Talk:Brenner v. Scott: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Brenner v Armstrong photo added: fixing typo in title - problem fixed! :) |
(I fixed your Brenner v Armstrong photo/image problem) ... change formate to demote my post: It is not so important as to stand alone, but fits in with prior comments in context: |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
::Secondly, I see you were a fair player and placed that one resource link (for selected case data downloads) in a proper place. While I had erroneously placed it in probably a less than optimal place, I did to improve your article here, and I am glad that you helped work out a compromise that works for all.[[Special:Contributions/96.59.130.176|96.59.130.176]] ([[User talk:96.59.130.176|talk]]) 05:28, 6 December 2014 (UTC) |
::Secondly, I see you were a fair player and placed that one resource link (for selected case data downloads) in a proper place. While I had erroneously placed it in probably a less than optimal place, I did to improve your article here, and I am glad that you helped work out a compromise that works for all.[[Special:Contributions/96.59.130.176|96.59.130.176]] ([[User talk:96.59.130.176|talk]]) 05:28, 6 December 2014 (UTC) |
||
== I somehow figured out how to add your photo. == |
=== I somehow figured out how to add your photo. === |
||
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brenner_v._Scott&diff=636852490&oldid=636828809 |
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brenner_v._Scott&diff=636852490&oldid=636828809 |
Revision as of 06:11, 6 December 2014
![]() | Law C‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
|
![]() | Florida Unassessed | |||||||||
|
![]() | LGBT studies Unassessed | ||||||
|
Photo
![]() | {{request edit}} has been deprecated. Please change this template call to one of the following:
|
Those of us in the Brenner v Scott now Armstrong case would like to ask that the photo located on the web site of the Jax paper be used on this site. This photo was taken BY the plaintiffs and supplied to our attys to be used by the press. We have others that can also be used if you do not want to use the one from the Times Union.
http://jacksonville.com/news/florida/2014-12-03/story/gay-marriage-could-be-real-many-jan-6-barring-supreme-court-action
- The owner of the photo should add it to Wikipedia's resources. The process may look complicated, but it's not hard to figure out. Working on a computer where you have a copy of the image, start here and use the Upload Wizard. Then give us a link to the file here. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 04:12, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- While I am an 'unregistered' editor (too much arguing going on here! is why I ain't registered), and thus can not upload stuff , I would like to thank you, Bmclaughlin9 (talk), for assisting in both matters:
- First, the plaintiffs, apparently, are also unregistered editors and can not upload stuff, so thank you for stepping up to the plate and going to bat. (I say this with no conflict of interest: While I oppose any and all mistreatment of gays, I do not support a definition of marriage to include anything other than 'traditional' marriage, but, again, the plaintiffs here should be made to feel welcome and helped out with their upload issues.)
- Secondly, I see you were a fair player and placed that one resource link (for selected case data downloads) in a proper place. While I had erroneously placed it in probably a less than optimal place, I did to improve your article here, and I am glad that you helped work out a compromise that works for all.96.59.130.176 (talk) 05:28, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
I somehow figured out how to add your photo.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brenner_v._Scott&diff=636852490&oldid=636828809
Problem fixed. :) 96.59.130.176 (talk) 06:08, 6 December 2014 (UTC)