Jump to content

Ron Suskind: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
eliminated a lot of vague and peacock words and other pov--much as i agree with Suskind's work, it's against WP.
A Hope in the Unseen: fixed citation needed template
Line 60: Line 60:
The book was chosen by the ''New York Times'', ''Chicago Tribune'', ''Washington Monthly'' and ''Booklist'' as one of the best books of the year.<ref>http://www.ronsuskind.com/hopeintheunseen/</ref> ''The New York Times Book Review'' called it an "extraordinary, formula-shattering book". [[David Halberstam]] called it a "beautiful book of a heroic American struggle."<ref>http://www.ronsuskind.com/newsite/hopeunseen/archives/cat_reviews.html</ref> The book has been a selection in college courses on American culture, education, sociology and creative writing, and has been a required reading for incoming freshmen at many{{peacock}} universities.{{citation needed}} In 2008, the book was selected as part of the "One Maryland, One Book" program.{{citation needed}}
The book was chosen by the ''New York Times'', ''Chicago Tribune'', ''Washington Monthly'' and ''Booklist'' as one of the best books of the year.<ref>http://www.ronsuskind.com/hopeintheunseen/</ref> ''The New York Times Book Review'' called it an "extraordinary, formula-shattering book". [[David Halberstam]] called it a "beautiful book of a heroic American struggle."<ref>http://www.ronsuskind.com/newsite/hopeunseen/archives/cat_reviews.html</ref> The book has been a selection in college courses on American culture, education, sociology and creative writing, and has been a required reading for incoming freshmen at many{{peacock}} universities.{{citation needed}} In 2008, the book was selected as part of the "One Maryland, One Book" program.{{citation needed}}


The book was noted for its influence on the debate over [[affirmative action]].{{citaton needed}} Upon its release in 1998, affirmative action had become one of the preeminent domestic social issues facing the country. In a review of the book, [[CNN]] declared: "As more voters, politicos and talk-show hosts write off affirmative action as a well-intentioned anachronism, ''A Hope in the Unseen'' should be required reading for would-be opinion-mongers."<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.cnn.com/books/reviews/9807/21/hope.in.the.unseen.cnn/index.html | work=CNN}}</ref> In his review for ''Newsday'', Bill Reel stated "I changed my thinking about affirmative action. I was against it, now I am for it. The agent of change was a mind-opening book – ''A Hope in the Unseen'' by Ron Suskind."<ref>http://WWW.ronsuskind.com/newsite/hopeunseen/archives/000031.html</ref>
The book was noted for its influence on the debate over [[affirmative action]].{{citation needed}} Upon its release in 1998, affirmative action had become one of the preeminent domestic social issues facing the country. In a review of the book, [[CNN]] declared: "As more voters, politicos and talk-show hosts write off affirmative action as a well-intentioned anachronism, ''A Hope in the Unseen'' should be required reading for would-be opinion-mongers."<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.cnn.com/books/reviews/9807/21/hope.in.the.unseen.cnn/index.html | work=CNN}}</ref> In his review for ''Newsday'', Bill Reel stated "I changed my thinking about affirmative action. I was against it, now I am for it. The agent of change was a mind-opening book – ''A Hope in the Unseen'' by Ron Suskind."<ref>http://WWW.ronsuskind.com/newsite/hopeunseen/archives/000031.html</ref>


The book has been a favorite of Bill Clinton <ref>http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/1999-06-07/lifestyle/9906040923_1_jennings-life-ivy-league-graduation</ref> and school reformer Michelle Rhee,<ref>http://www.fastcompany.com/1683873/what-csr-and-nonprofit-leaders-are-reading-ndash-part-ii</ref> and Barack Obama.
The book has been a favorite of Bill Clinton <ref>http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/1999-06-07/lifestyle/9906040923_1_jennings-life-ivy-league-graduation</ref> and school reformer Michelle Rhee,<ref>http://www.fastcompany.com/1683873/what-csr-and-nonprofit-leaders-are-reading-ndash-part-ii</ref> and Barack Obama.

