Template:Did you know nominations/International Association of Applied Linguistics: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m More standard alt hook formatting |
JoannaSerah (talk | contribs) Adding review: AGF approved. |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
*:This hook is probably better than the journal one - it's more central to the activity of the association, and it's shorter. The citation is in the "Activities" section, and it's the same Questia source that I posted the link to above. — '''''[[User:Mr. Stradivarius|<span style="color: #194D00; font-family: Palatino, Times, serif">Mr. Stradivarius</span>]]''''' <sup>[[User talk:Mr. Stradivarius|♪ talk ♪]]</sup> 16:04, 8 February 2013 (UTC) |
*:This hook is probably better than the journal one - it's more central to the activity of the association, and it's shorter. The citation is in the "Activities" section, and it's the same Questia source that I posted the link to above. — '''''[[User:Mr. Stradivarius|<span style="color: #194D00; font-family: Palatino, Times, serif">Mr. Stradivarius</span>]]''''' <sup>[[User talk:Mr. Stradivarius|♪ talk ♪]]</sup> 16:04, 8 February 2013 (UTC) |
||
*:''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/David Pendleton|David Pendleton]] ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3ADid_you_know_nominations%2FDavid_Pendleton&action=view&diff=537245044 diff]) — '''''[[User:Mr. Stradivarius|<span style="color: #194D00; font-family: Palatino, Times, serif">Mr. Stradivarius</span>]]''''' <sup>[[User talk:Mr. Stradivarius|♪ talk ♪]]</sup> 16:34, 8 February 2013 (UTC) |
*:''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/David Pendleton|David Pendleton]] ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3ADid_you_know_nominations%2FDavid_Pendleton&action=view&diff=537245044 diff]) — '''''[[User:Mr. Stradivarius|<span style="color: #194D00; font-family: Palatino, Times, serif">Mr. Stradivarius</span>]]''''' <sup>[[User talk:Mr. Stradivarius|♪ talk ♪]]</sup> 16:34, 8 February 2013 (UTC) |
||
:*[[File:Pictogram voting keep.svg|16px]] I do like '''Alt1''' better, also. QPQ done. New article, long enough and well cited. Hook info sourced with offline reference I don't have access to. But other info seems correct per the other cites I ''could'' check. So [[WP:AGF]]. I corrected some [[WP:OVERCITE|overciting]] on the page. Everything else looks fine, though. Thank you for your work. -- [[User:JoannaSerah|JoannaSerah]] ([[User talk:JoannaSerah|talk]]) 06:15, 17 February 2013 (UTC) |
|||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
||
Revision as of 06:15, 17 February 2013
International Association of Applied Linguistics
- ... that the journal Applied Linguistics is published by Oxford University Press, with help from the British, American and International Associations of Applied Linguistics?
Created by Mr. Stradivarius (talk). Self nom at 15:42, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Note - the citation for the hook is in the "publications" section, and the reference is available at Questia (p. 732) for people who have accounts there. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 15:50, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- ALT1 ... that the International Association of Applied Linguistics holds a World Congress every three years? — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 16:04, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- This hook is probably better than the journal one - it's more central to the activity of the association, and it's shorter. The citation is in the "Activities" section, and it's the same Questia source that I posted the link to above. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 16:04, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Reviewed: David Pendleton (diff) — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 16:34, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
I do like Alt1 better, also. QPQ done. New article, long enough and well cited. Hook info sourced with offline reference I don't have access to. But other info seems correct per the other cites I could check. So WP:AGF. I corrected some overciting on the page. Everything else looks fine, though. Thank you for your work. -- JoannaSerah (talk) 06:15, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
