Jump to content

Talk:Particle number operator: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:


This article needs work. As it stand, it's a contextless equation mini-collection. Did someone get up for coffee and then forget to finish writing it?
This article needs work. As it stand, it's a contextless equation mini-collection. Did someone get up for coffee and then forget to finish writing it?
--I'm actually rather surprised that the article has such a long history, yet is so little advanced. I'll take a look at that.


Okay, it was a crazy edit on April 18 (maybe vandalism, or just inexperience?). I undid it back to the last clean version, the one by [[User:Christian75|Christian75]].
I put in a coherently lede sentence and broke a few sentences into parts. The sentences I decomposed make as little sense as they did before.


I'm actually rather surprised that this page has a long history, yet is so little advanced. I'll take a look at that.
[[Special:Contributions/178.38.89.67|178.38.89.67]] ([[User talk:178.38.89.67|talk]]) 17:08, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
[[Special:Contributions/178.38.89.67|178.38.89.67]] ([[User talk:178.38.89.67|talk]]) 17:08, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:29, 25 April 2015

WikiProject iconPhysics Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article makes little sense

This article needs work. As it stand, it's a contextless equation mini-collection. Did someone get up for coffee and then forget to finish writing it? --I'm actually rather surprised that the article has such a long history, yet is so little advanced. I'll take a look at that.

Okay, it was a crazy edit on April 18 (maybe vandalism, or just inexperience?). I undid it back to the last clean version, the one by Christian75.

178.38.89.67 (talk) 17:08, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]