Jump to content

Talk:Saki (manga): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
콩가루 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Tag: Mobile edit
Line 25: Line 25:
== saki is Yuri anime? ==
== saki is Yuri anime? ==
I found the source that Saki (TV) is yuri animation at AnimeNewsNetwork. [https://www.animenewsnetwork.com/encyclopedia/anime.php?id=10527] but I don't know if I can add cat:Yuri. Please help me. --[[User:콩가루|콩가루]] ([[User talk:콩가루|talk]]) 14:11, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
I found the source that Saki (TV) is yuri animation at AnimeNewsNetwork. [https://www.animenewsnetwork.com/encyclopedia/anime.php?id=10527] but I don't know if I can add cat:Yuri. Please help me. --[[User:콩가루|콩가루]] ([[User talk:콩가루|talk]]) 14:11, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
:The encyclopedia section of Anime News Network is user-edited so it is not reliable. Refer to [[WP:ANIME/RS#Situational|the RS subpage]] and the project discussion links attached to it. [[User:Extremepro|Extremepro]] ([[User talk:Extremepro|talk]]) 06:38, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:38, 30 January 2014

WikiProject iconAnime and manga Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yuri or not yuri

I've noticed three reverts in two days, each time because someone with a dynamic IP added category:Yuri, and NocturneNoir reverted it. Constantly adding and reverting this won't solve the problem, so please take it to the talk page instead. According to WP:VER, you'll need a reliable source if you want to add controversial information to the article. Anonymous editor, if you have any reliable source (such as Anime News Network or any official Gonzo information, interviews with the mangaka, etc, but NOT blogs and the like) that states Saki is a yuri anime/manga, we can add the category. We all know it's going to happen, but until we have a reliable source for it, we can't add it yet. VDZ (talk) 16:46, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's exactly what I said in the edit summaries. ɳOCTURNEɳOIR talk // contribs 19:24, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This is the problem with Saki, though. It has so many things in it that are screamingly obvious, yet no "authoritative source" will say so because it's all part of the in-joke.PS4FA (talk) 21:31, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Captain of Tsuruga

Yumi is not captain of Tsuruga. Kanbara is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.2.16.238 (talk) 03:50, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

First one ANN's Right Turn Only import review, Erica Friedman vol. 3 Erica Friedman vol. 4 --KrebMarkt 21:07, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shelf life ep. 1-4, 25 ANN --KrebMarkt 18:34, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hisa Takei and her special ability

Actually she does have a somewhat special ability; the more tension she gets in a Mahjong match, the more likely she is to choose hand with bad odd of winning "and" win with it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.238.172.28 (talk) 06:42, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Continuation

The series is still continuing, but the episode counter and date is wrong on the side bar of the main page, for the episode of side-A — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.90.184.228 (talk) 11:44, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

saki is Yuri anime?

I found the source that Saki (TV) is yuri animation at AnimeNewsNetwork. [1] but I don't know if I can add cat:Yuri. Please help me. --콩가루 (talk) 14:11, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The encyclopedia section of Anime News Network is user-edited so it is not reliable. Refer to the RS subpage and the project discussion links attached to it. Extremepro (talk) 06:38, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]