Talk:Coverity: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 11:07, 31 March 2015

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Computing: Software Stub‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Computer Security: Computing Stub‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles

Stub

This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Companies Stub‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Cpplint

This is personal experience, so I'm not prepared to change the original article, but I don't think ccplint should be mentioned as a competitor to Coverity. We've just performed a two day evaluation with Coverity, and ccplint has an entirely different function and purpose.

Also, it's refershing to know Google advocates One True Brace! --Woolhiser (talk) 20:01, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Links

Links [3] and [4] are broken — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.97.87.228 (talk) 17:52, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

LibreOffice

Should be cited => LibreOffice Makes Strides in Software Quality with Coverity Scan --Kizar (talk) 11:07, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 Links [3] and [4] are broken  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/129.97.87.228|129.97.87.228]] ([[User talk:129.97.87.228|talk]]) 17:52, 2 January 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+== LibreOffice ==
+Should be cited => [http://www.coverity.com/press-releases/libreoffice-makes-strides-in-software-quality-with-coverity-scan/ LibreOffice Makes Strides in Software Quality with Coverity Scan] --[[User:Kizar|Kizar]] ([[User talk:Kizar|talk]]) 11:07, 31 March 2015 (UTC)