Jump to content

User talk:Bladesmulti: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Bladesmulti (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Volt60x (talk | contribs)
can you help me: new section
Line 96: Line 96:
Hi Bladesmulti, Master and sock need to be interchanged. Volt60x was created after master account was blocked. --<span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Kokonor;color:green">Vigyani</span><sub>[[User talk:Vigyani|''talk'']]</sub><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Vigyani|ਯੋਗਦਾਨ]]</sup> 05:36, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi Bladesmulti, Master and sock need to be interchanged. Volt60x was created after master account was blocked. --<span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Kokonor;color:green">Vigyani</span><sub>[[User talk:Vigyani|''talk'']]</sub><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Vigyani|ਯੋਗਦਾਨ]]</sup> 05:36, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
:I was aware that Volt60x was created at least 10 hours later. Although for comparison purposes, it is still better to keep the more significant account at start. Once we are done of investigation, it will be moved to [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ashutoshsinghkaulvalmiki]]. [[User:Bladesmulti|Bladesmulti]] ([[User talk:Bladesmulti#top|talk]]) 05:40, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
:I was aware that Volt60x was created at least 10 hours later. Although for comparison purposes, it is still better to keep the more significant account at start. Once we are done of investigation, it will be moved to [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ashutoshsinghkaulvalmiki]]. [[User:Bladesmulti|Bladesmulti]] ([[User talk:Bladesmulti#top|talk]]) 05:40, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

== can you help me ==

there is a link on [[Valmiki Caste]] it indicates that boyar caste be merged into valmiki caste...how to fix it? and that article tells that it needs additional citations how can we fix this?[[User:Volt60x|Volt60x]] ([[User talk:Volt60x|talk]]) 17:10, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:10, 7 January 2015

That's the man!

See also:
* Tips - Any tips/advises on recent edits.
* Grammar - Any copy editing, grammar, formatting tips.

Special wishes...

Season's Greetings

The dirt hits the fan

Now let's see where the shit comes down... Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 07:13, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is troubling and some of them are autoconfirmed users. Bladesmulti (talk) 07:23, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback for Tehran

Hello, Bladesmulti. You have new messages at Rye-96's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Tibetan culture

Hello, Bladesmulti. You have new messages at Talk:Tibetan culture.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

. Joshua Jonathan ‎ - please you too. I think we need to adopt a Tibetan. I don't want to leave a message on your talk because certain editors there might make this into a controversy very soon, I do not wish to get this newbie bitten. Hafspajen (talk) 13:58, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I could do better only if I had more time because I am currently dealing with multiple sock masters. Although still check every article where I am actually interested. Bladesmulti (talk) 14:30, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're popular these days, aren't you? But what I don't get: why is Johnny attacking you, and then says that you are making personal attacks. [removed] Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 16:06, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Though, "peanut gallery" is also great. @Hafspajen: we need some decorations here! Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 16:11, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
What's going on today? Johnny & Johnny, 104~, Satyananda - somebody forgot to lock the doors? Every time I press the refresh-button for my watchlist, new threads pop-up. Or are we just plain nuts, and staying at the wrong places? Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 16:15, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It maybe irritating at start, but later you would laugh. They think that we take them seriously. Also that 3RR report is getting funnier and funnier. Bladesmulti (talk) 16:40, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
We have multiple copies of an IP who doesn't understand IP and so keeps adding copies. That is, the unregistered editor doesn't recognize intellectual property, and generates copies of himself and copies of stuff that should not be copied. Even if the IPs are not a banned editor, they still need blocking, and their pomposity is getting bizarre. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:54, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The Surreal Barnstar
Who's ever seen this kind of slapstick: an edit-war at ANI, among all the other turbulence of today... Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 20:21, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, this is still getting more bizarre... I'm going to turn it off now; I've seen enough madness for today. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 20:54, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there

Hello Bladesmulti :-). I have seen that you reverted some edits made by a banned-user. Well that is understandable, but as one of the editors with the most edits in Iranian-related articles (and also some in Armenian, Kurdish and Turkic-related), i would like to ask if i have the permission to restore those edits, well - of course after i have investigated it to see whether it was a acceptable edit(s) or not. My apologies if my English sounds a little bad right now, i have been quite tired recently. --Mossadegh-e Mihan-dust (talk) 22:17, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:BANREVERT, you cannot recover the changes that have been made by a banned user. When you are taking the responsibility of his changes, you will also discover that it is actually hard to even recognize that his versions have got a grip. If the subject comes from Safavid Empire and it is not liked by this banned user, he would highlight only those events that occurred in Afghanistan and mark rest of the Iranian geography as Safavid Iran. If he found that one citation is undue, he would probably remove those information that are due. But you can let me know any of the pages where you may have thought that his changes were important so that we can rephrase and use better citations. Bladesmulti (talk) 23:57, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If the info seems to be valid, check the sources, and if possible, improve it. In case of doubt, or just out of courtesy, discuss first at the talkpage. Reliable info is always welcome; just make sure it's reliable. And take your time to check the sources; that in itself is fun too. At leats it is to me; I like to learn new things. Best regards to all of you, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 05:30, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot

Hi Bladesmulti, Thank you very much for taking care of my talk page while I was away. I appreciate it a lot. --Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 11:40, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to hear. Bladesmulti (talk) 11:51, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dutch IPs

You're probably dealing with open proxies.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 11:59, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Horrible people, those Dutch. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 12:04, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed during the ongoing SPI.[1] He has a large pool of proxies, yes they are mostly Dutch, but they are also from the United States, Ukraine, and others. Bladesmulti (talk) 12:05, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Blades, have a look at Wikipedia:Ownership of articles#Statements: "Undo peanut-gallery editor." Sounds familiair, doesn't it? Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 15:37, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
"hostile comments from the peanut gallery". Yes! Bladesmulti (talk) 15:48, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

It appears that an IP is claiming that you are frauding at Middle Eastern American. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:26, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removed that discussion. While I had no intention to look into content, as it was written by a banned user, I just saw that [2] actually mention Northern Africans, and supports that pointed sentence. The banned user is as usual gaming the system and misinterpreting the references. Bladesmulti (talk) 17:33, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Volt60x SPI

Hi Bladesmulti, Master and sock need to be interchanged. Volt60x was created after master account was blocked. --Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 05:36, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was aware that Volt60x was created at least 10 hours later. Although for comparison purposes, it is still better to keep the more significant account at start. Once we are done of investigation, it will be moved to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ashutoshsinghkaulvalmiki. Bladesmulti (talk) 05:40, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

can you help me

there is a link on Valmiki Caste it indicates that boyar caste be merged into valmiki caste...how to fix it? and that article tells that it needs additional citations how can we fix this?Volt60x (talk) 17:10, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]