Talk:The Mickey Mouse Club

A Minor Point

I'm about to create a page for the 8-episode MMC serial Adventure in Dairyland and therein lies the minor point. Online searches are split evenly between Adventure... and Adventures... as the title. I've decided to go with the singular. IMDb and one of the websites for the MMC (The Original MMC) use the singular. The latter site also has pictures of a comic book issued by the American Dairy Association in conjunction with the serial and it uses the singular. Finally, a family archive site for Chuck Keehne, a Walt Disney costume designer for over 20 years, also lists the serial with the singular (Filmography of Chuck Keehne). I'll be correcting the title throughout WP. JimVC3 (talk) 02:59, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

A major in-print source for the name, like the cover of the ADA comic book, is the best source. -- Zanimum (talk) 16:43, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

"B-class" assessment?

Before I begin, I should say that this issue is not regarding the article as it is written, but rather, the apparent lack of reliable sources for 90+% of the page. From skimming through the article, I don't have any objections to the content, but, to my knowledge, "B-class" status is not something that should be conferred casually – particularly since, when the article was assessed as "B-class" (on November 12, 2007), the article boasted a grand total of one reference, which was cited as a source for the names of the 1990s cast. As it is, in my opinion, the few sources cited honestly don't appear to even meet a respectable "C-class" criteria (it should be noted that an article's Quality assessment should not be confused with its Importance assessment). I'm not familiar with the assessing editor's work, but I'm a firm believer that assessments should be undertaken by qualified editors, lest assessment ratings become essentially meaningless. As I said – I don't have any problems with the content of the article (it appears to be well-written), and I believe sources could most likely be found to substantiate most (if not all) of what's here, but, until such time that they are referenced as inline citations within the text passage(s) of the article, I believe the page needs to be reassessed by a qualified assesser affiliated with the WikiProjects concerned (given the lack of sources I'd say the page falls squarely within the "start-class" category, but I'm leaving the "B" for now). I realize talk pages don't traditionally get a lot of traffic, so I'll leave this here for a week or two to give other editors an opportunity to reply. If this post fails to generate a discussion, then I'll take the next steps to alert the WikiProjects associated with the article in order to get the page properly assessed. --- Crakkerjakk (talk) 12:57, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Death of Ginny Tyler once a head Mouseketeer

I didn't see her name mentioned in this article. CBS is reporting she recently died and that she once was a head Mouseketeer.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.218.154.31 (talk) 20:07, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Info about her death is in Ginny Tyler. David1217 ^{What I've done} 05:19, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Lede

I can't wrap my head around "regular but ever-changing." To me, it's contradictory, like using "similar but different." -- Gyrofrog (talk) 04:33, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

You need a bigger head. Consider that "Tuesday" is *regular* but *ever-changing*, since Tuesday occurs quite regularly every week, but since no two Tuesdays are alike, each is different. Thus Tuesday is both regular and different. Get a bigger head.99.2.69.38 (talk) 02:35, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Roy?

There was an old guy mouseketeer named Roy in the 1950's series, introduced after Jimmy. Why no mention of him?99.2.69.38 (talk) 02:28, 11 February 2013 (UTC)