Jump to content

Differential of a function: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Differentials in several variables: moving relevant discussion here from total derivative
SindHind (talk | contribs)
m Adding/improving reference(s)
Line 26: Line 26:


According to {{harvtxt|Boyer|1959|p=12}}, Cauchy's approach was a significant logical improvement over the infinitesimal approach of Leibniz because, instead of invoking the metaphysical notion of infinitesimals, the quantities ''dy'' and ''dx'' could now be manipulated in exactly the same manner as any other real quantities
According to {{harvtxt|Boyer|1959|p=12}}, Cauchy's approach was a significant logical improvement over the infinitesimal approach of Leibniz because, instead of invoking the metaphysical notion of infinitesimals, the quantities ''dy'' and ''dx'' could now be manipulated in exactly the same manner as any other real quantities
in a meaningful way. Cauchy's overall conceptual approach to differentials remains the standard one in modern analytical treatments,<ref>{{harvnb|Courant|1937i|loc=II, §9}}: "Here we remark merely in passing that it is possible to use this approximate representation of the increment &Delta;''y'' by the linear expression ''h&fnof;''(''x'') to construct a logically satisfactory definition of a "differential", as was done by Cauchy in particular."</ref> although the final word on rigor, a fully modern notion of the limit, was ultimately due to [[Karl Weierstrass]].<ref>{{harvnb|Boyer|1959|p=284}}</ref>
in a meaningful way. Cauchy's overall conceptual approach to differentials remains the standard one in modern analytical treatments,<ref>{{harvnb|Courant|1937a|loc=II, §9}}: "Here we remark merely in passing that it is possible to use this approximate representation of the increment &Delta;''y'' by the linear expression ''h&fnof;''(''x'') to construct a logically satisfactory definition of a "differential", as was done by Cauchy in particular."</ref> although the final word on rigor, a fully modern notion of the limit, was ultimately due to [[Karl Weierstrass]].<ref>{{harvnb|Boyer|1959|p=284}}</ref>


In physical treatments, such as those applied to the theory of [[thermodynamics]], the infinitesimal view still prevails. {{harvtxt|Courant|John|1999|p=184}} reconcile the physical use of infinitesimal differentials with the mathematical impossibility of them as follows. The differentials represent finite non-zero values that are smaller than the degree of accuracy required for the particular purpose for which they are intended. Thus "physical infinitesimals" need not appeal to a corresponding mathematical infinitesimal in order to have a precise sense.
In physical treatments, such as those applied to the theory of [[thermodynamics]], the infinitesimal view still prevails. {{harvtxt|Courant|John|1999|p=184}} reconcile the physical use of infinitesimal differentials with the mathematical impossibility of them as follows. The differentials represent finite non-zero values that are smaller than the degree of accuracy required for the particular purpose for which they are intended. Thus "physical infinitesimals" need not appeal to a corresponding mathematical infinitesimal in order to have a precise sense.
Line 35: Line 35:


[[File:Sentido geometrico del diferencial de una funcion.png|thumb|The differential of a function ''&fnof;''(''x'') at a point&nbsp;''x''<sub>0</sub>.]]
[[File:Sentido geometrico del diferencial de una funcion.png|thumb|The differential of a function ''&fnof;''(''x'') at a point&nbsp;''x''<sub>0</sub>.]]
The differential is defined in modern treatments of differential calculus as follows.<ref>See, for instance, the influential treatises of {{harvnb|Courant|1937i}}, {{harvnb|Kline|1977}}, {{harvnb|Goursat|1904}}, and {{harvnb|Hardy|1905}}. Tertiary sources for this definition include also {{harvnb|Tolstov|2001}} and {{harvnb|Ito|1993|loc=§106}}.</ref> The differential of a function ''f''(''x'') of a single real variable ''x'' is the function ''df'' of two independent real variables ''x'' and ''Δx'' given by
The differential is defined in modern treatments of differential calculus as follows.<ref>See, for instance, the influential treatises of {{harvnb|Courant|1937a}}, {{harvnb|Kline|1977}}, {{harvnb|Goursat|1904}}, and {{harvnb|Hardy|1905}}. Tertiary sources for this definition include also {{harvnb|Tolstov|2001}} and {{harvnb|Ito|1993|loc=§106}}.</ref> The differential of a function ''f''(''x'') of a single real variable ''x'' is the function ''df'' of two independent real variables ''x'' and ''Δx'' given by


