Jump to content

Talk:Annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
VadimVMog (talk | contribs)
Line 38: Line 38:


Why do you archive all requests to change the word ''annexation'' in the title? Arguments are spread throughout several archives, making it impossible to keep track of what has been already said. No wonder people bring up this topic over and over, repeating themselves because you keep the talk page too clean. I'm not going to start a political debate, I just want to point something out regarding Wikipedia. This article is called ''annexation'' now. However, by moving the cursor over the corresponding articles in others languages, you can conclude without knowing any of these languages that ''crisis'' is the more common, if not the only word used in the titles of other language versions, including the Ukrainian one. Either the English article only covers the ''annexation'' part, not the whole crisis, which would be depicted elsewhere, and the links are removed, or it is advisable to reconsider the name of the article. --[[Special:Contributions/2.245.114.89|2.245.114.89]] ([[User talk:2.245.114.89|talk]]) 22:06, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Why do you archive all requests to change the word ''annexation'' in the title? Arguments are spread throughout several archives, making it impossible to keep track of what has been already said. No wonder people bring up this topic over and over, repeating themselves because you keep the talk page too clean. I'm not going to start a political debate, I just want to point something out regarding Wikipedia. This article is called ''annexation'' now. However, by moving the cursor over the corresponding articles in others languages, you can conclude without knowing any of these languages that ''crisis'' is the more common, if not the only word used in the titles of other language versions, including the Ukrainian one. Either the English article only covers the ''annexation'' part, not the whole crisis, which would be depicted elsewhere, and the links are removed, or it is advisable to reconsider the name of the article. --[[Special:Contributions/2.245.114.89|2.245.114.89]] ([[User talk:2.245.114.89|talk]]) 22:06, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
: Because some people don't like others to read, what [[annexation]] is. Politics. — [[User:VadimVMog|VadimVMog]] ([[User talk:VadimVMog|talk]]) 04:00, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:01, 17 October 2015

Crisis

Why do you archive all requests to change the word annexation in the title? Arguments are spread throughout several archives, making it impossible to keep track of what has been already said. No wonder people bring up this topic over and over, repeating themselves because you keep the talk page too clean. I'm not going to start a political debate, I just want to point something out regarding Wikipedia. This article is called annexation now. However, by moving the cursor over the corresponding articles in others languages, you can conclude without knowing any of these languages that crisis is the more common, if not the only word used in the titles of other language versions, including the Ukrainian one. Either the English article only covers the annexation part, not the whole crisis, which would be depicted elsewhere, and the links are removed, or it is advisable to reconsider the name of the article. --2.245.114.89 (talk) 22:06, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Because some people don't like others to read, what annexation is. Politics. — VadimVMog (talk) 04:00, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]