User talk:IsraphelMac: Difference between revisions
IsraphelMac (talk | contribs) Response |
Cataclysm991 (talk | contribs) →Have look on this potential Autobiography: new section |
||
Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
:...and it looks like it's been done. [[User:TenOfAllTrades|TenOfAllTrades]]([[User_talk:TenOfAllTrades|talk]]) 19:28, 3 September 2015 (UTC) |
:...and it looks like it's been done. [[User:TenOfAllTrades|TenOfAllTrades]]([[User_talk:TenOfAllTrades|talk]]) 19:28, 3 September 2015 (UTC) |
||
:: Thank you. I wasn't really expecting a peaceful resolution (considering the person was resorting to name calling and personal attacks), but was worth a try. [[User:IsraphelMac|IsraphelMac]] ([[User talk:IsraphelMac#top|talk]]) 19:31, 3 September 2015 (UTC) |
:: Thank you. I wasn't really expecting a peaceful resolution (considering the person was resorting to name calling and personal attacks), but was worth a try. [[User:IsraphelMac|IsraphelMac]] ([[User talk:IsraphelMac#top|talk]]) 19:31, 3 September 2015 (UTC) |
||
== Have look on this potential Autobiography == |
|||
This article seems to be an autobiography, have a look: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siddharth_Sivakumar |
Revision as of 21:18, 3 September 2015
In response to your feedback
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your recent contributions. If you find that you need any help or have questions, you might want to stop by the Teahouse where new users can ask questions to experience editors in a comfortable and non-threatening environment. You also might want to check out the help desk or browse the help pages.
Topher385 (talk) 18:21, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Vancouver Aquarium (March 2013)
Hey IsraphelMac,
What is your definition of constructive?
The facts I posted aren't an opinion, they're truths. Don't young children researching this facility deserve to know both sides of the story from the point of view of the animals that are kept in captivity here? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AshyCrow (talk • contribs) 03:04, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
- The edits you made were not written from a Neutral Point of View. (WP:NPOV) Also, if the facts you posted aren't opinions, you should have some sources. (WP:VERIFY) If you do find some, then you should cite them on the article. (WP:CITE) If you don't have any, then it will likely be challenged and removed by another user on Wikipedia. Thanks! :) IsraphelMac (talk) 03:21, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
- Also, the third edit I made's comment should be NPOV and not vandalism IsraphelMac (talk)
AfC drafts
I just saw that you moved an WP:AFC draft from Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/... to Wikipedia:Articles for creation/... - it's deliberate that the drafts are in the Wikipedia talk namespace because IP editors can create talk pages, but not project pages. Since we like to keep all the drafts in one place, they're all at Wikipedia talk. Yours, Huon (talk) 00:25, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
- Hi! Sorry about that, I hadn't known that it was deliberate at the time. I'll be more careful next time. Thanks! IsraphelMac (talk) 03:33, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
Message added 23:49, 24 November 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
JMHamo (talk) 23:49, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/75/Cute_grey_kitten.jpg/150px-Cute_grey_kitten.jpg)
For being awesome at stopping vandalism!
PureRED (talk) 20:35, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you!! I try my best to stop vandals :P (the Charizard vandalism was just hilarious, too) IsraphelMac (talk) 20:49, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
September 2015
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Temple of Bel. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.66.250.200 (talk) 18:09, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
- Hello, according to Wikipedia's policy on reliable sources, the creator and publisher of the work must be reliable. infowars.com is run by Alex Jones, a known conspiracy theorist. Therefore, I cannot be certain that the content is 100% reliable and accurate. Please also read up on Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. IsraphelMac (talk) 18:16, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
- Inforwars is not run by "Alex Jones" and is a credible source. If you referred to my source, it had multiple links to multiple news agencies such as Press TV. A youtube channel as well with live interviews. Your opinion on who runs what website or who is a conspiracy theorist is irrelevant to the facts and sources provided. Please also stop using multiple accounts under the same IP address to bypass Wiki's policy on edit warring. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.66.250.200 (talk) 18:27, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
- If I go to infowars.com, the title of the page is "Alex Jones' Infowars". Then if I scroll down to the bottom of the page, I see a picture of Alex Jones. I cannot find any other sources other than PressTV that is more credible either. "Alex Jones (a conspiracy theorist) runs infowars.com" is not my opinion, but it is a fact. If he is a conspiracy theorist, then it absolutely is relevant to the facts and sources as that undermines his credibility as being a trustworthy source for Wikipedia. I am familiar with the policies of Wikipedia, and I do not use multiple accounts (or IPs) to bypass the policy on edit warring. Those other editors that reverted your edits share the same opinion as me (that it's just a conspiracy theory and has not been confirmed as fact), but we are not the same person. IsraphelMac (talk) 18:43, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
IsraphelMac, these warnings are disruptive and you can ignore them. --NeilN talk to me 18:44, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah, I know. I just wanted to explain to the editor why he/she is getting reverted. Thanks for intervening. IsraphelMac (talk) 18:44, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
In response to you VANDALISM with allegation Keep it NEUTRAL read first the official Congressional Record
Wikipedia is NOT the source of rumors, bias or propaganda!
It MUST be credible!
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CREC-1998-10-20/html/CREC-1998-10-20-pt1-PgE2244-2.htm] Congressional Record Government Publishing Office / Congressional Record Volume 144, Number 150 (Tuesday, October 20, 1998) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.239.155.158 (talk) 19:15, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
- I've requested a block at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Request block of 141.239.155.158. I could do it myself, but it will avoid the usual nuisance abuse-of-power unblock requests if another admin pushes the button. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 19:27, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
- ...and it looks like it's been done. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 19:28, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you. I wasn't really expecting a peaceful resolution (considering the person was resorting to name calling and personal attacks), but was worth a try. IsraphelMac (talk) 19:31, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Have look on this potential Autobiography
This article seems to be an autobiography, have a look: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siddharth_Sivakumar