:<math>df(x, \Delta x) \stackrel{\rm{def}}{=} f'(x)\,\Delta x.</math>
:<math>df(x, \Delta x) \stackrel{\rm{def}}{=} f'(x)\,\Delta x.</math>
Line 74: Line 74:
which is the principal part of the change in ''y'' resulting from changes in the independent variables&nbsp;''x''<sub>''i''</sub>.
which is the principal part of the change in ''y'' resulting from changes in the independent variables&nbsp;''x''<sub>''i''</sub>.


More precisely, in the context of multivariable calculus, following {{harvtxt|Courant|1937ii}}, if ''f'' is a differentiable function, then by the [[Fréchet derivative|definition of the differentiability]], the increment
More precisely, in the context of multivariable calculus, following {{harvtxt|Courant|1937b}}, if ''f'' is a differentiable function, then by the [[Fréchet derivative|definition of the differentiability]], the increment


:<math>\begin{align}
:<math>\begin{align}
Line 211: Line 211:


== Examples and applications ==
== Examples and applications ==
Differentials may be effectively used in [[numerical analysis]] to study the propagation of experimental errors in a calculation, and thus the overall [[numerical stability]] of a problem {{harv|Courant|1937i}}. Suppose that the variable ''x'' represents the outcome of an experiment and ''y'' is the result of a numerical computation applied to ''x''. The question is to what extent errors in the measurement of ''x'' influence the outcome of the computation of ''y''. If the ''x'' is known to within Δ''x'' of its true value, then [[Taylor's theorem]] gives the following estimate on the error Δ''y'' in the computation of ''y'':
Differentials may be effectively used in [[numerical analysis]] to study the propagation of experimental errors in a calculation, and thus the overall [[numerical stability]] of a problem {{harv|Courant|1937a}}. Suppose that the variable ''x'' represents the outcome of an experiment and ''y'' is the result of a numerical computation applied to ''x''. The question is to what extent errors in the measurement of ''x'' influence the outcome of the computation of ''y''. If the ''x'' is known to within Δ''x'' of its true value, then [[Taylor's theorem]] gives the following estimate on the error Δ''y'' in the computation of ''y'':
:<math>\Delta y = f'(x)\Delta x + \frac{(\Delta x)^2}{2}f''(\xi)</math>
:<math>\Delta y = f'(x)\Delta x + \frac{(\Delta x)^2}{2}f''(\xi)</math>
where ξ&nbsp;=&nbsp;''x''&nbsp;+&nbsp;θΔ''x'' for some 0&nbsp;<&nbsp;θ&nbsp;<&nbsp;1. If Δ''x'' is small, then the second order term is negligible, so that Δ''y'' is, for practical purposes, well-approximated by ''dy''&nbsp;=&nbsp;''f'''(''x'')Δ''x''.
where ξ&nbsp;=&nbsp;''x''&nbsp;+&nbsp;θΔ''x'' for some 0&nbsp;<&nbsp;θ&nbsp;<&nbsp;1. If Δ''x'' is small, then the second order term is negligible, so that Δ''y'' is, for practical purposes, well-approximated by ''dy''&nbsp;=&nbsp;''f'''(''x'')Δ''x''.
Line 231: Line 231:
*{{Citation | last1=Boyer | first1=Carl B. | author1-link=Carl Benjamin Boyer | title=The history of the calculus and its conceptual development | publisher=[[Dover Publications]] | location=New York | mr=0124178 | year=1959}}.
*{{Citation | last1=Boyer | first1=Carl B. | author1-link=Carl Benjamin Boyer | title=The history of the calculus and its conceptual development | publisher=[[Dover Publications]] | location=New York | mr=0124178 | year=1959}}.
*{{citation|first=Augustin-Louis|last=Cauchy|authorlink=Augustin-Louis Cauchy|chapter=<!--Quatrième leçon: Différentialles des fonctions d'une seule variable-->|title=Résumé des Leçons données à l'Ecole royale polytechnique sur les applications du calcul infinitésimal|year=1823|url=http://math-doc.ujf-grenoble.fr/cgi-bin/oeitem?id=OE_CAUCHY_2_4_9_0}}.
