User talk:IPhonehurricane95

I award thee the Barnstar of Diligence

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		You have continued your pursuit in improving the Hurricane Gilbert article despite a setback (GAN failure), which many editors on here might not have done. It is an important storm article to improve. I therefore award you the Barnstar of Diligence, hoping the article can be improved/raised to GA status in the near future. Thegreatdr (talk) 23:33, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! JG ^{(edits · sandbox)} 00:04, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

See Also section advice

Per Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Layout#See_also_section, the See Also section is mainly meant for incomplete articles which certain wikilinks are not included within the article body yet, but would be if it were a GA. It does mention that it is not a place for wikilinks already included within the article above. Someone clarified me on this a few years back. Now you know. Thegreatdr (talk) 01:04, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Note

Before seding an article to GAN that you have not worked on, please notify the primary author. Thank you. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 23:35, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Which article did he do so for? He's been working on the Gilbert article. Thegreatdr (talk) 00:15, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Hurricane Hernan (1996). YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 00:34, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

GAN

Hi Jeffrey! I just finished reviewing Hurricane Gilbert and I have some suggestions for you. However, I was wondering if I could first do a thorough copyedit myself. If not, I can post all of my copyediting suggestions for you too along with the rest of the review. It's no trouble either way. Thanks for all your great work! Best, Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 04:30, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Hey

Hey man, how have you been doing? I noticed you haven't been editing much. I just wanted to make sure everything is alright. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 13:07, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Tropical Storm Ignacio(1991)

While this article is not terrible, it is not at the right location and while is somewhat notable and an okay idea, it is a little on the short side not to mention the fact that they are tons of more important storms without articles. I suggest you work on more important storm like Pacific typhoons or storms in the Southern Hemisphere as they are many more storms with good info. as well as many key storms in those basins that do not have pages. Thank you. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 01:30, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, I'm out of ideas for other storms (BTW, I can't seem to find a Southern Hemisphere tropical cyclone) iPhoneHurricane95 02:50, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:Tropical Storm Vera (1989)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Begonia Brandbygeana (talk) 12:23, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Hurricane Ramon

I deleted the redirect, go for it. --Golbez (talk) 02:33, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

 Done iPhoneHurricane95 18:25, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Recent articles

Hey there JG (can I still call you that?). I was wondering if you thought to do more important articles ever? Most of the articles you've made in the past few days are of very marginal notability, and most previously had articles and were merged for a reason. You used to do WPAC articles on some pretty key storms. Is there a reason you stopped that? Hope all is well, cheers. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:25, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Re: Raymond '83

I see that Raymond of 1983 was merged due to there being not enough info. However, I had the ability to create a sandbox of Raymond and I found as much info as I can, using this and this. Here's the sandbox. iPhoneHurricane95 22:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Mind if I edit your sandbox to see if it is actually worth an article? YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 22:39, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Sure. iPhoneHurricane95 22:39, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

You have a tendency to include too much trivial information though, like Hurricane Charley (1980). You don't have to include every factoid in an article. Here are some examples.

• "predicted that the main island would feel the effects of rain, strong winds, and high surf on October 15" - every storm produces rain, winds, and high surf along the coast.
• "Forecasters say that Raymond is larger than the the hurricane that pounded the island of Kauai two days before Thanksgiving the previous year and caused $234 million (1982 USD)." - how is this relevant to Raymond? Was its size ultimately important? No need to mention the bits about Iwa. It'd be one thing if it was the first storm since then, but Gil 83 has that honour.
• "A National Weather Service (NWS) assistant stated that Raymond may be "one of the most powerful hurricanes ever to enter this part of the Pacific"." - how is this preparations? And why is it important? Since it's not true. Ioke is the strongest storm in the CPAC. Even if it was at the time, that was 30 years ago, not exactly that relevant anymore.
• "Civil defense officials urged Hawaiian residents to begin preparing for the worst." - why is this worth mentioning? That's pretty typical for hurricanes.
• "A hurricane watch was issued for all islands on October 14" - you mentioned that earlier.
• "Meteorologists say that Raymond is capable of spawning thunderstorms before any actual arrival at a landmass. Moving at a speed of 15 mph (24 km/h), meteorologists predicted that Raymond was to reach the islands in about three days." - and?

That's only the preparations, and it shows how bloated the article is. It looks like a decent length, but when you look at the actual content, it's pretty scant. I would reconsider making the Raymond article, personally, since there is little additional good information than what is in the season section. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:54, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

JG, I did you a favor and did an extensive copyedit. The above should not apply anymore. I am leaning toward a Raymond article atm, but I am still not 100% sure as I still need to see how an article-less season section would look like. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 03:08, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

'Abandoned' template documentation subpage

Hi, could you please delete (or otherwise modify) User:IPhonehurricane95/sandbox/Template:Hurricane Same Name/doc. It appears to be 'unused', and is being filed in Category:Documentation subpages without corresponding pages, which I am attempting to clean up. Thanks. Revent (talk) 20:29, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Orlene '92

[1]. iPhoneHurricane95 01:35, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

A helicopter crashed unofficially as a result of Orlene. iPhoneHurricane95 01:55, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

All seven died in the helicrash. Is that enough? iPhoneHurricane95 15:59, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Rollback request

Seriously, I'd advise you do some reversions before you ask for the rollback permission again. It's clear they're not going to give it to you. Make about 50 to 100 revisions and maybe they'll give it to you next time. NintendoFan (Talk, Contribs) 19:57, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Blocked

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

IPhonehurricane95 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am extremely sorry for creating sockpuppets, I was just bored. I swear to god that the sockpuppeteering shit won't ever happen again. Im not kidding. I apologize very much. May someone unblock me and also my doppelgänger CaliforniaHurricane25? :-)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I am extremely sorry for creating sockpuppets, I was just bored. I swear to god that the sockpuppeteering shit won't ever happen again. Im not kidding. I apologize very much. May someone unblock me and also my doppelgänger CaliforniaHurricane25? :-) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am extremely sorry for creating sockpuppets, I was just bored. I swear to god that the sockpuppeteering shit won't ever happen again. Im not kidding. I apologize very much. May someone unblock me and also my doppelgänger CaliforniaHurricane25? :-) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am extremely sorry for creating sockpuppets, I was just bored. I swear to god that the sockpuppeteering shit won't ever happen again. Im not kidding. I apologize very much. May someone unblock me and also my doppelgänger CaliforniaHurricane25? :-) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}