Revision as of 07:33, 16 February 2014

Ron Suskind
Born
Ronald Steven Suskind

November 20, 1959 (age 53)
Kingston, NY
EducationUniversity of Virginia, Columbia School of Journalism
Occupation(s)Journalist, Author
AgentThe Wylie Agency
Notable credit(s)New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Esquire (magazine)
SpouseCornelia Anne Kennedy (m. 1988)
ChildrenWalter, Owen

Ronald Steven "Ron" Suskind[1] (born November 20, 1959)[2] is a Pulitzer Prize winning American journalist and best-selling author. He was the senior national affairs writer for The Wall Street Journal from 1993 to 2000 and has published the books A Hope in the Unseen, The Price of Loyalty, The One Percent Doctrine, The Way of the World and Confidence Men. He won the 1995 Pulitzer Prize for Feature Writing for his series of articles in the Wall Street Journal that became the starting point for his first book, A Hope in the Unseen. Suskind is also wrote a series of books on the George W. Bush Administration, the Barack Obama Administration, and related issues of the United States' use of power.

Life and career

Suskind was born in Kingston, New York, to a Jewish family.[3] He is the son of Shirley Berney and Walter B. Suskind,[1] and a second cousin of David Susskind.[4] He grew up in Wilmington, Delaware, attended the University of Virginia, was a brother of the SPE fraternity, and lived on The Lawn during the 1980–1981 school year. In 2005, he was the university's valediction speaker. In 1983 he received a master's degree from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism.

In 1990, Suskind went to the Wall Street Journal, and became senior national affairs reporter in 1993. In 1995, he won the Pulitzer Prize for Feature Writing for two articles on Cedric Jennings, a student at inner-city Ballou High School in Washington, D.C. who wanted to attend MIT.[5][6] Suskind left the Journal in 2000.

Suskind has written five books, and published in periodicals including Esquire and The New York Times Magazine. In 2004, he discussed his book, The Price of Loyalty, on CBS's 60 Minutes. In 2006 he discussed The One Percent Doctrine on the Colbert Report, and in 2008 he discussed The Way of the World on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart,[7] and again appeared on the show when his 2011 book, Confidence Men, was published. He has also appeared on NBC's "The Today Show", ABC's Nightline and PBS's Charlie Rose. In 2001 and 2002, he was a contributor to "Life 360," a joint production of ABC and PBS. Between 2004 and 2008, he made appearances on Frontline, the PBS series.

In the spring of 2012, Suskind was the A.M. Rosenthal Writer-in-Residence at the Harvard Kennedy School's Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy. At the Shorenstein Center he conducted four workshops for students about the process of reporting and writing titled, "Truth and Consequences: Crafting Powerful Narratives in the Age of Message."[8][9]

Suskind has two sons with his wife, Cornelia Anne Kennedy Suskind. The couple married in 1988.[1] Cornelia is the granddaughter of Democratic Representative Martin J. Kennedy.[1]

Articles

In 2002, Suskind wrote two articles in Esquire that on the workings of the George W. Bush White House. The first article, in June 2002, focused on presidential adviser Karen Hughes. White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card said that the pragmatic Hughes was "the beauty to Karl's beast", referring to top advisor Karl Rove. According to Card, her resignation signified a political shift in the administration further to the right. Suskind's second Esquire story about Rove, in December 2002, carried the comments and a long memo from Bush's former head of the White House Office of Faith-based and Community initiatives John DiIulio, an official who left the White House and spoke about his experiences. DiIulio criticized the Bush administration for having "no policy apparatus" and fixating on political calculation, and was quoted as saying "it's the reign of the Mayberry Machiavellis," a comment he then explained in a 3,000-word, on-the-record memo to Suskind about his time in the administration. DiIulio later attempted to recant some of his characterizations.