*{{citation|first=Augustin-Louis|last=Cauchy|authorlink=Augustin-Louis Cauchy|chapter=<!--Quatrième leçon: Différentialles des fonctions d'une seule variable-->|title=Résumé des Leçons données à l'Ecole royale polytechnique sur les applications du calcul infinitésimal|year=1823|url=http://math-doc.ujf-grenoble.fr/cgi-bin/oeitem?id=OE_CAUCHY_2_4_9_0}}.
*{{Citation | last1=Courant | first1=Richard |authorlink=Richard Courant | title=Differential and integral calculus. Vol. I | publisher=[[John Wiley & Sons]] | location=New York | series=Wiley Classics Library | isbn=978-0-471-60842-4 | mr=1009558 | year=1937i|publication-date=1988}}.
*{{Citation | last1=Courant | first1=Richard |authorlink=Richard Courant | title=Differential and integral calculus. Vol. I | publisher=[[John Wiley & Sons]] | location=New York | series=Wiley Classics Library | isbn=978-0-471-60842-4 | mr=1009558 | year=1937a|publication-date=1988}}.
*{{Citation | last1=Courant | first1=Richard | authorlink=Richard Courant |title=Differential and integral calculus. Vol. II | publisher=[[John Wiley & Sons]] | location=New York | series=Wiley Classics Library | isbn=978-0-471-60840-0 | mr=1009559 | year=1937ii|publication-date=1988}}.
*{{Citation | last1=Courant | first1=Richard | authorlink=Richard Courant |title=Differential and integral calculus. Vol. II | publisher=[[John Wiley & Sons]] | location=New York | series=Wiley Classics Library | isbn=978-0-471-60840-0 | mr=1009559 | year=1937b|publication-date=1988}}.
*{{Citation | last1=Courant | first1=Richard | authorlink1=Richard Courant| last2=John | first2=Fritz |authorlink2=Fritz John| title=Introduction to Calculus and Analysis Volume 1|series=Classics in Mathematics| publisher=[[Springer-Verlag]] | location=Berlin, New York | isbn=3-540-65058-X | year=1999 | mr=1746554 }}
*{{Citation | last1=Courant | first1=Richard | authorlink1=Richard Courant| last2=John | first2=Fritz |authorlink2=Fritz John| title=Introduction to Calculus and Analysis Volume 1|series=Classics in Mathematics| publisher=[[Springer-Verlag]] | location=Berlin, New York | isbn=3-540-65058-X | year=1999 | mr=1746554 }}
* {{Citation| author1-link=David Eisenbud|first1=David|last1=Eisenbud|author2-link=Joe Harris (mathematician)|first2=Joe|last2=Harris| year = 1998 |title = The Geometry of Schemes| publisher = Springer-Verlag| isbn = 0-387-98637-5}}.
* {{Citation| author1-link=David Eisenbud|first1=David|last1=Eisenbud|author2-link=Joe Harris (mathematician)|first2=Joe|last2=Harris| year = 1998 |title = The Geometry of Schemes| publisher = Springer-Verlag| isbn = 0-387-98637-5}}.

Revision as of 22:43, 2 September 2015

In calculus, the differential represents the principal part of the change in a function y = f(x) with respect to changes in the independent variable. The differential dy is defined by

where is the derivative of f with respect to x, and dx is an additional real variable (so that dy is a function of x and dx). The notation is such that the equation

holds, where the derivative is represented in the Leibniz notation dy/dx, and this is consistent with regarding the derivative as the quotient of the differentials. One also writes

The precise meaning of the variables dy and dx depends on the context of the application and the required level of mathematical rigor. The domain of these variables may take on a particular geometrical significance if the differential is regarded as a particular differential form, or analytical significance if the differential is regarded as a linear approximation to the increment of a function. Traditionally, the variables dx and dy are considered to be very small (infinitesimal), and this interpretation is made rigorous in non-standard analysis.

