Jump to content

Talk:Two-Spirit identity theory: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Scatach (talk | contribs)
Scatach (talk | contribs)
Line 13: Line 13:
is this article worthy of standing on it's own? it is clearly a literal copied paper (down to the manner of citing, and the design), and should be either entirely redone or removed. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/69.47.234.75|69.47.234.75]] ([[User talk:69.47.234.75|talk]]) 20:22, 30 January 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
is this article worthy of standing on it's own? it is clearly a literal copied paper (down to the manner of citing, and the design), and should be either entirely redone or removed. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/69.47.234.75|69.47.234.75]] ([[User talk:69.47.234.75|talk]]) 20:22, 30 January 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


== Possible Merge r ==
== Possible Merger ==


Should this article and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-Spirit_Identity_Theory be merged seeing as how they're basically talking about the same thing [[User:Scatach|Scatach]] ([[User talk:Scatach|talk]]) 03:26, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Should this article and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-Spirit be merged seeing as how they're basically talking about the same thing [[User:Scatach|Scatach]] ([[User talk:Scatach|talk]]) 03:26, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:27, 25 February 2014


Untitled

This page can definitely be cleaned up and turned into more encyclopedic article-- it reads like an essay, especially with the Conclusions section, which is completely POV. Dan Cottrell (talk) 03:59, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

deletion??

is this article worthy of standing on it's own? it is clearly a literal copied paper (down to the manner of citing, and the design), and should be either entirely redone or removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.47.234.75 (talk) 20:22, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possible Merger

Should this article and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-Spirit be merged seeing as how they're basically talking about the same thing Scatach (talk) 03:26, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]