Talk:AKQA: Difference between revisions
Assessed article class & importance |
Added WikiProject Marketing & Advertising and made assessment |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk header}} |
{{Talk header}} |
||
{{WikiProject Companies|class=start|importance=low}} |
{{WikiProject Companies|class=start|importance=low}} |
||
{{WikiProject Marketing & Advertising|class=Start|importance=Low}} |
|||
== "reads like an advertisement" infobox == |
== "reads like an advertisement" infobox == |
Revision as of 20:13, 26 October 2014
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the AKQA article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Companies Start‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||||||||||
|
Marketing & Advertising Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
"reads like an advertisement" infobox
Can someone help out by highlighting the sections that are most problematic? My first reaction to that infobox is, of course the article reads like an advertisement, it was written by experts in the advertising industry. Ashleyisachild (talk) 02:39, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Seems like this infobox needs updating. There have been made quite a few edits since August 2012 when the infobox was added. In my opinion this article contains sufficient multiple independent and third-party sources to back-up its content. I added links were citation references were still needed. As AKQA is a digital agency and their notable products and services revolve around digital marketing, advertising and technology, this seems to cause the "reads like an advertisement" feel.--Jimengna (talk) 22:19, 19 October 2014 (UTC)