User talk:FlightTime: Difference between revisions
Hired Ghoul (talk | contribs) |
Hired Ghoul (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
[[User:Hired Ghoul|Hired Ghoul]] ([[User talk:Hired Ghoul|talk]]) 05:48, 4 April 2015 (UTC) |
[[User:Hired Ghoul|Hired Ghoul]] ([[User talk:Hired Ghoul|talk]]) 05:48, 4 April 2015 (UTC) |
||
You are very persistent also. Why don't you ask me if I need help? |
|||
[[User:Hired Ghoul|Hired Ghoul]] ([[User talk:Hired Ghoul|talk]]) 05:50, 4 April 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:50, 4 April 2015
User talk:Mlpearc/TI User talk:Mlpearc/Header User:Mlpearc/I'm human
No RfXs since 08:57, 27 September 2024 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online |
Vn-17 | This user talk page has been Vandalised 17 times. |
Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 3 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Please block
Hello, Please block User:Calebbro as he changes information without citing any sources. Newest example - Tank. I didn't edit anything so that some idiot would come and change as he feels. Thanks in advance. Sabbatino (talk) 22:03, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- @Sabbatino: Sorry, no can do. I'm not an Admin. Mlpearc (open channel) 22:06, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- Then where can I report him? I decided to look at his contributions and looks like he makes trouble in more articles... Sabbatino (talk) 22:08, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- @Sabbatino: If it's a vandalism problem reports go here: Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism if it's an editing habits problem then here: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Mlpearc (open channel) 18:44, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Youtube Source
It is, as it is a claim by Padilla and Hecox themselves. See Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 186 and see the "Question on a Youtube source" section. -- Joseph Prasad (talk) 19:44, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Your rejectoin of my correction
Hi there,
Your rejection of my correction to Michael Nesmith's page is in error. Please read Bette Nesmith's page as well as the Liquid Paper page. If my info is wrong, then so is the info on those pages. One does not need to cite references to state how old a person is during a given year, one only needs their previously established birthdate, and a calculator. Cheers! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deadwing2112 (talk • contribs) 01:46, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
- @Deadwing2112: It does need to be sourced see Help:Referencing for beginners
David Lee Roth
With each year, I am seeing this constant way. It takes me quite a long time to get myself up and going on here. Frustrated and stressed just to add something.
Hired Ghoul (talk) 05:39, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
- @Hired Ghoul: If you would do it correctly it would most likely be left alone. See Help:Referencing for beginners Mlpearc (open channel) 05:44, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
But now, you've turned tables.
Making threats? what's this all about?
Answer me on that. I find it interesting.
Hired Ghoul (talk) 05:48, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
You are very persistent also. Why don't you ask me if I need help?