User talk:Little Mountain 5: Difference between revisions
Suckmygnnk (talk | contribs) |
m Reverted edits by Suckmygnnk (talk) to last version by Little Mountain 5 |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:My apologies for the extremely slow reply! Normally, when a user vandalizes again after they've already received a final warning ([[WP:WARN|Level 4 or 4im]]), you should report them at the [[WP:AIV|administrator intervention against vandalism noticeboard]] (AIV). An administrator will review your report, and [[WP:BLOCK|block]] the user if necessary. However, in [[Special:Contributions/64.150.16.32|64.150.16.32]]'s case, I would simply warn them again (as you did) because of the long time gap between the final warning (April) and the vandalism in question (September). If you need any more assistance, feel free to ask; I will be able to respond much more quickly from now on. Cheers, <i style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:Little Mountain 5|<b style="color:#000">Little</b>]][[User talk:Little Mountain 5|<b style="color:red">Mountain</b>]][[Special:Contribs/Little Mountain 5|<b style="color:#00008B">5</b>]]</i> 06:00, 6 November 2014 (UTC) |
:My apologies for the extremely slow reply! Normally, when a user vandalizes again after they've already received a final warning ([[WP:WARN|Level 4 or 4im]]), you should report them at the [[WP:AIV|administrator intervention against vandalism noticeboard]] (AIV). An administrator will review your report, and [[WP:BLOCK|block]] the user if necessary. However, in [[Special:Contributions/64.150.16.32|64.150.16.32]]'s case, I would simply warn them again (as you did) because of the long time gap between the final warning (April) and the vandalism in question (September). If you need any more assistance, feel free to ask; I will be able to respond much more quickly from now on. Cheers, <i style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:Little Mountain 5|<b style="color:#000">Little</b>]][[User talk:Little Mountain 5|<b style="color:red">Mountain</b>]][[Special:Contribs/Little Mountain 5|<b style="color:#00008B">5</b>]]</i> 06:00, 6 November 2014 (UTC) |
||
== Precious |
== Precious again == |
||
<div style="margin: auto; max-width: 60em; {{box-shadow|0.1em|0.1em|0.5em|rgba( 192, 192, 192, 0.75 )}} {{border-radius|1em}} border: 1px solid #a7d7f9; margin-bottom: 1em; padding: 0.5em 1em 1em; color: black;" class="ui-helper-clearfix"> |
<div style="margin: auto; max-width: 60em; {{box-shadow|0.1em|0.1em|0.5em|rgba( 192, 192, 192, 0.75 )}} {{border-radius|1em}} border: 1px solid #a7d7f9; margin-bottom: 1em; padding: 0.5em 1em 1em; color: black;" class="ui-helper-clearfix"> |
||
Revision as of 02:30, 11 December 2014
Vandalism
Hi. I am referring to you as I noticed that you also told the same person to stop their edits with Miami Heat. This time they did it to General Hospital. I would like some help as how to proceed. Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 15:41, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- My apologies for the extremely slow reply! Normally, when a user vandalizes again after they've already received a final warning (Level 4 or 4im), you should report them at the administrator intervention against vandalism noticeboard (AIV). An administrator will review your report, and block the user if necessary. However, in 64.150.16.32's case, I would simply warn them again (as you did) because of the long time gap between the final warning (April) and the vandalism in question (September). If you need any more assistance, feel free to ask; I will be able to respond much more quickly from now on. Cheers, LittleMountain5 06:00, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
Precious again
Oregon rivers
Thank you for quality articles on Oregon's rivers, such as Little Butte Creek, looking at the related history and people, - repeating: you are an awesome Wikipedian (5 July 2008)!
Two years ago, you were the 267th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:33, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks yet again, Gerda! LittleMountain5 06:00, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
Data Request - 1790-1990 Urban Census Data
Hi Little Mountain 5, I'm creating a graph for a presentation demonstrating the rise of population in the US over time. I've scoured the US Census Bureau website and haven't found an easy way to download the information. Unfortunately, it seems like everything is set up in individual text tables by year, requiring lots of cut, paste, text import wizard, clean up, and data matching, which I estimate would take a few hours of work. Would you mind sending me the data set behind your wonderful chart comparing urban populations from 1790-1990?
I tried to email you, but I haven't received Wikipedia's confirmation email yet. You can email me at chripstopher (at) yahoo.com .
Thank you for your help!
Chris — Preceding comment added by Chripstopher (talk • contribs) 03:52, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
- Sure, no problem! Check your inbox. Cheers, LittleMountain5 04:50, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
My thanks for the delete!
Category:CWGC sites - redundant page, it needed to go; I created it before I learned about existing, better, ones. Narky Blert (talk) 01:23, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
- No problem, that happens to the best of us. :-) Cheers, LittleMountain5 02:50, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Thank you!
Just wanted to thank you for accepting my request and deleting 
. Really appreciate it! TeamGale 08:52, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- You bet! Cheers, LittleMountain5 20:46, 10 December 2014 (UTC)