On October 17, 2004, Suskind's cover story in the New York Times Magazine, titled "Without a Doubt: Faith, Certainty and the Presidency of George W. Bush", stated that the president was planning to partially privatize Social Security as his first initiative if re-elected—a disclosure that prompted controversy in the final two weeks of the campaign. The article used the term "reality-based community", based on a conversation with a Bush aide who criticized Suskind and other people who "believe solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality."

Books

A Hope in the Unseen

In 1995 Suskind wrote a series of articles on the struggles of inner-city honors students in Washington, D.C, for which he won the Pulitzer Prize. Parts of these articles were used in his first book, A Hope in the Unseen (Doubleday/Broadway, 1998). The story chronicles the two-year journey of Cedric L. Jennings, an honor student who aspires to escape his blighted D.C. upbringing by going to an Ivy League university.

The book was chosen by the New York Times, Chicago Tribune, Washington Monthly and Booklist as one of the best books of the year.[10] The New York Times Book Review called it an "extraordinary, formula-shattering book". David Halberstam called it a "beautiful book of a heroic American struggle."[11] The book has been a selection in college courses on American culture, education, sociology and creative writing, and has been a required reading for incoming freshmen at many

universities.[citation needed] In 2008, the book was selected as part of the "One Maryland, One Book" program.[citation needed]

The book was noted for its influence on the debate over affirmative action.[citation needed] Upon its release in 1998, affirmative action had become one of the preeminent domestic social issues facing the country. In a review of the book, CNN declared: "As more voters, politicos and talk-show hosts write off affirmative action as a well-intentioned anachronism, A Hope in the Unseen should be required reading for would-be opinion-mongers."[12] In his review for Newsday, Bill Reel stated "I changed my thinking about affirmative action. I was against it, now I am for it. The agent of change was a mind-opening book – A Hope in the Unseen by Ron Suskind."[13]

The book has been a favorite of Bill Clinton [14] and school reformer Michelle Rhee,[15] and Barack Obama.

The book also drew praise for its innovations to writing style—using exhaustive reporting to place readers inside the heads of characters. Suskind calls this delving into motive and intent an effort to understand the "good enough reasons" that underlie actions, which allows for a fuller, more accurate — and often emotionally powerful — rendering of characters. The Chicago Tribune called the book "the new, new nonfiction.[16]"

The Price of Loyalty

The Price of Loyalty was published on January 13, 2004. The book, which chronicled the two-year tenure of United States Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill, was about the conduct and character of the Bush presidency. While the book covered a number of foreign and domestic issues, it is focussed on events that culminated in the Iraq War.

Among the disclosures in the book, which drew from numerous sources and more than 19,000 internal government documents, one was that the overthrow of Saddam Hussein and the U.S. occupation of Iraq was planned from Bush's first U.S. National Security Council meeting in January 2001, soon after Bush took office.[17] This lay in contrast to the perception that concerns over Iraq came to the forefront after the September 11 attacks in 2001. Administration officials have contended that O'Neill confused contingency plans with actual plans for invasion.[18]

Rather than denying his allegations, Bush officials attacked O'Neill's credibility, while answering that regime change in Iraq had been official U.S. policy since 1998, three years before Bush took office. However, O'Neill's claims called into question the relationship of the Iraq occupation to the post-9/11 War on Terrorism. After the cover sheet of a packet containing classified information was shown during a 60 Minutes interview of O'Neill and Suskind, the United States Department of Treasury investigated whether both men had improperly received classified materials. It concluded in March 2004 that no laws were violated, but that inadequate document handling policies at the Treasury had allowed 140 documents which should have been marked classified to be entered into a computer system for unclassified documents. The documents were among those subsequently released to O'Neill in response to a legal document request and then given to Suskind.[19]

In domestic affairs, the statements by O’Neill about the administration’s allegedly chaotic and politically driven policy-making process supported the claims of John DiIulio. O'Neill staed that Vice President Cheney had become part of "a co-presidency" with George W. Bush. One of the book’s disclosures involved the conflict between O’Neill and Cheney over what would become the 2003 tax cut. O’Neill, in a November 2002 meeting with Cheney and other senior officials, said that it was unprecedented to cut taxes at a time of war and that the cuts — which included the wealthiest Americans — would eventually push the government toward "fiscal crisis." Cheney’s response was, "Reagan proved deficits don’t matter. We won the midterms. This is our due." O’Neill opposed this policy.

