Talk:Diachrony and synchrony: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:30, 19 November 2014

Linguistics Stub‑class High‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Languages Stub‑class

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Saussure

Shouldn't we mention Swiss linguist Ferdinand de Saussure in this article? He was the one who brought up the distinction between a synchronic and a diachronic analysis of language. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.230.47.64 (talk) 21:23, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and perhaps Adorno with respect to musically analogous materials together with Chomsky.Ernstblumberg (talk) 16:30, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 18:25, 22 August 2014 edit Aucassin (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 755 edits m Aucassin moved page Talk:Synchronic analysis to Talk:Synchrony and diachrony: widening of scope ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:30, 19 November 2014 edit undo Ernstblumberg (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 590 edits m →‎Saussure: rep Next edit →
Line 5:		Line 5:

	Shouldn't we mention Swiss linguist Ferdinand de Saussure in this article? He was the one who brought up the distinction between a synchronic and a diachronic analysis of language. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/217.230.47.64\|217.230.47.64]] ([[User talk:217.230.47.64\|talk]]) 21:23, 17 March 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->		Shouldn't we mention Swiss linguist Ferdinand de Saussure in this article? He was the one who brought up the distinction between a synchronic and a diachronic analysis of language. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/217.230.47.64\|217.230.47.64]] ([[User talk:217.230.47.64\|talk]]) 21:23, 17 March 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
			:Yes, and perhaps [[Theodor_W._Adorno\|Adorno]] with respect to musically analogous materials together with [[Noam_Chomsky\|Chomsky]].[[User:Ernstblumberg\|Ernstblumberg]] ([[User talk:Ernstblumberg\|talk]]) 16:30, 19 November 2014 (UTC)