Talk:Tuff TV: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 06:42, 18 February 2013

Television Stub‑class

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

KKYK/KMYA

I don't think KMYA is a Tuff TV affiliate anymore. From what I heard, it was airing some African music network or something and is now slated to join MeTV. But I'm not sure of that, so I don't want to change the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TripEricson (talk • contribs) 22:33, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of FTA Satellite broadcast on AMC9 (83W)

Tuff TV, as well as PBJ and RTV are broadcast FTA on the AMC9 satellite at 83.0°W but this isn't mentioned. C-band is mentioned for RTV in the article on Luken. Anybody know why?

24.207.196.213 (talk) 03:28, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested Move

It has been proposed in this section that Tuff TV be renamed and moved to TUFF TV.

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

Tuff TV → TUFF TV – Requesting move to TUFF TV with all caps. TUFF TV is the correct capitalization for the network. Sjmckeeman (talk) 22:29, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting move to TUFF TV with all caps. TUFF TV is the correct capitalization for the network.

Sam McKeeman, VP Marketing & Brand Development

Oppose the WP:MOSTM and WP:ALLCAPS are clear on cases like this.--174.93.160.57 (talk) 22:45, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per MOS:TM. You're entitled to style the name however you'd like, but we stick to regular English-language conventions. --BDD (talk) 16:13, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Approve per MOS:TM. MAV TV is a competitor and has their page name in all caps. Sjmckeeman (talk) 23:15, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Approve per MOS:TM. So do we take a vote? How does this work? 50.73.82.60 (talk) 22:51, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Not so fast; Sjmckeeman (talk · contribs) and 50.73.82.60 (talk · contribs), both promotional, WP:SPA and WP:COI accounts, are the same user [1]. 99.136.254.88 (talk) 00:19, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Point being...? How do I get this changed? 174.49.70.62 (talk) 21:23, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Citing a gideline to support a change (WP:MOSTM) when in fact it is clearly against the change is a bad start and that argument will be rejected for obvious reasons. The guideline calls for standard capitalization and formatting neither of which are the case here. To be frank the only way to get this moved would be to make a better case and to cite a guideline that actually supports your position.--174.93.160.57 (talk) 06:42, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removal?

A whole bunch of cited material was just removed from this page, including every reference to Luken Communications, which owns 2/3 of Tuff TV and operates much of the network out of its Chattanooga offices (in conjunction with an office in Atlanta). I tried to revert the changes, but it says there are conflicting edits. Can someone get the proper information back on the page? TripEricson (talk) 00:08, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 **Not so fast; {{user|Sjmckeeman}} and {{user|50.73.82.60}}, both promotional, [[WP:SPA]] and [[WP:COI]] accounts, are the same user [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tuff_TV&diff=prev&oldid=536590285]. [[Special:Contributions/99.136.254.88|99.136.254.88]] ([[User talk:99.136.254.88|talk]]) 00:19, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
 **Point being...? How do I get this changed? [[Special:Contributions/174.49.70.62|174.49.70.62]] ([[User talk:174.49.70.62|talk]]) 21:23, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
+***Citing a gideline to support a change  ([[WP:MOSTM]]) when in fact it is clearly against the change is a bad start and that argument will be rejected for obvious reasons. The guideline calls for standard capitalization and formatting neither of which are the case here. To be frank the only way to get this moved would be to make a better case and to cite a guideline that actually supports your position.--[[Special:Contributions/174.93.160.57|174.93.160.57]] ([[User talk:174.93.160.57|talk]]) 06:42, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
 == Removal? ==