The One Percent Doctrine

The One Percent Doctrine is Suskind's third book, published in 2006. The book is about the evolution of the foreign policy of the younger Bush's Administration especially in the wake of the September 11 attacks. Excerpts of book were published in the June 18, 2006, issue of Time. Based on interviews with more than a hundred sources, including several cabinet officials, the book concluded that U.S. foreign policy since 9/11 was driven by the Bush Doctrine, which is described by a quote from Vice President Dick Cheney saying that it was important for the U.S. to think of "low probability, high impact events" — like terrorists or rogue states getting their hands on WMD — "in a new way."

If there's a 1% chance that Pakistani scientists are helping al-Qaeda build or develop a nuclear weapon, we have to treat it as a certainty in terms of our response. It's not about our analysis.... It's about our response.

The doctrine, Suskind asserts, freed the administration from the dictates of evidence and allowed suspicion to be a guide for action in both its battles against terrorists and against rogue states, like Iraq under Saddam Hussein.

One of Suskind's assertions — that a suspect in the London subway bombings was on a US "no fly" list and attempted to enter the US – has been challenged by the US government. The FBI described Suskind's reporting on this single matter as "inaccurate", and issued a statement saying "the author has intertwined facts... causing some confusion."[20]

The book was a New York Times Bestseller. Frank Rich called it a "must-read bestseller" while Michael Hill stated: "If Bob Woodward is the chronicler of the Bush administration, Ron Suskind is the analyst... Historians will be grateful for it as they write the many final drafts in the decades to come."

The Way of the World

The Way of the World: A Story of Truth and Hope in an Age of Extremism was published on August 5, 2008. The book tells of people engaged in the challenges of national security and cultural connection. Among these stories are the tales of an intelligence official working to combat nuclear terrorism, a detainee lawyer fighting for rights at the Guantanamo Bay detention camp, a young Pakistani man interrogated under the White House, an Afghan teenager who spends a year in American high school, and former Pakistani prime minister Benazir Bhutto as she returns to Pakistan to challenge President Pervez Musharraf.[21]

In his assessment for the Literary Review, Michael Burleigh said: "Using a series of interwoven stories, some hopeful, others disturbing, Suskind explores whether the United States and the Muslim world will ever be able to find mutual respect and understanding.... This is a hugely important field that has never been so well examined."[22] The Sunday Times declared "Suskind is never unsympathetic to his characters, who he appears to have debriefed intensively. He is a romantic, a writer who clearly believes that his country has betrayed its past, its values and its moral compass by failing to tell the truth about the war." The New York Observer said: "Moving.... Mr. Suskind is a prodigiously talented craftsman.... It’s all here: a cast of characters that sprawls across class and circumstance to represent the totality of a historical moment.... These hard times, Mr. Suskind’s book suggests, call for a nonfiction Dickens."[23]

Mark Danner, reviewing the book for The New York Times, writes that "these narratives and others perform, in Mr. Suskind's hands, an intricate arabesque and manage, to a rather remarkable degree, to show us, in this age of terror, 'the true way of the world.'"[24] It is around the stories of these characters that the book frames the debate about how America lost much of its moral authority in recent years and how it is struggling, often through the actions and initiative of individuals, to restore it.[25]

