User talk:EncMstr

TUSC token 9971e50bd95eab9f57319ec9a0d97086

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account where I changed my password!

Standard diving dress

Any particular reason for your revert? I'm not seeing the problem here. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:39, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

You are right: I didn't notice there were consecutive edits, all but the last seemed valid. I think I corrected it? Does the IP's last edit seem spammy to you as well? —EncMstr (talk) 18:50, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

OK, I'd agree with that.

The course details might be un-spammmy if it added anything to the article. With a bit of detail, even possibly just a URL, it might be a really good addition. As it is though it's just a content-free namecheck and that's definitely not what we want. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:59, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Special Barnstar
		For the hard work that it must have taken to prepare List of waterfalls in Oregon from scratch last year, and for working on other Oregon-related lists. Jsayre64 (talk) 21:52, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

James P. Hogan reversion

Sorry I didn't explain on the article but the information I deleted was duplicated. Star Child and Martian Knightlife aren't really novels (Star Child collects four linked short stories while Martian Knightlife collects two novellas with the same lead character) so in an earlier edit I put them in the collections section along with contents information. Would it be OK to restore my edit?--Wyvern Rex. (talk) 09:05, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Of course. I didn't look at the overall context—only that there was valid material removed without any explanation. Please use the edit summary to avoid misunderstandings. Thanks! —EncMstr (talk) 10:13, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

I've got a question relating to JPH. Apparently, in 2010-11 there was supposed to be a final collection of his coming out with Hadley Rille publishers but there's no word on its release. Here's what I know:

• There were supposed to be five reprints. The titles were not disclosed but "The Colonising of Tharle", "Jailhouse Rock", "Murphy's War", "Escape" and the expanded version of "Leapfrog" hadn't been collected elsewhere.
• In addition, five new stories were planned. No details have been disclosed.
• No "non-fiction" articles were mentioned.

Do you know anything else about this?--Wyvern Rex. (talk) 13:35, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Deletion assistance

 Done —EncMstr (talk) 20:54, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

It's not urgent, but could you help me by either deleting, or advising me how best to propose deleting, the following article? – RiverPlace (MAX station). I only recently discovered that this article exists, even though it was created in 2006 (!), in relation to a light rail line that did not even begin to be under construction until 2011 and is not due to open until 2015. It's a completely unreferenced, four-sentence stub, and renaming it doesn't make sense, because TriMet no longer has any plans for a RiverPlace station on the Milwaukie MAX line. This stub never should been created (at such an early stage in the planning for the MAX line) in the first place, and I see no reason to keep the "article" on Wikipedia, but I cannot find an appropriate criterion at WP:CSD for a speedy deletion. Must this case really go through a deletion discussion? (You can answer on this page, which I'll watchlist.) SJ Morg (talk) 11:15, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

WP:FUTURE is the applicable reason, but for CSD, it is probably best captured in CSD#A7: No indication of importance. I have deleted it on that basis. Thanks! —EncMstr (talk) 20:54, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. I considered tagging it with CSD#A7, but I wasn't sure, since A7 lists specific (but broad) subject areas, and this subject – a proposed structure – did not appear to fit under any of them. However, I figured A7 is probably intended to cover such cases, and your application of it supports that notion. Thanks again. SJ Morg (talk) 07:21, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, EncMstr. You have new messages at Gtwfan52's talk page.
Message added 02:49, 30 July 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Gtwfan52 (talk) 02:49, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Inappropriate Templates?

Hi EncMstr, I just got a weird message from you and I think you have the wrong guy — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.1.64.82 (talk) 17:28, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

User:MeltzerSeltzer

We're having some issues with linkspamming and other less than ideal behaviors from a few american masters linked accounts. You only blocked this account for three hours, and given the ongoing nature of the issue. Would you mind extending it to indefinite? NativeForeigner ^Talk 18:50, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Where else is there related linkspamming?

I made the block short to get their attention. It seems like there is good faith to his/her edits and some articles might have been helped if considered in isolation. I had intended to reevaluate their intent when the block expires. If they resume, then yes, a long term block would follow. —EncMstr (talk) 18:55, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Winston, Oregon may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * [[Josh Bidwell]], professional football player, [[1999 NFL Draft]], [[punter]- [[Green Bay Packers]], [[Tampa Bay Buccaneers]],[[2006 Pro Bowl]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:04, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Account soon to be blocked?

Does this mean that if I don't make an account soon I can't access wikipedia from this computer/IP address? This is my work computer but I use wikipedia regularly, so the edits that "don't appear to be in good faith" could have been from another user with the same IP, but I clicked the link and I didn't see anything inappropriate.