User talk:Lstudholme

Welcome!

Hello, Lstudholme, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Nasty and Sinister, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 99.12.243.171 (talk) 20:16, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nasty and Sinister

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nasty and Sinister requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. 99.12.243.171 (talk) 20:16, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Lstudholme, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Lstudholme! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 03:00, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Eileen Daly

You edit on Eileen Daly has been reverted as most of the text is irrelevant to the article and reads like a biography written by the subject herself. The article is about Eileen Daly not every film she has starred in. If any of the films etc are note worthy, they will already have their own Wikipedia article on them. Also, I note you (using this user name and other accounts, along with numerous IP addresses) remove any reference to Daly's well known and published history as an "adult star" throughout the late 70's and 80's, please refrain from doing so as it is relevant to the article.

Urgederin (talk) 20:27, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

what is your obsession/problem with eileen daly???

There is no obsession or problem - the issue is that you remove references to her history as a porn star and obsessively monitor this article to do so as if you own it. It isn't a secret, but is treated as such on this article because you remove it. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a collection of self written biographies that omits anything the subjects don't like.

Urgederin (talk) 21:08, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

The reason is it removed is because it is inaccurate, she was not in porn in the late 70's. She was not born and has never lived in southwark, shes not 52. And no, i'm not eileen daly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.126.24.59 (talk) 21:14, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Google shows otherwise. Daly's co-star Linday Honey/Ben Dover confirms when he filmed scenes with her for hardcore European magazines. There are plenty of websites which feature Daly in pornographic video and stills. You seem to be on a one man/woman crusade to remove any reference to Daly's history.

Urgederin (talk) 21:18, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

April 2013

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Eileen Daly. Thank you. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 19:56, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
what unreferenced information was that?