The Way of the World made a series of disclosures centered on Tahir Jalil Habbush al-Tikriti, the head of Iraqi intelligence under Saddam Hussein. The book said that British and American intelligence entered into a dialogue with Habbush before the invasion of Iraq, in which Habbush revealed that Saddam possessed no weapons of mass destruction and did not take an American invasion seriously. The book also contends that the Central Intelligence Agency resettled Habbush, paid him $5 million, and forged a document in his name alleging that 9/11 hijacker Mohammad Atta trained in Iraq.[26]

The White House, former CIA director George Tenet, and former CIA officer Robert Richer, a figure in the book, denied involvement in the illegal act of fabricating the Habbush letter, denials that were echoed in an official CIA statement, saying of Suskind's claim that the White House ordered the agency to forge a letter from Habbush: "It did not happen."[27]

Suskind responded to the Rob Richer's denial, circulated by the White House, by posting on his website a partial transcript of a taped conversation with Richer in which the two discuss the Habbush forgery.[28] In response to the official CIA statement, Suskind told The Washington Post that the disclosures and details in his book are backed up by hours of interviews and that there is "not a shred of doubt about any of it."[29] On August 11, House Judiciary Committee chairman John Conyers announced that his committee would look into the matter of the Habbush letter and a variety of other disclosures in the book.[30]

The Way of the World debuted at number 3 on the New York Times bestseller list,[31] but some remarked that its revelations did not produce the outrage or scandal that would seem to attend a White House-run disinformation campaign aimed at U.S. public opinion.[32] The layers of the controversy have nonetheless deepened with the revelation that Ayad Allawi, the initial source of the Habbush letter, was at CIA headquarters the week before the letter emerged,[33] and a piece in The American Conservative by Philip Giraldi that claims an "extremely reliable and well placed source in the intelligence community" confirmed that the Vice President's Office was behind the Habbush letter, but that "Doug Feith’s Office of Special Plans", not the CIA, carried out the forgery.[34]

Some disclosures in The Way of the World received less attention than the Habbush controversy, but the story the book tells about Pervez Musharraf's actions toward Benazir Bhutto during the last months of the her life was picked up in the Pakistani press and dovetailed with a movement calling for the impeachment of the (now former) Pakistani president.[35] Speaking to another aspect of the book, Mark Danner, in his review for The New York Times, writes that "the revelation of an effort to steal and sell fissile material in Georgia's now celebrated 'breakaway region' of South Ossetia... is only the most terrifying of a dozen or more newsworthy disclosures in this book."[36] Suskind cites the battle against nuclear terrorism as the most pressing crisis the United States needs to combat in order to restore its moral authority, and details an ambitious attempt to infiltrate the worldwide nuclear black market, called the "Armageddon Test."[37]

Confidence Men

Confidence Men: Wall Street, Washington and the Education of a President was published on September 20, 2011, by HarperCollins. It describes the financial crisis that began in the U.S. in 2008, and the attempts by President Barack Obama's White House to combat it.

On September 15, 2011, news of the book began to leak to the press. The New York Times, having obtained an advanced copy, wrote: "The book offers a portrait of a White House operating under intense pressure as it dealt with a cascade of crises, from insolvent banks to collapsing carmakers. And it details the rivalries among figures around the president, including Mr. Summers; Mr. Geithner; the former chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel; and the budget director, Peter R. Orszag.[38]

An article in the Washington Post on September 16 elaborated on the content of the book, citing the allegation that Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner ignored a directive from the president to draw up plans for restructuring Citibank in the spring of 2009. The article also notes that in an interview in the book, Geithner denies the account saying "I don't slow-walk the president on anything". The White House pushed back against the book in spite of having granted Ron Suskind an interview with the president. Communications director Dan Pfeiffer said that books like these "tend to take the normal day-to-day activities of governing and infuse them with drama, palace intrigue and salacious details".[39]

