Jump to content

User talk:Spalagdama: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Final warning: Vandalism on Apraca. (TW)
Spalagdama (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 36: Line 36:


:@Thomas.W: Sour grapes. Not a "technicality" might I add. And not me; this is actually best described as you being temporarily aquitted after you owned up to your lies, prior to an investigation showing them as just that. You filed an erroneous report, falsely labeled my protection of wikipedia content i.e. reversion of khestwol's repetitive valdalism, as "unsourced (and/or deliberately false) and biased edits", tried to summon reinforcements (which never arrived), and in the end, had to admit to your fabrications in order to avoid facing further humiliation. Now stop being obsessive, snooping in on everything I do (in hopes of twisting it around) and get a life while you're at it. Enough said.[[User:Spalagdama|Spalagdama]] ([[User talk:Spalagdama#top|talk]]) 15:49, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
:@Thomas.W: Sour grapes. Not a "technicality" might I add. And not me; this is actually best described as you being temporarily aquitted after you owned up to your lies, prior to an investigation showing them as just that. You filed an erroneous report, falsely labeled my protection of wikipedia content i.e. reversion of khestwol's repetitive valdalism, as "unsourced (and/or deliberately false) and biased edits", tried to summon reinforcements (which never arrived), and in the end, had to admit to your fabrications in order to avoid facing further humiliation. Now stop being obsessive, snooping in on everything I do (in hopes of twisting it around) and get a life while you're at it. Enough said.[[User:Spalagdama|Spalagdama]] ([[User talk:Spalagdama#top|talk]]) 15:49, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

==[[WP:NPA]] warning==
You made a mistake and said something that wasn't so, on my page; and you think [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bishonen&diff=prev&oldid=570720260 this] is the appropriate comment for you to make about it? I've had about enough of your bile and lousy manners on my page. Don't post there again. And if you talk to Thomas.W (or anybody else) like that again on any page, I'll block you for personal attacks. Or, worse, if you talk to anybody the way you do to Thomas immediately above. Just stop it. [''Crossposted from my page to make sure you see it.''.] [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] | [[User talk:Bishonen|talk]] 20:55, 29 August 2013 (UTC).

::::::@Bishonen My comment wasn't in reference to the "mistake" you describe, it was in response to your atrociously rude friend Thomas. W making personal attacks against me (while conversing with you), which appears to have gone over your head...the discerning amongst readers will be able to see exactly who was/is making "personal attacks", stalking and misrepresenting others. Like I said above, before disengaging, that with logic such as this, who can even argue. If you don't want me posting on your page, kindly do not post on mine either. And if that didn't register let me put it this way, you and your buddy especially, need to leave me alone." [''Crossposted to your page to make sure I am not misrepresented.''.][[User:Spalagdama|Spalagdama]] ([[User talk:Spalagdama#top|talk]]) 04:18, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

== September 2013 ==
[[Image:Ambox warning pn.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please stop adding [[Wikipedia:Citing sources|unsourced]] content, as you did to [[:Apraca]]. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiability]]. If you continue to do so, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. <!-- Template:uw-unsourced3 --> ''Don't start this all over again, the tolerance level is lower this time...'' [[User:Thomas.W|<font face="Comic Sans MS" color="#164D0B">'''Thomas.W'''</font>]] [[User talk:Thomas.W|<font face="Comic Sans MS" color="#164D0B"><sup><small>'''talk to me'''</small></sup></font>]] 11:01, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=Stop icon]] This is your '''last warning'''. The next time you [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] Wikipedia, as you did at [[:Apraca]], you may be '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]] without further notice'''. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism4 --> [[User:Thomas.W|<font face="Comic Sans MS" color="#164D0B">'''Thomas.W'''</font>]] [[User talk:Thomas.W|<font face="Comic Sans MS" color="#164D0B"><sup><small>'''talk to me'''</small></sup></font>]] 12:40, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:52, 13 September 2013

Welcome!

Hello, Spalagdama, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! JohnCD (talk) 17:55, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I just wanted to let you know that I've had to fix or undo one of your recent changes, due to a bug in the software you're using to edit. This is through no fault of your own; there are a few known bugs (link to bug tracking) in the Visual Editor software that you're using. If you'd like, please feel free to report this at the feedback page, otherwise, feel free to try the edit again and see if it works.

The VisualEditor software is a new gadget that is being tested with around half of randomly selected new accounts. Its purpose is to allow for a visual editing environment, or a WYSIWYG environment, for editing using MediaWiki markup, the technical and complicated old version of editing Wikipedia and similar sites. The VisualEditor test is only being enabled in articles and on userpages at this time. For more information, see the project page. Happy editing! JohnCD (talk) 17:55, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Information icon Hello, I'm Thomas.W. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Paratarajas, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Thomas.W talk to me 18:47, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did to Gandhara, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Thomas.W talk to me 18:49, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Gondophares. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thomas.W talk to me 19:10, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Gandapur, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Thomas.W talk to me 19:14, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign your posts on talkpages

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Bishonen | talk 21:59, 14 August 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Dispute between you and Thomas W.

I unblocked you when Thomas told me that his report to me was erroneous. Other than that, I'm not really taking any position in this one way or the other. Daniel Case (talk) 20:09, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Spalagdama: Which best can be described as you being temporarily aquitted because of a technicality, that is me retracting a report to Daniel Case only because you were lucky enough to make a revert a minute or two before the IP was blocked, instead of just after. My SPI-report stands, and also my assessment that this is a clear case of WP:DUCK. And I would like to point out that this is not a dispute between two editors but a clear case of systematically making unsourced (and/or deliberately false) and biased edits, and abusing multiple accounts while doing it. Thomas.W talk to me 20:21, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
@Thomas.W: Sour grapes. Not a "technicality" might I add. And not me; this is actually best described as you being temporarily aquitted after you owned up to your lies, prior to an investigation showing them as just that. You filed an erroneous report, falsely labeled my protection of wikipedia content i.e. reversion of khestwol's repetitive valdalism, as "unsourced (and/or deliberately false) and biased edits", tried to summon reinforcements (which never arrived), and in the end, had to admit to your fabrications in order to avoid facing further humiliation. Now stop being obsessive, snooping in on everything I do (in hopes of twisting it around) and get a life while you're at it. Enough said.Spalagdama (talk) 15:49, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]