Jump to content

User talk:Conan Slog: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Sigh
Line 1: Line 1:
==Hi==
==Hi==
Hi. If you are going to contribute positively to those articles, and if your edits (and yourself) are going to be taken seriously, and if you want the edits to remain, then you should please consider engaging in CON practices. This would involve (a) using edit summs so other editors can better understand your intent (and help/support any edits), and (b) discuss any potentially controversial stuff on talk pages (again so other editors can understand and help with any needed compromises). (I would've hoped that "(c) refrain from using multiple accounts" could go without saying, but history isn't on our side on that one.) I [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AGuliolopez&diff=589357002&oldid=589298109 genuinely believe there is scope for positive contribution], so please lets try and uphold the basic mores of the project - anything else just won't "work" in the long-run. Cheers [[User:Guliolopez|Guliolopez]] ([[User talk:Guliolopez|talk]]) 17:00, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi. If you are going to contribute positively to those articles, and if your edits (and yourself) are going to be taken seriously, and if you want the edits to remain, then you should please consider engaging in CON practices. This would involve (a) using edit summs so other editors can better understand your intent (and help/support any edits), and (b) discuss any potentially controversial stuff on talk pages (again so other editors can understand and help with any needed compromises). (I would've hoped that "(c) refrain from using multiple accounts" could go without saying, but history isn't on our side on that one.) I [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AGuliolopez&diff=589357002&oldid=589298109 genuinely believe there is scope for positive contribution], so please lets try and uphold the basic mores of the project - anything else just won't "work" in the long-run. Cheers [[User:Guliolopez|Guliolopez]] ([[User talk:Guliolopez|talk]]) 17:00, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
:[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Defence_Forces_(Ireland)&diff=prev&oldid=599934275 Seriously]? You really haven't copped-yet that I am trying to help!? For [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MFIreland&oldid=369228885 four years] I've been trying to help find a path which would allow your contributions to be constructive and retained. Changes which are made with socks or through edit-warring will ''not'' remain for more than a short period. Only changes borne out of CON and constructive collaboration will stand any tests. I am sick to the back teeth of this. STOP the bloody sock-posturing. (sigh) [[User:Guliolopez|Guliolopez]] ([[User talk:Guliolopez|talk]]) 00:54, 17 March 2014 (UTC)


== Covering the revolution in Ukraine ==
== Covering the revolution in Ukraine ==

Revision as of 00:54, 17 March 2014

Hi

Hi. If you are going to contribute positively to those articles, and if your edits (and yourself) are going to be taken seriously, and if you want the edits to remain, then you should please consider engaging in CON practices. This would involve (a) using edit summs so other editors can better understand your intent (and help/support any edits), and (b) discuss any potentially controversial stuff on talk pages (again so other editors can understand and help with any needed compromises). (I would've hoped that "(c) refrain from using multiple accounts" could go without saying, but history isn't on our side on that one.) I genuinely believe there is scope for positive contribution, so please lets try and uphold the basic mores of the project - anything else just won't "work" in the long-run. Cheers Guliolopez (talk) 17:00, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously? You really haven't copped-yet that I am trying to help!? For four years I've been trying to help find a path which would allow your contributions to be constructive and retained. Changes which are made with socks or through edit-warring will not remain for more than a short period. Only changes borne out of CON and constructive collaboration will stand any tests. I am sick to the back teeth of this. STOP the bloody sock-posturing. (sigh) Guliolopez (talk) 00:54, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Covering the revolution in Ukraine

Good evening. I noticed that you undid my recent edits about the events in Kiev while also adding a source. I do prefer my version, as is kind of obvious... could you say what specific things bothered you about it? Answering on this page would be fine, or we could also move the discussion to the article's talk page. --Kizor 19:14, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Conan Slog, you are invited to the Teahouse

Teahouse logo

Hi Conan Slog! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:40, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2014 Ukrainian revolution may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • com/News/News.aspx/177727#.UxrUeN9e4W0 Report: As Ukrainian Unrest Unfolds, Anti-Semitism Rises] Retrieved on March 8, 2014</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:50, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

UNSC vote

Why is it important to have the statement by the Russian representative? Clearly, it is more important to list what countries voted for what option. If this keeps on going, I may have to ask the admins to intervene --Bellerophon5685 (talk) 00:01, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]