidays - it gets crazy busy in the office this time of year. Can you suggest someplace to start so that I can work on my editing skills? is there a book that can explain how things work? I have to say - I am not the most computer savvy person and just getting the Goldilocks article up was a GINORMOUS feat for me. But no hard feelings. You have to do what you have to do. - it is a good procedure and there will be better references eventually. I am presenting it at our national meeting in May. thanks for your feedback.

Heather kippacatKippacat (talk) 00:57, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]