User talk:94.228.193.11: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:18, 25 September 2013

July 2011

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at User talk:Ymblanter, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Personal attacks such as what you posted on the editor's talk page will NOT be tolerated!! Russavia ^{Let's dialogue} 17:30, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 Hours for Repeated Vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. FASTILY ^(TALK) 19:22, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Chulpan Khamatova, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Chulpan Khamatova was changed by 94.228.193.11 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.938398 on 2011-08-20T19:39:18+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:39, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Chang Ung with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Calabe1992 (talk) 18:22, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Saparmurat Niyazov, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Saparmurat Niyazov was changed by 94.228.193.11 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.880493 on 2012-06-30T16:45:59+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:46, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:01, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stop it.

Please stop using Wikipedia to make racist political statements. If you do not stop yourself, someone will stop you instead. --Jayron32 19:03, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 19:04, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 21:05, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

94.228.193.11 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I continue to be racist in life but promise not to attack using Wiki again. And in Chizhevsky article that was NOT abuse 94.228.193.11 (talk) 21:09, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I continue to be racist in life but promise not to attack using Wiki again. And in Chizhevsky article that was NOT abuse [[Special:Contributions/94.228.193.11|94.228.193.11]] ([[User talk:94.228.193.11#top|talk]]) 21:09, 25 September 2013 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I continue to be racist in life but promise not to attack using Wiki again. And in Chizhevsky article that was NOT abuse [[Special:Contributions/94.228.193.11|94.228.193.11]] ([[User talk:94.228.193.11#top|talk]]) 21:09, 25 September 2013 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I continue to be racist in life but promise not to attack using Wiki again. And in Chizhevsky article that was NOT abuse [[Special:Contributions/94.228.193.11|94.228.193.11]] ([[User talk:94.228.193.11#top|talk]]) 21:09, 25 September 2013 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Would you consider that this [1] comment is appropriate here?--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:16, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
No, sir94.228.193.11 (talk) 21:18, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 21:16, 25 September 2013 edit Anthony Bradbury (talk \| contribs) 25,053 edits would you agree that this is a racist submission? ← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:18, 25 September 2013 edit undo 94.228.193.11 (talk) →September 2013 Next edit →
Line 42:		Line 42:

	Would you consider that this [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=574513584] comment is appropriate here?--<font color="Red">[[User:Anthony Bradbury\|'''Anthony Bradbury''']]</font><sup><font color="Black">[[User talk:Anthony.bradbury\|"talk"]]</font></sup> 21:16, 25 September 2013 (UTC)		Would you consider that this [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=574513584] comment is appropriate here?--<font color="Red">[[User:Anthony Bradbury\|'''Anthony Bradbury''']]</font><sup><font color="Black">[[User talk:Anthony.bradbury\|"talk"]]</font></sup> 21:16, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
			No, sir[[Special:Contributions/94.228.193.11\|94.228.193.11]] ([[User talk:94.228.193.11#top\|talk]]) 21:18, 25 September 2013 (UTC)