Talk:Pulamaipithan: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:38, 10 January 2013

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pulamaipithan article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

India: Tamil Nadu / Cinema / Classical Tamil Stub‑class Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tamil Nadu (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Classical Tamil workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment Stub‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

This stub got it all wrong!

There were two distinct persons - the writer Pudhumaippithan and the poet and song-writer Pulamaippithan. This stub is titled "Pulamaippithan" but talks about "Pudhumaippithan"! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.197.248.97 (talk) 07:39, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think you are thoroughly confused. This article is about Pulamaippithan and not Pudhumaippithan. I dont know on what basis you have made this comment. Even all the three references is also about Pulavar Pulamaippithan. You can verify yourself. Balaji (Let's talk) 14:20, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit What?

I just created an account on Wikipedia. It gave me several suggestions of articles that needed grammar editing, and this was one of them. There isn't much here, but I don't think that there's any problem with the grammar or anything that needs be edited. I don't think that stub articles shouldn't be tagged for grammar, 19 times out of 20-- if there's nothing to edit, why edit. If there's not much to edit, why play the editor.

I also wonder about the wisdom of asking people to edit grammar if they don't know anything about the subject-- it implies the whole thing is an idiot machine, if you know what I mean.

Also, I think that the user template of this screen is a little difficult-- I'm not sure that this head-line text or whatever is going to be displayed right. Editing my LibraryThing userpage was simpler. Obviously this is different in being more social than a personal page, but I don't see why the interface has to be difficult.

But if we could take down the flag on the top of the page that I don't think ought to be there, that would be a great start, anyway. --Kwiataprilensis (talk) 20:38, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 There were two distinct persons - the writer Pudhumaippithan and the poet and song-writer Pulamaippithan. This stub is titled "Pulamaippithan" but talks about "Pudhumaippithan"!  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/117.197.248.97|117.197.248.97]] ([[User talk:117.197.248.97|talk]]) 07:39, 10 March 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 :I think you are thoroughly confused. This article is about '''Pulamaippithan''' and not '''Pudhumaippithan'''. I dont know on what basis you have made this comment. Even all the three references is also about '''Pulavar Pulamaippithan'''. You can verify yourself.[[User:Balajijagadesh|<span style="background:#FFFFF0;color:#00CED1">''' Balaji '''</span>]] ([[User talk:Balajijagadesh|<font color="green">Let's talk</font>]]) 14:20, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
+==== Edit What? ====
+I just created an account on Wikipedia. It gave me several suggestions of articles that needed grammar editing, and this was one of them. There isn't much here, but I don't think that there's any problem with the grammar or anything that needs be edited. I don't think that stub articles shouldn't be tagged for grammar, 19 times out of 20-- if there's nothing to edit, why edit. If there's not much to edit, why play the editor.
+I also wonder about the wisdom of asking people to edit grammar if they don't know anything about the subject-- it implies the whole thing is an idiot machine, if you know what I mean.
+Also, I think that the user template of this screen is a little difficult-- I'm not sure that this head-line text or whatever is going to be displayed right. Editing my LibraryThing userpage was simpler. Obviously this is different in being more social than a personal page, but I don't see why the interface has to be difficult.
+But if we could take down the flag on the top of the page that I don't think ought to be there, that would be a great start, anyway. --[[User:Kwiataprilensis|Kwiataprilensis]] ([[User talk:Kwiataprilensis|talk]]) 20:38, 10 January 2013 (UTC)