Talk:Got to Get You into My Life: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m add RfC/RfM notice |
No edit summary |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
Surely there should be some mention on the Anthology version? --[[User:Yeepsi|Yeepsi]] ([[User Talk: Yeepsi|Talk to me!]]) 12:30, 28 August 2011 (UTC) |
Surely there should be some mention on the Anthology version? --[[User:Yeepsi|Yeepsi]] ([[User Talk: Yeepsi|Talk to me!]]) 12:30, 28 August 2011 (UTC) |
||
== In my opinion, the Anthology version is arguably better than the Revolver album version. |
|||
== Genre == |
== Genre == |
Revision as of 10:16, 15 June 2014
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Got to Get You into My Life article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Consensus per this RfC closure and this RfM closure is to use "the Beatles" mid-sentence. |
Please add
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | The Beatles C‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Anthology version
Surely there should be some mention on the Anthology version? --Yeepsi (Talk to me!) 12:30, 28 August 2011 (UTC) == In my opinion, the Anthology version is arguably better than the Revolver album version.
Genre
It would be interesting to have an explanation for the addition of "blues-rock" to the list of genres, given virtually no elements of blues can be found in this composition. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.124.31.86 (talk) 23:27, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
- The source being cited for the genres has the author questioning "is it big-band "pop", neolyte blues, modal contemporary rock, or what-not?" Since he doesnt give an answer, I replaced it with this (p. 118-119) and this (p. 53). Dan56 (talk) 19:27, 29 December 2012 (UTC)