History and usage

The differential was first introduced via an intuitive or heuristic definition by Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, who thought of the differential dy as an infinitely small (or infinitesimal) change in the value y of the function, corresponding to an infinitely small change dx in the function's argument x. For that reason, the instantaneous rate of change of y with respect to x, which is the value of the derivative of the function, is denoted by the fraction

in what is called the Leibniz notation for derivatives. The quotient dy/dx is not infinitely small; rather it is a real number.

The use of infinitesimals in this form was widely criticized, for instance by the famous pamphlet The Analyst by Bishop Berkeley. Augustin-Louis Cauchy (1823) defined the differential without appeal to the atomism of Leibniz's infinitesimals.[1][2] Instead, Cauchy, following d'Alembert, inverted the logical order of Leibniz and his successors: the derivative itself became the fundamental object, defined as a limit of difference quotients, and the differentials were then defined in terms of it. That is, one was free to define the differential dy by an expression

in which dy and dx are simply new variables taking finite real values,[3] not fixed infinitesimals as they had been for Leibniz.[4]

According to Boyer (1959, p. 12), Cauchy's approach was a significant logical improvement over the infinitesimal approach of Leibniz because, instead of invoking the metaphysical notion of infinitesimals, the quantities dy and dx could now be manipulated in exactly the same manner as any other real quantities in a meaningful way. Cauchy's overall conceptual approach to differentials remains the standard one in modern analytical treatments,[5] although the final word on rigor, a fully modern notion of the limit, was ultimately due to Karl Weierstrass.[6]

In physical treatments, such as those applied to the theory of thermodynamics, the infinitesimal view still prevails. Courant & John (1999, p. 184) reconcile the physical use of infinitesimal differentials with the mathematical impossibility of them as follows. The differentials represent finite non-zero values that are smaller than the degree of accuracy required for the particular purpose for which they are intended. Thus "physical infinitesimals" need not appeal to a corresponding mathematical infinitesimal in order to have a precise sense.

Following twentieth-century developments in mathematical analysis and differential geometry, it became clear that the notion of the differential of a function could be extended in a variety of ways. In real analysis, it is more desirable to deal directly with the differential as the principal part of the increment of a function. This leads directly to the notion that the differential of a function at a point is a linear functional of an increment Δx. This approach allows the differential (as a linear map) to be developed for a variety of more sophisticated spaces, ultimately giving rise to such notions as the Fréchet or Gâteaux derivative. Likewise, in differential geometry, the differential of a function at a point is a linear function of a tangent vector (an "infinitely small displacement"), which exhibits it as a kind of one-form: the exterior derivative of the function. In non-standard calculus, differentials are regarded as infinitesimals, which can themselves be put on a rigorous footing (see differential (infinitesimal)).

Definition

The differential of a function ƒ(x) at a point x0.

The differential is defined in modern treatments of differential calculus as follows.[7] The differential of a function f(x) of a single real variable x is the function df of two independent real variables x and Δx given by

One or both of the arguments may be suppressed, i.e., one may see df(x) or simply df. If y = f(x), the differential may also be written as dy. Since dx(x, Δx) = Δx it is conventional to write dx = Δx, so that the following equality holds:

This notion of differential is broadly applicable when a linear approximation to a function is sought, in which the value of the increment Δx is small enough. More precisely, if f is a differentiable function at x, then the difference in y-values

satisfies

where the error ε in the approximation satisfies ε/Δx → 0 as Δx → 0. In other words, one has the approximate identity

in which the error can be made as small as desired relative to Δx by constraining Δx to be sufficiently small; that is to say,

as Δx → 0. For this reason, the differential of a function is known as the principal (linear) part in the increment of a function: the differential is a linear function of the increment Δx, and although the error ε may be nonlinear, it tends to zero rapidly as Δx tends to zero.

Differentials in several variables

Following Goursat (1904, I, §15), for functions of more than one independent variable,

the partial differential of y with respect to any one of the variables x1 is the principal part of the change in y resulting from a change dx1 in that one variable. The partial differential is therefore

involving the partial derivative of y with respect to x1. The sum of the partial differentials with respect to all of the independent variables is the total differential

which is the principal part of the change in y resulting from changes in the independent variables xi.

