Talk:Anil Agarwal (Industrialist): Difference between revisions
Jayakumar RG (talk | contribs) →Redirect: r |
Jayakumar RG (talk | contribs) →Redirect: r |
||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
::::Don't try to [[Wikipedia:GAMING|game]] the system. http://www.forbes.com/profile/anil-agarwal/ , http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/companies/anil-agarwal-to-donate-75-of-wealth-for-good-of-society/article6449869.ece , http://www.hindustantimes.com/business-news/vedanta-s-agarwal-to-donate-most-of-fortune-to-charity/article1-1268680.aspx and thousands of other sources well confirms his notability. [[User:Bladesmulti|Bladesmulti]] ([[User talk:Bladesmulti|talk]]) 05:59, 20 October 2014 (UTC) |
::::Don't try to [[Wikipedia:GAMING|game]] the system. http://www.forbes.com/profile/anil-agarwal/ , http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/companies/anil-agarwal-to-donate-75-of-wealth-for-good-of-society/article6449869.ece , http://www.hindustantimes.com/business-news/vedanta-s-agarwal-to-donate-most-of-fortune-to-charity/article1-1268680.aspx and thousands of other sources well confirms his notability. [[User:Bladesmulti|Bladesmulti]] ([[User talk:Bladesmulti|talk]]) 05:59, 20 October 2014 (UTC) |
||
:::::Dont attribute motives to a user. There is community consensus that a businessman can have an article, only if he heads an FTSE 100 Index company. I was simply following consensus. If no such criteria were there, I would have taken the article to AfD. [[User:Jayakumar RG|Jayakumar RG]] ([[User talk:Jayakumar RG|talk]]) 07:47, 20 October 2014 (UTC) |
:::::Dont attribute motives to a user. There is community consensus that a businessman can have an article, only if he heads an FTSE 100 Index company. I was simply following consensus. If no such criteria were there, I would have taken the article to AfD. [[User:Jayakumar RG|Jayakumar RG]] ([[User talk:Jayakumar RG|talk]]) 07:47, 20 October 2014 (UTC) |
||
::::::Since you have produced no argument for the article's notability, I am taking it back to a redirect. [[User:Jayakumar RG|Jayakumar RG]] ([[User talk:Jayakumar RG|talk]]) 16:25, 20 October 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:25, 20 October 2014
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Anil Agarwal (Industrialist) redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Need help to start social work for blind persons
Dear Sir
I have read in the news that you want to donate to society.
My sicere congratulations to you..
I am Anil Gupta --Working professional of Ludhiana India have some plan for BLIND PEOPLE of India and worldwide.
I want to open chain of restorants where only blind people will be employed. This will be a great help to society.
I may need some financial help initially ..
Looking to hear from you
Regards
Anil Gupta
Ludhiana - India
9316860007 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.62.189.76 (talk) 05:14, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
Redirect
User: Bladesmulti, I turned this into a redirect because according to BLP notability criteria, article about a businessman should be created only if he is the head of a FTSE 100 Index company. There was no need for consensus here(see WP:BOLD). On an unrelated topic, may I ask why you have been stalking my edits so much? Jayakumar RG (talk) 05:19, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- It is better if you go for a AFD if you have any concerns with the notability. I don't find anyway to convince if that's your reason for saying that there was lack of notability. Page has many reliable citations, significant history of contributions. It is obvious that there is need of an agreement before it is turned into a redirect. Stalking? Read Wikipedia:HA#NOT. Bladesmulti (talk) 05:23, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- Not harassment, but simple, inexplicable edit-stalking. It is standard procedure for turning a page into redirect if there is a lack of notability. Also, see WP:BOLD. Jayakumar RG (talk) 05:31, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- Don't try to game the system. http://www.forbes.com/profile/anil-agarwal/ , http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/companies/anil-agarwal-to-donate-75-of-wealth-for-good-of-society/article6449869.ece , http://www.hindustantimes.com/business-news/vedanta-s-agarwal-to-donate-most-of-fortune-to-charity/article1-1268680.aspx and thousands of other sources well confirms his notability. Bladesmulti (talk) 05:59, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- Dont attribute motives to a user. There is community consensus that a businessman can have an article, only if he heads an FTSE 100 Index company. I was simply following consensus. If no such criteria were there, I would have taken the article to AfD. Jayakumar RG (talk) 07:47, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- Since you have produced no argument for the article's notability, I am taking it back to a redirect. Jayakumar RG (talk) 16:25, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- Dont attribute motives to a user. There is community consensus that a businessman can have an article, only if he heads an FTSE 100 Index company. I was simply following consensus. If no such criteria were there, I would have taken the article to AfD. Jayakumar RG (talk) 07:47, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- Don't try to game the system. http://www.forbes.com/profile/anil-agarwal/ , http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/companies/anil-agarwal-to-donate-75-of-wealth-for-good-of-society/article6449869.ece , http://www.hindustantimes.com/business-news/vedanta-s-agarwal-to-donate-most-of-fortune-to-charity/article1-1268680.aspx and thousands of other sources well confirms his notability. Bladesmulti (talk) 05:59, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- Not harassment, but simple, inexplicable edit-stalking. It is standard procedure for turning a page into redirect if there is a lack of notability. Also, see WP:BOLD. Jayakumar RG (talk) 05:31, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- It is better if you go for a AFD if you have any concerns with the notability. I don't find anyway to convince if that's your reason for saying that there was lack of notability. Page has many reliable citations, significant history of contributions. It is obvious that there is need of an agreement before it is turned into a redirect. Stalking? Read Wikipedia:HA#NOT. Bladesmulti (talk) 05:23, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- Redirect-Class biography articles
- Redirect-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Mid-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- Redirect-Class India articles
- Low-importance India articles
- Redirect-Class India articles of Low-importance
- Redirect-Class Bihar articles
- Low-importance Bihar articles
- Redirect-Class Bihar articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Bihar articles
- WikiProject India articles
- Wikipedia requested images of business and economics people
- Wikipedia requested images of people of the United Kingdom