This redirect is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This page can definitely be cleaned up and turned into more encyclopedic article-- it reads like an essay, especially with the Conclusions section, which is completely POV. Dan Cottrell (talk) 03:59, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
is this article worthy of standing on it's own? it is clearly a literal copied paper (down to the manner of citing, and the design), and should be either entirely redone or removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 20:22, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
Yes, but only if this one is radically cleaned up and sourced first. Then if there's anything left that isn't already covered in the other article, add it there and turn this one into a redirect. - CorbieV☊ 22:46, April 1, 2014 (UTC)
This has been flagged for over two years now. With the lack of interest in cleaning this up, the severe sourcing problems, even worse issues with over-reliance on what looks to be someone's essay, and the fact that at least some sourcing and cleanup has been done over at Two-Spirit, I'm turning this into a redirect. The history will still be here if anyone wants to go in and look for sources or anything that's not already covered in the other article, but this has sat here in an inappropriate state for too long. - CorbieV☊☼ 20:45, 3 April 2016 (UTC)