Jump to content

User talk:Tyrenius: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by MadmanBot (talk) to last version by Bus stop
Tyrenius (talk | contribs)
Line 84: Line 84:
==Happy Holiday==
==Happy Holiday==
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JcXW0Se4HMs...[[User:Modernist|Modernist]] ([[User talk:Modernist|talk]]) 14:55, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JcXW0Se4HMs...[[User:Modernist|Modernist]] ([[User talk:Modernist|talk]]) 14:55, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
:Thanks. I hope you are well. '''''[[User:Tyrenius|<font color="#880088">Ty</font>]]''''' 02:07, 26 January 2015 (UTC)


==Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity==
==Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity==

Revision as of 02:07, 26 January 2015


Put new messages at the bottom of this page.

I may reply here, so watchlist this page, if you leave a post.

Talk Page Archives
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
1: Jan - May 4: Jan - Feb   9: Jan - Jun 11: Jan - Jun 13: Jan - Jun
2: Jun - Aug 5: Mar 10: Jul - Dec 12: Jul - Dec 14: Jul - Dec
3: Sep - Dec 6: Apr - Jun      
  7: Jul - Sep      
  8: Oct - Dec     How to archive
Claude Monet. Charing Cross Bridge
Claude Monet. Charing Cross Bridge


"Remember what we are doing here. We are building a free encyclopedia for every single person on the planet. We are trying to do it in an atmosphere of fun, love, and respect for others. We try to be kind to others, thoughtful in our actions, and professional in our approach to our responsibilities." Jimbo Wales



Tyrenius is taking a wikibreak till further notice.

Request for comment

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Depiction of women artists in art history is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Depiction of women artists in art history (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sionk (talk) 06:41, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification motion

A case (The Troubles) in which you were involved has been modified by motion which changed the wording of the discretionary sanctions section to clarify that the scope applies to pages, not just articles. For the arbitration committee --S Philbrick(Talk) 21:04, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holiday

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JcXW0Se4HMs...Modernist (talk) 14:55, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I hope you are well. Ty 02:07, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Information icon Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dz8bGvQwrtk...Bus stop (talk) 03:37, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]