More precisely, in the context of multivariable calculus, following Courant (1937b), if f is a differentiable function, then by the definition of the differentiability, the increment

where the error terms ε i tend to zero as the increments Δxi jointly tend to zero. The total differential is then rigorously defined as

Since, with this definition,

one has

As in the case of one variable, the approximate identity holds

in which the total error can be made as small as desired relative to by confining attention to sufficiently small increments.

Application of the total differential to error estimation

In measurement, the total differential is used in estimating the error Δf of a function f based on the errors Δx, Δy, ... of the parameters x, y, .... Assuming that the interval is short enough for the change to be approximately linear:

Δf(x) = f'(x) × Δx

and that all variables are independent, then for all variables,

This is because the derivative fx with respect to the particular parameter x gives the sensitivity of the function f to a change in x, in particular the error Δx. As they are assumed to be independent, the analysis describes the worst-case scenario. The absolute values of the component errors are used, because after simple computation, the derivative may have a negative sign. From this principle the error rules of summation, multiplication etc. are derived, e.g.:

Let f(a, b) = a × b;
Δf = faΔa + fbΔb; evaluating the derivatives
Δf = bΔa + aΔb; dividing by f, which is a × b
Δf/f = Δa/a + Δb/b

That is to say, in multiplication, the total relative error is the sum of the relative errors of the parameters.

To illustrate how this depends on the function considered, consider the case where the function is f(a, b) = a ln b instead. Then, it can be computed that the error estimate is

Δf/f = Δa/a + Δb/(b ln b)

with an extra 'ln b' factor not found in the case of a simple product. This additional factor tends to make the error smaller, as ln b is not as large as a bare b.

Higher-order differentials

Higher-order differentials of a function y = f(x) of a single variable x can be defined via:[8]

and, in general,

Informally, this justifies Leibniz's notation for higher-order derivatives

When the independent variable x itself is permitted to depend on other variables, then the expression becomes more complicated, as it must include also higher order differentials in x itself. Thus, for instance,

and so forth.

Similar considerations apply to defining higher order differentials of functions of several variables. For example, if f is a function of two variables x and y, then

where is a binomial coefficient. In more variables, an analogous expression holds, but with an appropriate multinomial expansion rather than binomial expansion.[9]

Higher order differentials in several variables also become more complicated when the independent variables are themselves allowed to depend on other variables. For instance, for a function f of x and y which are allowed to depend on auxiliary variables, one has

Because of this notational infelicity, the use of higher order differentials was roundly criticized by Hadamard 1935, who concluded:

Enfin, que signifie ou que représente l'égalité
A mon avis, rien du tout.

That is: Finally, what is meant, or represented, by the equality [...]? In my opinion, nothing at all. In spite of this skepticism, higher order differentials did emerge as an important tool in analysis[10]

In these contexts, the nth order differential of the function f applied to an increment Δx is defined by

or an equivalent expression, such as

where is an nth forward difference with increment tΔx.

This definition makes sense as well if f is a function of several variables (for simplicity taken here as a vector argument). Then the nth differential defined in this way is a homogeneous function of degree n in the vector increment Δx. Furthermore, the Taylor series of f at the point x is given by

The higher order Gâteaux derivative generalizes these considerations to infinite dimensional spaces.

Properties

A number of properties of the differential follow in a straightforward manner from the corresponding properties of the derivative, partial derivative, and total derivative. These include:[11]

  • Linearity: For constants a and b and differentiable functions f and g,

An operation d with these two properties is known in abstract algebra as a derivation. They imply the Power rule

In addition, various forms of the chain rule hold, in increasing level of generality:[12]

  • If y = f(u) is a differentiable function of the variable u and u = g(x) is a differentiable function of x, then
Heuristically, the chain rule for several variables can itself be understood by dividing through both sides of this equation by the infinitely small quantity dt.
  • More general analogous expressions hold, in which the intermediate variables x i depend on more than one variable.

