User talk:Klõps

2014 Meistriliiga

Hello, On the 2014 Meistriliiga page apart from under the table it only mentions the annulled matches once. If that is part of the Estonian football league rules then people will need to know how many annulled matches or least withdrawals each respective team has. Thanks Skyblueshaun (talk) 19:50, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for pointing that out to me. Appreciate it. Skyblueshaun (talk) 21:00, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Ways to improve Andrus Ansip's second cabinet

Hi, I'm Akifumii. Klõps, thanks for creating Andrus Ansip's second cabinet!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Great work. Please add some references as well as creating some articles for those red links.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Akifumii^Talk 22:29, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Estonia

Actually that is not consensus, there has been RfC's on the subject and they have failed to gain consensus to just use Estonia. There has just been a small number of strong POV pushers who keep changing articles to Estonia, but there has never been a consensus on the wiki to use just Estonia. Wiki-wide consensus has always remained that we use the name of the at the time of birth. -DJSasso (talk) 19:44, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

And here we go again... This "small number of POV pushers" for You are all estonian wikipedians?Klõps (talk) 19:47, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

There was no consensus for your changes, Klops. You should revert & seek a consensus for what you want. GoodDay (talk) 14:56, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

This article is about The Republic of Estonia from 1918-1940. For The modern Republic of Estonia, see Estonia.

About this sentence: give any source that Republic of Estonia between 1918 and 1940 is separate entity from the Republic of Estonia from 1992 onwards. Until You haven't done this I'll remove this sentence and move the page back. Here are again some sources that prove the continuity of the Republic of Estonia.

• D. Zalimas, Legal and Political Issues on the Continuity of the Republic of Lithuania, 1999, 4 Lithuanian Foreign Policy Review 111–12.
• Mälksoo, Lauri (2003). Illegal Annexation and State Continuity: The Case of the Incorporation of the Baltic States by the USSR. M. Nijhoff Publishers. ISBN 90-411-2177-3.
• Van Elsuwege, Peter (2003). "State Continuity and its Consequences: The Case of the Baltic States". Leiden Journal of International Law (Cambridge Journals) 16: pp.377–388. doi:10.1017/S0922156503001195.
• Ziemele, Ineta (2005). State Continuity and Nationality: The Baltic States and Russia. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. ISBN 90-04-14295-9.

Please do not restore Your edits before You have sources for Your claims! --Klõps (talk)

I haven't restored anything. As a member of WP:RETENTION, I just don't want to see you ending up blocked. GoodDay (talk) 20:05, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Is this a kind of streets are dark in here threat? This article used to be a redirect. Then it was turned into a crappy article with unsourced claims. You took part of the AfD making Your POV statments there (Keep due to the Estonian Soviet Socialist Republic having existed from 1940 to 1991. GoodDay). You were given sources that prove that that the Republic of Estonia before the Soviet era is the same and continuous with the Republic of Estonia after the Soviet era. Find sources that say that there is no state continuation and then come back. --Klõps (talk) 20:25, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

I'm speaking of WP:BRD, which you haven't been respecting. What you're arguing for isn't the issue. Your tendency to edit-war is the issue. If you want to continue the way you are, then that's your choice. GoodDay (talk) 20:28, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

You Yourself have also haven't shown any respect for BRD. And it is more than strange for You to act like judge if You have been part of this nasty business. The no consensus AfD isn't anything to push on here. The one who turned this redirect into article really loves infoboxes but isn't quite at home in history. His other similar edits have been nullified like AfD:Ireland (1937-1949). the article itself had two copy-paste paragraphs going against principal hierarchy of articles that these should be going from the general to the detailed. Then You and Your friend came along and started barricade edit war. --Klõps (talk) 21:44, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

April 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Estonian Soviet Socialist Republic. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Latvian Soviet Socialist Republic. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lithuanian Soviet Socialist Republic. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Republics of the Soviet Union. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

81.235.159.105 (talk) 11:37, 11 April 2015 (UTC)