User talk:TheCoffeeAddict

NOTE: If you leave a message here, I will reply here and leave a talkback on your page. If you want me to reply on your talk page, please tell me in the message. Thank you.

re Gerald Hannon

(Personal attack removed) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.147.111.85 (talk) 18:25, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

This wasn't a personal attack but a critiquing of your editing style. But talk pages are owned by the user and re-factoring by third parties is strictly forbidden. Just my two cents. --Ankit Maity _{«T § C»} 13:13, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

OK, I won't do this again. Sorry. pcfan500talk|my contribs 13:15, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015

re the Ynglings; Thank you for your advice. I guess I'll will be able to handle the technical bit better in the future! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kewuck (talk • contribs)

Regarding the deletion of Felix Nihamin & Associates, PC

Why would you resort to interfere in such a matter without prior information about the business. Microsoft is there on wikipedia as well, by that logic they should be deleted too, since it comes down to promotional material at the end of the day too.

The page has just been created and information is being added to it as we speak so that it can be maintained as a form of identity for the firm.

If the page is deleted upon your request then it shall be added again, and should any form of interference from your end without full information about our actions deter us from our work, then legal action shall be taken against you.

Hope this clears matters. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Felix Nihamin 1 (talk • contribs) 11:56, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

You are not allowed to make legal threats on Wikipedia. Also, your company does not meet the requirements for notability. pcfan500talk|my contribs 12:20, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Congratulations

	The Anti-Vandalism + STiki Barnstar
	Congratulations, Pcfan500! You're receiving this barnstar because you recently crossed the 1,000 classification threshold using STiki. We thank you both for your contributions to Wikipedia at-large and your use of the tool. We hope you continue your ascent up the leaderboard and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! West.andrew.g (developer) and Widr (talk) 06:04, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Thank you!!! pcfan500talk|my contribs 03:26, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Israeli Firster CENSORSHIP

I think the least YOU can do is to give your real name is you are going to edit others work as YOU don't think it contributes to the conversation. That is what you call chicken shite journalistic bullying.

How freaking dare you edit it under some BS name.

I thought and many others think the control of this story is a very distorted and one side and YOU JUST PROVED MY VERY POINT.

Do you censor ALL people who disagree with Israel?

What is YOUR name? +

Jack Jett (MY NAME-MY COMMENT) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jack E. Jett (talk • contribs) 16:36, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

We have a right to anonymity to Wikipedia and I refuse to reveal my name. Read Wikipedia:Username policy. It says that "it can be your real name, if you so choose". I choose not to use my real name. Wikipedia is not censored. You are adding a large amount of content that contravenes Wikipedia:NPOV and it is also unsourced. Also, there is no need to be aggressive. I am open to civil discussion. TheCoffeeAddict talk|contribs 23:03, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Just to be clear.

You are a high school student in Hong Kong who drinks a lot of coffee and within the Wikipedia rules you have the right to delete information made by others just because it differs from your opinion. Please be specific to what was incorrect. I have since researched this sort of activity and clearly from reading your (in your opinion) contributions you follow certain people and censor anything they post.

Add to that the fact that you can do this anonymously now helps me have a better understanding how to utilize Wikipedia in the future. I am at a disadvantage as you know who I am and clearly have a bias, yet I haven't a clue as to who you are. Tell me what it is that I can do to get you off my back. Am I just out of luck?

And this is a civil question. It seems as though you have some level of prejudice that needs to be addressed as there is a commonality in who YOU choose to edit. What is your particular prejudice towards me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jack E. Jett (talk • contribs) 16:48, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

I have no prejudice towards anyone. Your content must be sourced. Do not re-make the edit until you have a verifiable source. Please be civil. You are not supposed to edit with a biased point of view. Wikipedia is neutral. TheCoffeeAddict talk|contribs 00:47, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

ANI thread

Your last link does not work. ―Mandruss ☎ 08:21, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Fixed. Thanks for letting me know. TheCoffeeAddict talk|contribs 08:30, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Regarding the proposed speedy deletion of the New Zealand School of Export

I was wondering if I might have some reasons for the speedy deletion decision as this is the first Wikipage I have tried to put together and using the old literary advice about 'writing about something you know' that is exactly what I did. I also ensured that the support of the page by giving the links to the many external sources was in place. The New Zealand School of Export is an institution with many unique features including its charitable (not for profit) status. My concern is that Wikipedia carries lots of pages on our commercial overseas competitors but New Zealand doesn't get the same breaks as the big US corporate-funded schools. Is this a bias Wikipedia needs to address so as not to simply become a mouthpiece for the multinationals? How can we rewrite the page so as to ensure that New Zealand gets equality with overseas as we cannot compete on size or age of institutions! Any help would be very gratefully received as it is too easy to destroy but much harder to build. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.114.179.205 (talk) 22:53, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Recent edit to OK Computer

I simply changed the link to the correct pistol. the SAA was not the gun being referenced.