Talk:European Esperanto Union: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Contested deletion: new section |
|||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... it's an existing association, with [http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&as_q=&as_epq=European+Esperanto+Union&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_nlo=&as_nhi=&lr=&cr=&as_qdr=all&as_sitesearch=&as_occt=any&safe=images&tbs=&as_filetype=&as_rights= about 110 000 GHits] for the name itself. I think [[WP:AfD]] would be a better place to discuss this article. --[[User:Shirt58|Shirt58]] ([[User talk:Shirt58|talk]]) 14:08, 14 May 2013 (UTC) |
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... it's an existing association, with [http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&as_q=&as_epq=European+Esperanto+Union&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_nlo=&as_nhi=&lr=&cr=&as_qdr=all&as_sitesearch=&as_occt=any&safe=images&tbs=&as_filetype=&as_rights= about 110 000 GHits] for the name itself. I think [[WP:AfD]] would be a better place to discuss this article. --[[User:Shirt58|Shirt58]] ([[User talk:Shirt58|talk]]) 14:08, 14 May 2013 (UTC) |
||
*Google hit counts are meaningless numbers. In this case only 274 hits are actually viewable, and many are duplicates or otherwise of little value. [[Special:Contributions/86.128.5.222|86.128.5.222]] ([[User talk:86.128.5.222|talk]]) 20:12, 14 May 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Contested deletion == |
== Contested deletion == |
Revision as of 20:12, 14 May 2013
Constructed languages: Esperanto Unassessed | |||||||||||||
|
European Union Unassessed (inactive) | |||||||
|
Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... it's an existing association, with about 110 000 GHits for the name itself. I think WP:AfD would be a better place to discuss this article. --Shirt58 (talk) 14:08, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
- Google hit counts are meaningless numbers. In this case only 274 hits are actually viewable, and many are duplicates or otherwise of little value. 86.128.5.222 (talk) 20:12, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because...it should go through the normal AfD process. I can find at least one addition reliable source[1] that suggests that it might meet WP:GNG. I think we should take some time to find out if there are additional sources, especially non-English sources. A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 15:01, 14 May 2013 (UTC)