Inverse function theorem

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

In mathematics, specifically differential calculus, the inverse function theorem gives sufficient conditions for a function to be invertible in a neighborhood of a point in its domain. The theorem also gives a formula for the derivative of the inverse function. In multivariable calculus, this theorem can be generalized to any continuously differentiable, vector-valued function whose Jacobian determinant is nonzero at a point in its domain. In this case, the theorem gives a formula for the Jacobian matrix of the inverse. There are also versions of the inverse function theorem for complex holomorphic functions, for differentiable maps between manifolds, for differentiable functions between Banach spaces, and so forth.

Statement of the theorem[edit]

For functions of a single variable, the theorem states that if is a continuously differentiable function with nonzero derivative at the point , then is invertible in a neighborhood of , the inverse is continuously differentiable, and

where notationally the left side refers to the derivative of the inverse function evaluated at f(a).

For functions of more than one variable, the theorem states that if the total derivative of a continuously differentiable function defined from an open set of into is invertible at a point (i.e., the Jacobian determinant of at is non-zero), then is an invertible function near . That is, an inverse function to exists in some neighborhood of . Moreover, the inverse function is also continuously differentiable. In the infinite dimensional case it is required that the Fréchet derivative have a bounded inverse at . Finally, the theorem says that

where denotes matrix inverse and is the Jacobian matrix of the function at the point . This formula can also be derived from the chain rule. The chain rule states that for functions and which have total derivatives at and respectively,

Letting be and be , is the identity function, whose Jacobian matrix is also the identity. In this special case, the formula above can be solved for . Note that the chain rule assumes the existence of total derivative of the inside function , while the inverse function theorem proves that has a total derivative at . The existence of an inverse function to is equivalent to saying that the system of equations can be solved for in terms of if we restrict and to small enough neighborhoods of and , respectively.


Consider the vector-valued function from to defined by

Then the Jacobian matrix is

and the determinant is

The determinant is nonzero everywhere. By the theorem, for every point in , there exists a neighborhood about over which is invertible. Note that this is different than saying is invertible over its entire image. In this example, is not invertible because it is not injective (because ).

Notes on methods of proof[edit]

As an important result, the inverse function theorem has been given numerous proofs. The proof most commonly seen in textbooks relies on the contraction mapping principle, also known as the Banach fixed point theorem. (This theorem can also be used as the key step in the proof of existence and uniqueness of solutions to ordinary differential equations.) Since this theorem applies in infinite-dimensional (Banach space) settings, it is the tool used in proving the infinite-dimensional version of the inverse function theorem (see "Generalizations", below). An alternate proof (which works only in finite dimensions) instead uses as the key tool the extreme value theorem for functions on a compact set.[1] Yet another proof uses Newton's method, which has the advantage of providing an effective version of the theorem. That is, given specific bounds on the derivative of the function, an estimate of the size of the neighborhood on which the function is invertible can be obtained.[2]



The inverse function theorem can be generalized to differentiable maps between differentiable manifolds. In this context the theorem states that for a differentiable map , if the differential of ,

is a linear isomorphism at a point in then there exists an open neighborhood of such that

is a diffeomorphism. Note that this implies that and must have the same dimension at . If the derivative of is an isomorphism at all points in then the map is a local diffeomorphism.

Banach spaces[edit]

The inverse function theorem can also be generalized to differentiable maps between Banach spaces. Let and be Banach spaces and an open neighbourhood of the origin in . Let be continuously differentiable and assume that the derivative of at 0 is a bounded linear isomorphism of onto . Then there exists an open neighbourhood of in and a continuously differentiable map such that for all in . Moreover, is the only sufficiently small solution of the equation .

Banach manifolds[edit]

These two directions of generalization can be combined in the inverse function theorem for Banach manifolds.[3]

Constant rank theorem[edit]

The inverse function theorem (and the implicit function theorem) can be seen as a special case of the constant rank theorem, which states that a smooth map with constant rank near a point can be put in a particular normal form near that point.[4] Specifically, if has constant rank near a point , then there are open neighborhoods of and of and there are diffeomorphisms and such that and such that the derivative is equal to . That is, "looks like" its derivative near . Semicontinuity of the rank function implies that the set of points near which the derivative has constant rank is an open dense subset of the domain of the map. So the constant rank theorem applies "generically" across the domain.

When the derivative of is injective (resp. surjective) at a point , it is also injective (resp. surjective) in a neighborhood of , and hence the rank of is constant on that neighborhood, so the constant rank theorem applies.

Holomorphic Functions[edit]

If the Jacobian (in this context the matrix formed by the complex derivatives) of a holomorphic function , defined from an open set of into , is invertible at a point , then is an invertible function near . This follows immediately from the theorem above. One can also show, that this inverse is again a holomorphic function.[5]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ Michael Spivak, Calculus on Manifolds.
  2. ^ John H. Hubbard and Barbara Burke Hubbard, Vector Analysis, Linear Algebra, and Differential Forms: a unified approach, Matrix Editions, 2001.
  3. ^ Lang 1995, Lang 1999, pp. 15–19, 25–29.
  4. ^ William M. Boothby, An Introduction to Differentiable Manifolds and Riemannian Geometry, Revised Second Edition, Academic Press, 2002, ISBN 0-12-116051-3.
  5. ^ K. Fritzsche, H. Grauert, "From Holomorphic Functions to Complex Manifolds", Springer-Verlag, (2002). Page 33.


  • Lang, Serge (1995). Differential and Riemannian Manifolds. Springer. ISBN 0-387-94338-2. 
  • Lang, Serge (1999). Fundamentals of Differential Geometry. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. New York: Springer. ISBN 978-0-387-98593-0. 
  • Nijenhuis, Albert (1974). "Strong derivatives and inverse mappings". Amer. Math. Monthly 81 (9): 969–980. doi:10.2307/2319298. 
  • Renardy, Michael; Rogers, Robert C. (2004). An introduction to partial differential equations. Texts in Applied Mathematics 13 (Second ed.). New York: Springer-Verlag. pp. 337–338. ISBN 0-387-00444-0. 
  • Rudin, Walter (1976). Principles of mathematical analysis. International Series in Pure and Applied Mathematics (Third ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co. pp. 221–223.