While some faulted Suskind for giving greater credence to the views of sources who gave him more journalistic access others praised him for doing the opposite. In his review for the New York Times Book Review, Joe Nocera wrote "to his everlasting credit, Suskind savages several people he clearly spent time interviewing, starting with Obama's former chief economic adviser, Larry Summers, and Timothy Geithner, his Treasury secretary. And he's more than willing to step outside his re-created scenes to conduct interviews, in which Obama aides and allies tell truths that are genuinely painful to hear."[40]

In his first television appearance, on the Today Show, Suskind was interviewed by anchor Ann Curry, who cited the White House pushback in her questioning. Suskind maintained that the book represented an accurate depiction of what he had found in his reporting.[41] Hendrik Hertzberg wrote in his review of the book for The New Yorker that it would offer "support for some of today's standard progressive gripes about the President" being stymied by his conservative, Wall Street-attentive advisers, "and for a few of the conservative ones," namely assertions that Obama arrived in office unprepared to lead.[42] In his review of the book for The New York Times, Joe Nocera noted that the book had "an omniscient quality" of fly-on-the-wall scenes from inside the White House, much like the books of Bob Woodward, but "doesn’t really go for phony omniscience" where the sources who are most cooperative are rendered most favorably. In a New Republic review, John B. Judis wrote, "Suskind's book is being widely portrayed as critical of the Obama administration, but if you read the entire book, its message is that during Obama's first two years he was foiled by his own inexperience as a manager and by a staff that didn’t do good by him, but that after the Democratic defeat in 2010 he learned from his failure."[43]

Both Summers and Geithner, who responsed to discloures in the book's pages, pushed back against their characterizations after publication.[39]

A week after publication, the book debuted at No. 2 on the New York Times Bestseller list for Nonfiction.[44]

According to the book President Obama supported a financial transaction tax on trades of stocks, derivatives, and other financial instruments, but he was blocked by Summers.[45]

Confidence Men was cited on various "best book" lists, and named an Esquire 2011 Best Book of the Year, with David Granger commenting: "Journalism like this is all too rare."[46] In the March 2012 issue of The Atlantic, James Fallows cited Confidence Men in his article "Obama, Explained," writing that the Obama administration’s "early failure of accountability" in its "apparent coddling of Wall Street in 2009... is the main theme of Ron Suskind’s Confidence Men… it created a substantive and symbolic problem the administration has never fully recovered from. Substantive, because of the moral hazard created by using public money to guarantee the bonuses and repay the losses of people who had been so recklessly destructive. Symbolic, for all the reasons that eventually came to a head with last year’s Occupy movement. An official familiar with the administration’s economic policy told me: 'The recapitalization of the banks was a good idea, and necessary. But we did not put enough conditions on [their] getting the money. Ultimately not being tougher with the guys that got the money is the thing that overthrows the government twice—in 2008 [in a reaction against Bush's TARP plan] and again in 2010.'"[47]

