Persona non grata: Difference between revisions
m Reverted edits by 180.191.80.120 (talk) to last version by 2001:5B0:23FF:2CF0:0:0:0:33 |
m →Diplomacy: typo |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Under the [[Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations]] Article 9, a receiving State may "at any time and without having to explain its decision" declare any member of a diplomatic staff ''persona non grata.'' A person so declared is considered unacceptable and is usually recalled to his or her home nation. If not recalled, the receiving State "may refuse to recognize the person concerned as a member of the mission."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ediplomat.com/nd/treaties/diplomatic_relations.htm |title=Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations |at=Article 9 |website=eDiplomat |accessdate=18 February 2014}}</ref> |
Under the [[Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations]] Article 9, a receiving State may "at any time and without having to explain its decision" declare any member of a diplomatic staff ''persona non grata.'' A person so declared is considered unacceptable and is usually recalled to his or her home nation. If not recalled, the receiving State "may refuse to recognize the person concerned as a member of the mission."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ediplomat.com/nd/treaties/diplomatic_relations.htm |title=Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations |at=Article 9 |website=eDiplomat |accessdate=18 February 2014}}</ref> |
||
With the protection of mission staff from prosecution for violating civil and [[criminal law]]s, depending on rank, under Articles 41 and 42 of the Vienna Convention, they are bound to respect national laws and regulations. Breaches of these articles can lead to a ''persona non grata'' declaration being used to punish erring staff. It is also used to expel diplomats suspected of [[espionage]] (described as "activities incompatible with diplomatic status")<ref>{{cite web|url=http://grberridge.diplomacy.edu/Teaching/display.asp?Topic=DictionaryA-C |title=G. R. Berridge website |publisher=Grberridge.diplomacy.edu |date= |accessdate=2012-01-09}}</ref> or any overt criminal act such as [[drug trafficking]]. The declaration may also be a symbolic indication of displeasure. So-called "[[tit-for-tat]]" exchanges have occurred, notably during the [[Cold War]]. In 2011, a notable occurrence was an exchange between the [[United States]] and [[Ecuador]].<ref>{{cite news|title=US Expels Ecuadorian ambassador|url=http://www.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/04/07/ecuador.ambassador/index.html?iref=obnetwork|work=CNN.com|accessdate=8 April 2011|date=8 April 2011}}</ref> In 2012,[[John Baird (Canadian politician)|John Baird]] announced his government's listing of Iran as a state sponsor of [[terrorism]] under the [[Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act]].<ref>{{cite news|title=Canada closes embassy in Iran, expels Iranian diplomats|url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2012/09/07/pol-baird-canada-iran-embassy.html|work=CBC.ca|accessdate=7 September 2012|date=7 September 2012}}</ref> |
With the protection of mission staff from prosecution for violating civil and [[criminal law]]s, depending on rank, under Articles 41 and 42 of the Vienna Convention, they are bound to respect national laws and regulations. Breaches of these articles can lead to a ''persona non grata'' declaration being used to punish erring staff. It is also used to expel diplomats suspected of [[espionage]] (described as "activities incompatible with diplomatic status")<ref>{{cite web|url=http://grberridge.diplomacy.edu/Teaching/display.asp?Topic=DictionaryA-C |title=G. R. Berridge website |publisher=Grberridge.diplomacy.edu |date= |accessdate=2012-01-09}}</ref> or any overt criminal act such as [[drug trafficking]]. The declaration may also be a symbolic indication of displeasure. So-called "[[tit-for-tat]]" exchanges have occurred, notably during the [[Cold War]]. In 2011, a notable occurrence was an exchange between the [[United States]] and [[Ecuador]].<ref>{{cite news|title=US Expels Ecuadorian ambassador|url=http://www.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/04/07/ecuador.ambassador/index.html?iref=obnetwork|work=CNN.com|accessdate=8 April 2011|date=8 April 2011}}</ref> In 2012, [[John Baird (Canadian politician)|John Baird]] announced his government's listing of Iran as a state sponsor of [[terrorism]] under the [[Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act]].<ref>{{cite news|title=Canada closes embassy in Iran, expels Iranian diplomats|url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2012/09/07/pol-baird-canada-iran-embassy.html|work=CBC.ca|accessdate=7 September 2012|date=7 September 2012}}</ref> |
||
{{IPA|}} |
{{IPA|}} |
||
Revision as of 00:33, 20 January 2015
In diplomacy, the term persona non grata (Latin, plural: personae non gratae), literally meaning "an unwelcome person," refers to a foreign person whose entering or remaining in a particular country is prohibited by that country's government. It is the most serious form of censure which one country can apply to foreign diplomats, who are otherwise protected by diplomatic immunity from arrest and other normal kinds of prosecution.
Diplomacy
Under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations Article 9, a receiving State may "at any time and without having to explain its decision" declare any member of a diplomatic staff persona non grata. A person so declared is considered unacceptable and is usually recalled to his or her home nation. If not recalled, the receiving State "may refuse to recognize the person concerned as a member of the mission."[1]
With the protection of mission staff from prosecution for violating civil and criminal laws, depending on rank, under Articles 41 and 42 of the Vienna Convention, they are bound to respect national laws and regulations. Breaches of these articles can lead to a persona non grata declaration being used to punish erring staff. It is also used to expel diplomats suspected of espionage (described as "activities incompatible with diplomatic status")[2] or any overt criminal act such as drug trafficking. The declaration may also be a symbolic indication of displeasure. So-called "tit-for-tat" exchanges have occurred, notably during the Cold War. In 2011, a notable occurrence was an exchange between the United States and Ecuador.[3] In 2012, John Baird announced his government's listing of Iran as a state sponsor of terrorism under the Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act.[4]
Non-diplomatic usage
In non-diplomatic usage, referring to someone as persona non grata is to say that he or she is ostracized. Such a person is for all intents and purposes culturally shunned, so as to be figuratively nonexistent.
In police circles, this term is often applied to any officer who broke the "Blue Wall" by informing against fellow officers; for example as in the case of Frank Serpico, who famously testified against officers who were corrupt.
In one particular military usage, Cavalry Officer James Hewitt had been declared persona non grata at his former barracks after he had revealed that he had slept with Princess Diana.
In popular culture
In the Showtime series Homeland S04 E12, Saul is threatened by the fact that he may become persona non grata to the Pakistan government if a video featuring him, taken by a known terrorist Hakkani is uploaded online.
See also
References
- ^ "Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations". eDiplomat. Article 9. Retrieved 18 February 2014.
- ^ "G. R. Berridge website". Grberridge.diplomacy.edu. Retrieved 2012-01-09.
- ^ "US Expels Ecuadorian ambassador". CNN.com. 8 April 2011. Retrieved 8 April 2011.
- ^ "Canada closes embassy in Iran, expels Iranian diplomats". CBC.ca. 7 September 2012. Retrieved 7 September 2012.
External links
