Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Science: Difference between revisions
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Science/Archive 3) (bot |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
All, |
All, |
||
I've proposed a reorganization of [[Citizen science]] on its talk page. As this is my first experiment in reorganizing a page, I'm not sure of the process, whether a single page reorg requires a full [[WP:RFC]]. Since the page in question is listed on its talk page as affiliated with this Project, I thought I'd at least point to that discussion from here, so that folks here are aware. Please direct any comments on the reorg of the page to that talk page, and any advice on the process to my talk page. Thanks [[User:1bandsaw|1bandsaw]] ([[User talk:1bandsaw|talk]]) 20:43, 12 December 2013 (UTC) |
I've proposed a reorganization of [[Citizen science]] on its talk page. As this is my first experiment in reorganizing a page, I'm not sure of the process, whether a single page reorg requires a full [[WP:RFC]]. Since the page in question is listed on its talk page as affiliated with this Project, I thought I'd at least point to that discussion from here, so that folks here are aware. Please direct any comments on the reorg of the page to that talk page, and any advice on the process to my talk page. Thanks [[User:1bandsaw|1bandsaw]] ([[User talk:1bandsaw|talk]]) 20:43, 12 December 2013 (UTC) |
||
=="{{noredirect|Aeronautics}}"== |
|||
FYI, {{la|aeronautics}} has been proposed to be merged into [[aviation]], see [[talk:aviation]] -- [[Special:Contributions/65.94.78.9|65.94.78.9]] ([[User talk:65.94.78.9|talk]]) 23:25, 23 December 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 23:25, 23 December 2013
| This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Science and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8Auto-archiving period: 90 days  |
Template:Outline of knowledge coverage
 | Science Project‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
The Science WikiProject is now seven years old! Please help to:
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
Blog critiquing Wikipedia
Just thought I'd alert you to this new blog, En.wiki Bad Science, which critiques some of poorly written science articles on Wikipedia. They go into a very detailed dissection of articles which really leads to larger questions of how articles are pieced together from an assortment of sources, how there is original research even just interpreting those references and the wisdom of having a Good Article review from individuals who have no knowledge of the subjects they are reviewing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:21, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
- S/he actually has some good points, worth reading. Nevermind a few hyperbolic expressions - say, all and every admins don't care (we do care), and such; all too normal when somewhat upset - Nabla (talk) 00:36, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
International Year of Crystallography 2014
UNESCO proclaimed the "International Year of Crystallography 2014". It can be an important opportunity for wikipedians to contribute in an international initiative, spreading the scientific knowledge, in particular about crystallography.
These are my proposals to participate to this event:
- to create the page International Year of Crystallography 2014 in all the Wikipedias
- to improve substantially during this year the page Crystallography, Crystal and other important pages about crystallography, in all the Wikipedias
- to create and translate pages related to crystallography
- to create a Portal:Crystallography
- to organize better the pictures in commons:Category:Crystallography and encourage the creation of new pictures
- to contact all the Wikipedias, other Wikimedia projects, Wikimedia Foundation and the organizing committee of the "International Year of Crystallography 2014" (here you can see their contacts) to communicate our adhesion to this initiative.
Do you have any other opinion or suggestion? --Daniele Pugliesi (talk) 10:10, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Portal technology for featured candidacy
I've nominated Portal:Technology for featured candidacy. Comments would be appreciated, at Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:Technology. — Cirt (talk) 17:37, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deletion discussion for
Comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2013_November_26#Category:Solitary_Animals for the deletion of a category about animal species that don't exhibit gregarious behaviour. Diego (talk) 08:12, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Proposed page reorganization
All, I've proposed a reorganization of Citizen science on its talk page. As this is my first experiment in reorganizing a page, I'm not sure of the process, whether a single page reorg requires a full WP:RFC. Since the page in question is listed on its talk page as affiliated with this Project, I thought I'd at least point to that discussion from here, so that folks here are aware. Please direct any comments on the reorg of the page to that talk page, and any advice on the process to my talk page. Thanks 1bandsaw (talk) 20:43, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
FYI, Aeronautics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) has been proposed to be merged into aviation, see talk:aviation -- 65.94.78.9 (talk) 23:25, 23 December 2013 (UTC)