Talk:Garissa University College attack: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 06:07, 3 April 2015

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Garissa University College attack article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Africa: Kenya Start‑class Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Kenya portal This article is supported by WikiProject Kenya (assessed as Low-importance).

Terrorism Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on terrorism, individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TerrorismWikipedia:WikiProject TerrorismTemplate:WikiProject TerrorismTerrorism articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A news item involving Garissa University College attack was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 2 April 2015.

Wikipedia

Numbers of victims

In our introductory sentence we say 15 were dead. But in the infobox we say 70. This needs to be clarified. No explanation provided about the source behind 70 dead although 15 dead is duly sourced. werldwayd (talk) 16:49, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I was confused when I first saw the article as well. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 17:05, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

When this story is no longer current as "news" and has fallen greatly from favor of popular media, will it be moved into the main article "Garissa University College" ? I have seen in some Wikipedia main entries that such sensational stories appear to be separately written or rewritten before they appear stories in the main entry. Wayne Roberson, Austin, Texas (talk) 03:54, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Islamic terrorism

As I have explained, that article is not updated. I have explained and added specific related instances instead. Further, if we were to have blanket lists here then we can add the whole harem of "List of terrorist incidents, XXXX" and massively inflate the "See also."

Also judging by his edits, he seems hell bent on criticizing Islamic politics (as he did in the Iran-"led" Southern Syrian Offensive page.120.62.24.165 (talk) 05:40, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

this attack was islamic terrorism. the list i added is a list of islamic terror incidents. it's relevant to the article.SyriaWarLato (talk) 05:53, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"As I have explained, that article is not updated." + "then we can add the whole harem of "List of terrorist incidents, XXXX" and massively inflate the "See also.""

Please don't just listen to yourself and presume you've gained consensus. That is not how Wikipedia works.120.62.24.165 (talk) 05:58, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

as i said. japanese hostage crisis has no relevance to this article. also the list I added is exactly for deflating the "see also" section, since it contains most recent terrorists incidentsSyriaWarLato (talk) 06:02, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As explained MORE than once for the context of POLITICAL hostage sieges the said user insists on only seeing what he wants to. [1]

It does not deflate as it is not updated AND "then we can add the whole harem of "List of terrorist incidents, XXXX" and massively inflate the "See also.""120.62.24.165 (talk) 06:05, 3 April 2015 (UTC)::::As explained MORE than once for the context of POLITICAL hostage sieges the said user insists on only seeing what he wants to. [2][reply]

It does not deflate as it is not updated AND "then we can add the whole harem of "List of terrorist incidents, XXXX" and massively inflate the "See also.""

Get consensus BEFORE readdition120.62.24.165 (talk) 06:05, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

His only addition to this page (and the other) is his blind insistence on having his way of adding "Islamic" terrorism. One can note this from the edit history.120.62.24.165 (talk) 06:07, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 ::::It does not deflate as it is not updated AND "then we can add the whole harem of "List of terrorist incidents, XXXX" and massively inflate the "See also.""
 ::::Get consensus BEFORE readdition[[Special:Contributions/120.62.24.165|120.62.24.165]] ([[User talk:120.62.24.165|talk]]) 06:05, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
+::::His only addition to this page (and the other) is his blind insistence on having his way of adding "Islamic" terrorism. One can note this from the edit history.[[Special:Contributions/120.62.24.165|120.62.24.165]] ([[User talk:120.62.24.165|talk]]) 06:07, 3 April 2015 (UTC)