Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Di-Cypher: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
add protection template |
Comoncents85 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/United States of America|list of United States of America-related deletion discussions]]. <span style="border:2px solid #090E0E;padding:0px;"><font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#000000;">[[User:Musa Raza|Musa]]</font>[[User talk:Musa Raza|<font style="color:#000000;background:#00B6B3;"> Talk </font>]] </span> 14:18, 25 November 2015 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/United States of America|list of United States of America-related deletion discussions]]. <span style="border:2px solid #090E0E;padding:0px;"><font style="color:#FFFFFF;background:#000000;">[[User:Musa Raza|Musa]]</font>[[User talk:Musa Raza|<font style="color:#000000;background:#00B6B3;"> Talk </font>]] </span> 14:18, 25 November 2015 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Delete''': A [[:WP:SPA]] article on a company. Nothing on Highbeam or Questia, Google just returns the usual social media. A company going about its business; no [[:WP:CORPDEPTH|encyclopaedic notability]]. [[User:AllyD|AllyD]] ([[User talk:AllyD|talk]]) 19:03, 25 November 2015 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''': A [[:WP:SPA]] article on a company. Nothing on Highbeam or Questia, Google just returns the usual social media. A company going about its business; no [[:WP:CORPDEPTH|encyclopaedic notability]]. [[User:AllyD|AllyD]] ([[User talk:AllyD|talk]]) 19:03, 25 November 2015 (UTC) |
||
*'''Don't Delete''': A [[:WP:SPA]] article on a company. Nothing on Highbeam or Questia, Google just returns the usual social media. A company going about its business; no [[:WP:CORPDEPTH|encyclopaedic notability]]. [[User:Comoncents85|Comoncents85]] ([[User talk:comoncents85|talk]]) 20:45, 25 November 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 02:45, 26 November 2015
- Di-Cypher (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Heavily promotional article of a newly formed company of questionable notability. The sources are mainly primary (the companies own website, or self entries) with the only one of any interest (CNN) does not even mention the company. Claims are not supported by any reliable third party references. This article had been heavily tagged with issues (advert, coi, peacock, primary sources, one source, disputed) by more than one editor including a speedy by myself but the result was just a continuous deletion of tags without any attempt to address the issue. Tag deletion is not a reason for AfD I know just the timing.Peter Rehse (talk) 10:37, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 14:18, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 14:18, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: A WP:SPA article on a company. Nothing on Highbeam or Questia, Google just returns the usual social media. A company going about its business; no encyclopaedic notability. AllyD (talk) 19:03, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
- Don't Delete: A WP:SPA article on a company. Nothing on Highbeam or Questia, Google just returns the usual social media. A company going about its business; no encyclopaedic notability. Comoncents85 (talk) 20:45, 25 November 2015 (UTC)