Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad A. Agha: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 17:37, 11 February 2015

Muhammad A. Agha

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There seems to be no sources indicating the notability of Agha and the entire article seems to be an advert for him. http://www.so.undp.org/content/rbas/en/home/presscenter/articles/2011/02/20/-corporate-social-responsibility-in-iraq-brainstorming-meeting-in-erbil-20th-february-2011-.html is the only real source in the article and mentions him by name. The Reuters, http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSnBw115171a+100+BSW20140811?irpc=932, is nothing more than a photograph that has him standing in the background and no mention in the article. The other sources are to Linkedin and so are not really reliable. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:53, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the final version of the article. There is no intention to advertise Agha and rather generate a comprehensive profile for him. This is being conducted on the basis of his reference availability with more than 70% of the information provided. The language can be amended to avoid the presentation of adver. Please advise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JuleyBaker (talk • contribs) 13:02, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I reworked the text and removed photos. Honestly, I do not see the content as not credible or flawed. Neither as adver. It is a well informed platform that is giving 360 degrees information about the individual.

Please REMOVE the DELETION notice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JuleyBaker (talk • contribs) 13:54, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per the reasons by CambridgeBayWeather: the article doesn't sufficiently demonstrate his WP:Notability, I have restored the deletion discussion template,Sadads (talk) 15:32, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with JuleyBaker. This is an individual who has served in private and public capacities and is clearly an individual that Wiki searches would like to see. The information is credible, with pictures of him with global icons. The flow of information also is appealing.

I suggest to improve the language though.

Certainly a DELETION notice or any sign of controversy on what I see is not fair. As a Wiki user, I'd like to have access to such profiles with high density of data.

Thank you for highlighting this matter to my attention. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mhdalagha (talk • contribs) 15:41, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Impressive fixes. I add my voice to Juley and mhdalagha. Wiki should keep it. Please remove DELETION notice.

Revision as of 15:42, 11 February 2015 edit SineBot (talk \| contribs) Bots 2,548,745 edits m Signing comment by Mhdalagha - "→‎Muhammad A. Agha: Feedback on article - individual profile." ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:37, 11 February 2015 edit undo Hamedhammady (talk \| contribs) 10 edits →‎Muhammad A. Agha: Added feedback on content. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Next edit →
Line 20:		Line 20:

	Thank you for highlighting this matter to my attention. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Mhdalagha\|Mhdalagha]] ([[User talk:Mhdalagha\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Mhdalagha\|contribs]]) 15:41, 11 February 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->		Thank you for highlighting this matter to my attention. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Mhdalagha\|Mhdalagha]] ([[User talk:Mhdalagha\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Mhdalagha\|contribs]]) 15:41, 11 February 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

			Impressive fixes. I add my voice to Juley and mhdalagha. Wiki should keep it. Please remove DELETION notice.