Talk:Got to Get You into My Life: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 10:18, 15 June 2014

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Got to Get You into My Life article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

The Beatles C‑class Low‑importance

This Beatles-related article is within the scope of WikiProject The Beatles, which focuses on improving coverage of English rock band The Beatles and related topics on Wikipedia. Users who are willing to participate in the project should visit the project page, where they can join and see a list of open tasks.The BeatlesWikipedia:WikiProject The BeatlesTemplate:WikiProject The BeatlesThe Beatles articles

C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to songs on Wikipedia.

To-do list:

For WikiProject The Beatles

A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Articles on each Beatle tour (Category:The Beatles concert tours). See: Missing articles.
Expand : The Lost Lennon Tapes, notable radio series which has spawned many bootlegs. Apple Records See also: Adopt an article
Stubs : See: Category:The Beatles song stubs
Update : Pics/Graphics wanted: Kenwood.
Verify : Beatle wives
Other : Project: Add {{WikiProject The Beatles}} to the talk pages of all Beatles-related articles. Send a newsletter to members, canvas for new members and coordinate tasks. Enter articles assessed as stubs onto this list, also list articles needing cleanup and other work here.

This article does not yet have a related to do list. If you can think of any ways to improve the article, why not create one?

Anthology version

Surely there should be some mention on the Anthology version? --Yeepsi (Talk to me!) 12:30, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, the Anthology version is arguably better than the Revolver album version.

Genre

It would be interesting to have an explanation for the addition of "blues-rock" to the list of genres, given virtually no elements of blues can be found in this composition. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.124.31.86 (talk) 23:27, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The source being cited for the genres has the author questioning "is it big-band "pop", neolyte blues, modal contemporary rock, or what-not?" Since he doesnt give an answer, I replaced it with this (p. 118-119) and this (p. 53). Dan56 (talk) 19:27, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 Surely there should be some mention on the Anthology version? --[[User:Yeepsi|Yeepsi]] ([[User Talk: Yeepsi|Talk to me!]]) 12:30, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
-== In my opinion, the Anthology version is arguably better than the Revolver album version.
+::In my opinion, the Anthology version is arguably better than the Revolver album version.
 == Genre ==