General formulation

A consistent notion of differential can be developed for a function f : Rn → Rm between two Euclidean spaces. Let xx ∈ Rn be a pair of Euclidean vectors. The increment in the function f is

If there exists an m × n matrix A such that

in which the vector ε → 0 as Δx → 0, then f is by definition differentiable at the point x. The matrix A is sometimes known as the Jacobian matrix, and the linear transformation that associates to the increment Δx ∈ Rn the vector AΔx ∈ Rm is, in this general setting, known as the differential df(x) of f at the point x. This is precisely the Fréchet derivative, and the same construction can be made to work for a function between any Banach spaces.

Another fruitful point of view is to define the differential directly as a kind of directional derivative:

which is the approach already taken for defining higher order differentials (and is most nearly the definition set forth by Cauchy). If t represents time and x position, then h represents a velocity instead of a displacement as we have heretofore regarded it. This yields yet another refinement of the notion of differential: that it should be a linear function of a kinematic velocity. The set of all velocities through a given point of space is known as the tangent space, and so df gives a linear function on the tangent space: a differential form. With this interpretation, the differential of f is known as the exterior derivative, and has broad application in differential geometry because the notion of velocities and the tangent space makes sense on any differentiable manifold. If, in addition, the output value of f also represents a position (in a Euclidean space), then a dimensional analysis confirms that the output value of df must be a velocity. If one treats the differential in this manner, then it is known as the pushforward since it "pushes" velocities from a source space into velocities in a target space.

Other approaches

Although the notion of having an infinitesimal increment dx is not well-defined in modern mathematical analysis, a variety of techniques exist for defining the infinitesimal differential so that the differential of a function can be handled in a manner that does not clash with the Leibniz notation. These include:

Examples and applications

Differentials may be effectively used in numerical analysis to study the propagation of experimental errors in a calculation, and thus the overall numerical stability of a problem (Courant 1937a). Suppose that the variable x represents the outcome of an experiment and y is the result of a numerical computation applied to x. The question is to what extent errors in the measurement of x influence the outcome of the computation of y. If the x is known to within Δx of its true value, then Taylor's theorem gives the following estimate on the error Δy in the computation of y:

where ξ = x + θΔx for some 0 < θ < 1. If Δx is small, then the second order term is negligible, so that Δy is, for practical purposes, well-approximated by dy = f'(xx.

The differential is often useful to rewrite a differential equation

in the form

in particular when one wants to separate the variables.

Notes

  1. ^ For a detailed historical account of the differential, see Boyer 1959, especially page 275 for Cauchy's contribution on the subject. An abbreviated account appears in Kline 1972, Chapter 40.
  2. ^ Cauchy explicitly denied the possibility of actual infinitesimal and infinite quantities (Boyer 1959, pp. 273–275), and took the radically different point of view that "a variable quantity becomes infinitely small when its numerical value decreases indefinitely in such a way as to converge to zero" (Cauchy 1823, p. 12; translation from Boyer 1959, p. 273).
  3. ^ Boyer 1959, p. 275
  4. ^ Boyer 1959, p. 12: "The differentials as thus defined are only new variables, and not fixed infinitesimals..."
  5. ^ Courant 1937a, II, §9: "Here we remark merely in passing that it is possible to use this approximate representation of the increment Δy by the linear expression (x) to construct a logically satisfactory definition of a "differential", as was done by Cauchy in particular."
  6. ^ Boyer 1959, p. 284
  7. ^ See, for instance, the influential treatises of Courant 1937a, Kline 1977, Goursat 1904, and Hardy 1905. Tertiary sources for this definition include also Tolstov 2001 and Ito 1993, §106.
  8. ^ Cauchy 1823. See also, for instance, Goursat 1904, I, §14.
  9. ^ Goursat 1904, I, §14
  10. ^ In particular to infinite dimensional holomorphy (Hille & Phillips 1974) and numerical analysis via the calculus of finite differences.
  11. ^ Goursat 1904, I, §17
  12. ^ Goursat 1904, I, §§14,16
  13. ^ Eisenbud & Harris 1998.
  14. ^ See Kock 2006 and Moerdijk & Reyes 1991.
  15. ^ See Robinson 1996 and Keisler 1986.

References