Jump to content

Talk:Brenner v. Scott: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Photo: *another* minor edit, correcting typo & adding stuff in parenths; thanking Bmclaughlin9 (talk) for helping editors on both sides of this issue. :)
→‎Photo: *another* minor edit,changing word-order to clarify why i'm not a registered editor Bmclaughlin9 (talk) for helping editors on both sides of this issue. :)
Line 12: Line 12:
:The owner of the photo should add it to Wikipedia's resources. The process may look complicated, but it's not hard to figure out. Working on a computer where you have a copy of the image, start [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Upload here] and use the '''Upload Wizard'''. Then give us a link to the file here. [[User:Bmclaughlin9|Bmclaughlin9]] ([[User talk:Bmclaughlin9|talk]]) 04:12, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
:The owner of the photo should add it to Wikipedia's resources. The process may look complicated, but it's not hard to figure out. Working on a computer where you have a copy of the image, start [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Upload here] and use the '''Upload Wizard'''. Then give us a link to the file here. [[User:Bmclaughlin9|Bmclaughlin9]] ([[User talk:Bmclaughlin9|talk]]) 04:12, 6 December 2014 (UTC)


::While I am an 'unregistered' editor, and thus can not upload stuff (too much arguing going on here!), I would like to thank you, [[User:Bmclaughlin9|Bmclaughlin9]] ([[User talk:Bmclaughlin9|talk]]), for assisting in both matters:
::While I am an 'unregistered' editor (too much arguing going on here! is why I ain't registered), and thus can not upload stuff , I would like to thank you, [[User:Bmclaughlin9|Bmclaughlin9]] ([[User talk:Bmclaughlin9|talk]]), for assisting in both matters:


:: First, the plaintiffs, apparently, are also unregistered editors and can not upload stuff, so thank you for stepping up to the plate and going to bat. (I say this with no conflict of interest: While I oppose any and all mistreatment of gays, I do not support a definition of marriage to include anything other than 'traditional' marriage, but, again, the plaintiffs here should be made to feel welcome and helped out with their upload issues.)
:: First, the plaintiffs, apparently, are also unregistered editors and can not upload stuff, so thank you for stepping up to the plate and going to bat. (I say this with no conflict of interest: While I oppose any and all mistreatment of gays, I do not support a definition of marriage to include anything other than 'traditional' marriage, but, again, the plaintiffs here should be made to feel welcome and helped out with their upload issues.)

Revision as of 05:34, 6 December 2014

WikiProject iconLaw C‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconFlorida Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconLGBT studies Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Photo

Those of us in the Brenner v Scott now Armstrong case would like to ask that the photo located on the web site of the Jax paper be used on this site. This photo was taken BY the plaintiffs and supplied to our attys to be used by the press. We have others that can also be used if you do not want to use the one from the Times Union.

http://jacksonville.com/news/florida/2014-12-03/story/gay-marriage-could-be-real-many-jan-6-barring-supreme-court-action
The owner of the photo should add it to Wikipedia's resources. The process may look complicated, but it's not hard to figure out. Working on a computer where you have a copy of the image, start here and use the Upload Wizard. Then give us a link to the file here. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 04:12, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
While I am an 'unregistered' editor (too much arguing going on here! is why I ain't registered), and thus can not upload stuff , I would like to thank you, Bmclaughlin9 (talk), for assisting in both matters:
First, the plaintiffs, apparently, are also unregistered editors and can not upload stuff, so thank you for stepping up to the plate and going to bat. (I say this with no conflict of interest: While I oppose any and all mistreatment of gays, I do not support a definition of marriage to include anything other than 'traditional' marriage, but, again, the plaintiffs here should be made to feel welcome and helped out with their upload issues.)
Secondly, I see you were a fair player and placed that one resource link (for selected case data downloads) in a proper place. While I had erroneously placed it in probably a less than optimal place, I did to improve your article here, and I am glad that you helped work out a compromise that works for all.96.59.130.176 (talk) 05:28, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]