Talk:Discharge petition: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:06, 1 December 2012

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has not yet been assigned a subject. The options are: "Person", "People", "Place", "Thing", or "Events".

A fact from Discharge petition appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 February 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that a discharge petition can force a bill to be considered by the United States House of Representatives if the leadership tries to suppress it?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/February.

Wikipedia

Two notable spots for expansion in this article:

What was the discharge petition like from 1910-1931? Everything I've read simply says that it's "not comparable" to the modern one because it was too different.
How do discharge resolutions in the Senate work? I found those examples of senators signing 'em, but I can't find anything in the rules on them, or any commentary, or anything. Besides, with filibusters, they're pretty irrelevant anyway - if the leadership is that hardcore, the bill is going down anyway. Still, the formal rules would be nice, even if they don't actually matter.

Also, the last comment on analogues in parliamentary systems... I'm kinda out of my depth on that count, so if anyone who knows more on that wants to expand on that or offer a better link, feel free. SnowFire 02:45, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The last part

the last part seems to imply that in parlenent ministers in the same party are all required to vote the same way that looks like nonsense i know that isn't the topic of the article but all info within it still needs to be accurate 216.25.247.244 (talk) 17:18, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Globalize

Only American examples of discharge petitions are given in this article. The only global comparison made is to point out that there's no close analog in parliamentary systems. I'm not sure that discharge petitions can only be found in legislative assemblies in the United States. Perhaps that really is the case, but I'm guessing it's more likely the article is too US-centric. — Athelwulf ^[T]/_[C] 01:06, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 == The last part ==
 the last part seems to imply that in parlenent ministers in the same party are all required to vote the same way that looks like nonsense i know that isn't the topic of the article but all info within it still needs to be accurate [[Special:Contributions/216.25.247.244|216.25.247.244]] ([[User talk:216.25.247.244|talk]]) 17:18, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
+== Globalize ==
+Only American examples of discharge petitions are given in this article. The only global comparison made is to point out that there's no close analog in parliamentary systems. I'm not sure that discharge petitions can only be found in legislative assemblies in the United States. Perhaps that really is the case, but I'm guessing it's more likely the article is too US-centric. — <span style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Athelwulf|Athelwulf]]</span> <sup>[[User talk:Athelwulf|[T]]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Athelwulf|[C]]]</sub> 01:06, 1 December 2012 (UTC)