References

  1. ^ a b c d "Cornelia A. Kennedy, A Writer, Is Married". The New York Times. May 5, 1986.
  2. ^ http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/bullpen/ron_suskind/backgrounder/
  3. ^ http://www.ronsuskind.com/articles/000033.html
  4. ^ "Biography for Ron Suskind". IMDB.
  5. ^ Against All Odds: In Rough City School, Top Students Struggle To Learn – and Escape, Ron Suskind, Wall Street Journal, May 26, 1994
  6. ^ Class Struggle: Poor, Black and Smart, An Inner-City Teen Tries to Survive MIT, Ron Suskind, Wall Street Journal, September 22, 1994
  7. ^ http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=178985&title=ron-suskind
  8. ^ http://www.hks.harvard.edu/presspol/fellowships/fellows_2012_spring.html#ron-suskind
  9. ^ "Research chat: Ron Suskind on investigative reporting, interviewing and documents". JournalistsResource.org, retrieved June 18, 2012
  10. ^ http://www.ronsuskind.com/hopeintheunseen/
  11. ^ http://www.ronsuskind.com/newsite/hopeunseen/archives/cat_reviews.html
  12. ^ CNN http://www.cnn.com/books/reviews/9807/21/hope.in.the.unseen.cnn/index.html. {{cite news}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  13. ^ http://WWW.ronsuskind.com/newsite/hopeunseen/archives/000031.html
  14. ^ http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/1999-06-07/lifestyle/9906040923_1_jennings-life-ivy-league-graduation
  15. ^ http://www.fastcompany.com/1683873/what-csr-and-nonprofit-leaders-are-reading-ndash-part-ii
  16. ^ Chicago Tribune
  17. ^ Suskind, Ron. The Price of Loyalty Simon & Schuster. 2004
  18. ^ Cabinet members defend Bush from O'Neill CNN. January 12, 2004
  19. ^ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpaq3Vr95oU
  20. ^ Press release.FBI Responds to Report on London Bomber Federal Bureau of Investigation. June 22, 2006.
  21. ^ Jenkins, Simon. Sunday Times book review Sunday Times (London). August 24, 2008.
  22. ^ Michael Burleigh, Literary Review
  23. ^ New York Observer
  24. ^ Danner, Mark. Weapons of Mass Destruction and Other Imaginative Acts The New York Times. August 27, 2008.
  25. ^ Ron Suskind interview on The Washington Posts Book World Live. August 12, 2008.
  26. ^ Ron Suskind interview on Democracy Now! August 14, 2008.
  27. ^ Warrick, Joby. CIA More Fully Denies Deception About Iraq The Washington Post. August 23, 2008.
  28. ^ Rob Richer and Ron Suskind discuss Habbush letter
  29. ^ Warrick, Joby. CIA More Fully Denies Deception About Iraq. The Washington Post. August 23, 2008.
  30. ^ Conyers announces review of allegations in Ron Suskind's The Way of the World
  31. ^ New York Times nonfiction bestsellers, August 24, 2008
  32. ^ Crook, Clive. Whispers of Watergate for Bush Financial Times. August 11, 2008.
  33. ^ Conason, Joe. New evidence suggests Ron Suskind is right. Salon. August 8, 2008
  34. ^ Giraldi, Philip. Suskind Revisited. The American Conservative. August 7, 2008.
  35. ^ Loudon, Bruce. Musharraf defies calls to quit The Australian. August 11, 2008.
  36. ^ Danner, Mark. Weapons of Mass Destruction and Other Imaginative Acts. New York Times. August 27, 2008.
  37. ^ Rosenberg, Alyssa. Speed Reading Suskind: War Games. The New Republic. August 7, 2008.
  38. ^ Landler, Mark (September 15, 2011). "Book Details Dissension in Obama Economic Team". The New York Times. Retrieved September 19, 2011.
  39. ^ a b Wallsten, Peter (September 16, 2011). "Book Portrays Dysfunction in Obama White House". Washington Post. Retrieved September 30, 2011.
  40. ^ Nocera, Joe (September 30, 2011). "The Obama White House That Couldn't". The New York Times. Retrieved October 3, 2011.
  41. ^ "Obama's Clash with Wall Street". Today Books. MSNBC.com. September 20, 2011. Retrieved October 3, 2011.
  42. ^ Hertzberg, Hendrik (October 3, 2011). "The Book on Barack". The New Yorker. Retrieved September 20, 2011.
  43. ^ Judis, John B. (October 13, 2011). "No Confidence". The New Republic. Retrieved October 14, 2011.
  44. ^ Schuessler, Jennifer (October 9, 2011). "Bestsellers: Hardcover Nonfiction". The New York Times. Retrieved September 30, 2011.
  45. ^ Suskind, Ron (2011). Confidence Men. HarperCollins. p. 365. ISBN 978-0-06-142925-5.
  46. ^ http://www.esquire.com/fiction/best-books-2011-1211-2
  47. ^ http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2012/03/obama-explained/8874/

Template:Persondata