Jump to content

Talk:Arthur Cotton: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m clean up using AWB (8432)
added B-class checklist
Line 3: Line 3:
|living=no
|living=no
|class=C
|class=C
|military-work-group=yes
|military-work-group=yes|military-priority=Mid
|listas=Cotton, Arthur Thomas
|listas=Cotton, Arthur Thomas
|military-priority=Mid
}}
}}
{{WikiProject Military history|class=C
{{WPMILHIST|class=C
|<!-- B-Class-1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations. -->
|British-task-force=yes
|B-Class-1=no
<!-- B-Class-2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. -->
|B-Class-2=yes
<!-- B-Class-3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. -->
|B-Class-3=yes
<!-- B-Class-4. It is free from major grammatical errors. -->
|B-Class-4=yes
<!-- B-Class-5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. -->
|B-Class-5=yes
|British-task-force=yes|Biography-task-force=yes
}}
}}
{{WikiProject India|class=C
{{WikiProject India|class=C

Revision as of 22:27, 25 January 2013

Wording

It would not be the first time he has done so, but sockpuppeteer By78 has introduced wording into this article in accordance with his anti-India bias with the justification that it is worded as such in an Economist article (that Arthur Cotton is still worshipped as a God). According to a [published biography] of him, he is an "honored, almost worshipped" entity. I consider his biography a more reliable and quotable source than a news publication which tangentially touches on this person. GSMR (talk) 06:06, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I concur. I don't think the entry should be changed without consensus. That is unless By78 wants his third block? Vedant (talk) 03:37, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article needs to be revamped

This article needs to be revamped. It is far too incoherent right now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarat Chandra M (talkcontribs) 02:36, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Then please propose suggestions or make the edits yourself. Blanking of an entire section is not the way to edit or improve an article. Thanks, Vedant (talk) 04:53, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]