Jump to content

Talk:J. Walter Thompson: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Magog the Ogre moved page Talk:JWT to Talk:J. Walter Thompson: fix C&P move
not a stub
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Business|class=Stub|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Business|class=Start|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Graphic design|class=Stub}}
{{WikiProject Graphic design|class=Start}}
{{WikiProject Media|class=Stub}}
{{WikiProject Media|class=Start}}
{{WikiProject Companies}}
{{WikiProject Companies}}
}}
}}

Revision as of 12:59, 30 October 2015

Overview issues

The Overview section appears [1] to be an official biography and seriously lacking in NPOV. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.16.13.9 (talk) 17:37, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Sophruhig Vita@comcast.net (talk · contribs) - edited the overview section to read with neutral POV, as pointed out it read as promotional copy. Also edited for neutral POV in company history, and omitted some phrases that read like publicity without citation. Omitted bulleted items in "Pop Culture" section that did not have citations, and changed header of "Famous Campaigns" to "Notable Campaigns"

Add Detail in history

The previous section 'JWT was renamed...' left out one important detail that was on the page for the person himself, that being the company was not only renamed, but was purchased from Carleton and then renamed.ResponsibleRichard (talk) 16:33, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possible COI editing

This article has been edited by a number of registered accounts that, by their name, are associated with JWT and have only edited this, or associated pages:

agency network?

Before telling us that this is one of the biggest "agency networks", could someone tell the lay reader what an "agency network" is? A bit of searching suggests a network of insurance agencies or of advertising agencies could be called that. And while we're at it, the term "marketing communications brand" is not used every day by people who don't work in that field. 2601:2:4D00:27B:EC95:D98E:C834:5818 (talk) 20:40, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]