Jump to content

User talk:Mandrake00: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Unblock request
Line 23: Line 23:


Please read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] for more information. [[User:Yunshui|Yunshui]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Yunshui|<sup style="font-size:90%">雲</sup>]][[Special:Contributions/Yunshui|<sub style="font-size:90%">水</sub>]] 12:51, 15 April 2014 (UTC)}}
Please read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] for more information. [[User:Yunshui|Yunshui]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Yunshui|<sup style="font-size:90%">雲</sup>]][[Special:Contributions/Yunshui|<sub style="font-size:90%">水</sub>]] 12:51, 15 April 2014 (UTC)}}


{{unblock|reason=*the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, it is already distorted.
*the block is no longer necessary because I don't understand why I have to be blocked for trying to correct the distorted information*will continue to help Wikipedia to restore distorted data*#will make useful contributions as I have always done.}}

Revision as of 13:11, 15 April 2014

May 2013

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Veganism, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Rklawton (talk) 03:48, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for 3RR; multiple accounts, as you did at Veganism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Rklawton (talk) 04:03, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mandrake00 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Rklawton: Shed ignorance and accept the truth. Since when is the honey Vegan? Don't abuse your rights. Is this a Quality Database or the Political forum of the people like Rklawton?Mandrake00 (talk) 04:15, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. jpgordon::==( o ) 04:40, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wikipedia: End Administratorship. Revoke All so called "Administrator" rights or be doomed. You are sending away contributors and letting the so called "administrators" misuse their rights.


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mandrake00 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Blocking true contributors like me for the sake of the selfish so-called administrators who distort the facts is harmful to the authenticity of Wikipedia

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui  12:51, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.



This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Mandrake00 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, it is already distorted.
  • the block is no longer necessary because I don't understand why I have to be blocked for trying to correct the distorted information*will continue to help Wikipedia to restore distorted data*#will make useful contributions as I have always done.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=*the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, it is already distorted. *the block is no longer necessary because I don't understand why I have to be blocked for trying to correct the distorted information*will continue to help Wikipedia to restore distorted data*#will make useful contributions as I have always done. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=*the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, it is already distorted. *the block is no longer necessary because I don't understand why I have to be blocked for trying to correct the distorted information*will continue to help Wikipedia to restore distorted data*#will make useful contributions as I have always done. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=*the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, it is already distorted. *the block is no longer necessary because I don't understand why I have to be blocked for trying to correct the distorted information*will continue to help Wikipedia to restore distorted data*#will make useful contributions as I have always done. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}