Talk:Constitution of Maine: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:15, 8 September 2015

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Law Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

United States Start‑class Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Maine Start‑class High‑importance

	Maine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaineWikipedia:WikiProject MaineTemplate:WikiProject MaineMaine articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I have removed the following from Art. I:

Now U.S. Supreme Court rulings take precedence on religious freedoms.

Federal Floor - State Ceiling. --Doug.^{(talk • contribs)} 22:33, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I added sections on the suppression of the text of parts of the constitution. It seems particularly important to include the full, original text of the section in controversy because it is very hard to locate online, and it should be available to all. It took me a couple of hours to find the appropriate version of the document in Google Books where I could get the OCR'ed text and then proofread that text; most people would not know how to track it down. Without taking a position on why it was suppressed, it seems good if the underlying data is online for all to see.

Usually I would not quote at such length from a source document, but this seems like a place to allow it. If you disagree, please discuss it here before deleting it. Note that the Constitution suppresses only the state printing the text, not any third party (which probably would run afoul of the U.S. 1st Amendment). Kcrca (talk) 19:14, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 Federal Floor - State Ceiling.  --[[User:Doug|Doug.]]<sup>([[User talk:Doug|talk]] <small>•</small> [[Special:Contributions/Doug|contribs]])</sup> 22:33, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
+I added sections on the suppression of the text of parts of the constitution. It seems particularly important to include the full, original text of the section in controversy because it is very hard to locate online, and it should be available to all. It took me a couple of hours to find the appropriate version of the document in Google Books where I could get the OCR'ed text and then proofread that text; most people would not know how to track it down. Without taking a position on why it was suppressed, it seems good if the underlying data is online for all to see.
+Usually I would not quote at such length from a source document, but this seems like a place to allow it. If you disagree, please discuss it here before deleting it. Note that the Constitution suppresses only the state printing the text, not any third party (which probably would run afoul of the U.S. 1st Amendment).
+[[User:Kcrca|Kcrca]] ([[User talk:Kcrca|talk]]) 19:14, 8 September 2015 (UTC)