Jump to content

Template:AfC submission/comments: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Implement [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation#Alt_proposal]
Modify non-notable wording per edit request and WikiProject discussion
Line 6: Line 6:
|news = This submission appears to be a news report of a single event and may not be notable enough for an article in Wikipedia. Please see [[Wikipedia:NOT#NEWS]] and [[Wikipedia:ONEEVENT]] for more information.<includeonly>{{safesubst:<noinclude />#ifeq:{{{cat|}}}|no||[[Category:AfC submissions declined as a news report on a single event]]}}</includeonly>
|news = This submission appears to be a news report of a single event and may not be notable enough for an article in Wikipedia. Please see [[Wikipedia:NOT#NEWS]] and [[Wikipedia:ONEEVENT]] for more information.<includeonly>{{safesubst:<noinclude />#ifeq:{{{cat|}}}|no||[[Category:AfC submissions declined as a news report on a single event]]}}</includeonly>
|plot = The proposed article is [[WP:NOT#PLOT|not suitable for Wikipedia]]. Because Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, articles on [[WP:FICT|fictional subjects]] should cover their real-world context and contain sourced analysis, offering detail on a work's development, impact or historical significance&mdash;not just a summary of the plot. You may wish to add this content to an existing article{{safesubst:<noinclude />#if:{{{2|}}}|, such as [[:{{{2}}}]]}}. As anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are free to do so yourself.<includeonly>{{safesubst:<noinclude />#ifeq:{{{cat|}}}|no||[[Category:AfC submissions declined as all plot]]}}</includeonly>
|plot = The proposed article is [[WP:NOT#PLOT|not suitable for Wikipedia]]. Because Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, articles on [[WP:FICT|fictional subjects]] should cover their real-world context and contain sourced analysis, offering detail on a work's development, impact or historical significance&mdash;not just a summary of the plot. You may wish to add this content to an existing article{{safesubst:<noinclude />#if:{{{2|}}}|, such as [[:{{{2}}}]]}}. As anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are free to do so yourself.<includeonly>{{safesubst:<noinclude />#ifeq:{{{cat|}}}|no||[[Category:AfC submissions declined as all plot]]}}</includeonly>
|film = This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability&mdash;see the [[WP:MOVIE|guidelines on the notability of films]] and [[WP:VRS|the golden rule]]. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]], and there is clear evidence of why the subject is [[WP:N|notable]] and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.<br /><u>What you can do</u>: Add citations <small>(see [[Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners]])</small> to secondary [[WP:IRS|reliable sources]] that are entirely independent of the subject.<includeonly>{{safesubst:<noinclude />#ifeq:{{{cat|}}}|no||[[Category:AfC submissions declined as a non-notable film]]}}</includeonly>
|film = This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires ''significant'' coverage about the subject in [[WP:RS|''reliable'' sources]] that are ''independent'' of the subject—see the [[WP:MOVIE|guidelines on the notability of films]] and [[WP:VRS|the golden rule]]. Please improve the submission's referencing <small>(see [[Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners]])</small>, so that the information is [[WP:V|verifiable]], and there is clear evidence of why the subject is [[WP:N|notable]] and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional ''reliable'' sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.<includeonly>{{safesubst:<noinclude />#ifeq:{{{cat|}}}|no||[[Category:AfC submissions declined as a non-notable film]]}}</includeonly>
|test = This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]] for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.<includeonly>{{safesubst:<noinclude />#ifeq:{{{cat|}}}|no||[[Category:AfC submissions declined as a test]]}}</includeonly>
|test = This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]] for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.<includeonly>{{safesubst:<noinclude />#ifeq:{{{cat|}}}|no||[[Category:AfC submissions declined as a test]]}}</includeonly>
|bio = This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability&mdash;see the [[WP:BIO|guidelines on the notability of people]] and [[WP:VRS|the golden rule]]. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]], and there is clear evidence of why the subject is [[WP:N|notable]] and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.<br /><u>What you can do</u>: Add citations <small>(see [[Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners]])</small> to secondary [[WP:IRS|reliable sources]] that are entirely independent of the subject.<includeonly>{{safesubst:<noinclude />#ifeq:{{{cat|}}}|no||[[Category:AfC submissions declined as a non-notable biography]]}}</includeonly>
|bio = This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires ''significant'' coverage about the subject in [[WP:RS|''reliable'' sources]] that are ''independent'' of the subject—see the [[WP:BIO|guidelines on the notability of people]] and [[WP:VRS|the golden rule]]. Please improve the submission's referencing <small>(see [[Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners]])</small>, so that the information is [[WP:V|verifiable]], and there is clear evidence of why the subject is [[WP:N|notable]] and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional ''reliable'' sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.<includeonly>{{safesubst:<noinclude />#ifeq:{{{cat|}}}|no||[[Category:AfC submissions declined as a non-notable biography]]}}</includeonly>
|redirect = This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Wizard-Redirects|Articles for creation/Wizard-Redirects]]. Thank you. <includeonly>{{safesubst:<noinclude />#ifeq:{{{cat|}}}|no||[[Category:AfC submissions declined as a redirect]]}}</includeonly>
|redirect = This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Wizard-Redirects|Articles for creation/Wizard-Redirects]]. Thank you. <includeonly>{{safesubst:<noinclude />#ifeq:{{{cat|}}}|no||[[Category:AfC submissions declined as a redirect]]}}</includeonly>
|essay = This submission reads more like an [[WP:NOTESSAY|essay]] than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in [[WP:PSTS|secondary, reliable sources]] and not contain opinions or [[WP:OR|original research]]. Please write about the topic from a [[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]] in an [[Wikipedia:Encyclopedic style|encyclopedic manner]].<includeonly>{{safesubst:<noinclude />#ifeq:{{{cat|}}}|no||[[Category:AfC submissions declined as an essay]]}}</includeonly>
|essay = This submission reads more like an [[WP:NOTESSAY|essay]] than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in [[WP:PSTS|secondary, reliable sources]] and not contain opinions or [[WP:OR|original research]]. Please write about the topic from a [[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]] in an [[Wikipedia:Encyclopedic style|encyclopedic manner]].<includeonly>{{safesubst:<noinclude />#ifeq:{{{cat|}}}|no||[[Category:AfC submissions declined as an essay]]}}</includeonly>
|nn = This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires ''significant'' coverage about the subject in [[WP:RS|''reliable'' sources]] that are ''independent'' of the subject—see the [[WP:GNG|general guideline on notability]] and [[WP:VRS|the golden rule]]. Please improve the submission's referencing <small>(see [[Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners]])</small>, so that the information is [[WP:V|verifiable]], and there is clear evidence of why the subject is [[WP:N|notable]] and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If no additional ''reliable'' sources can be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.<includeonly>{{safesubst:<noinclude />#ifeq:{{{cat|}}}|no||[[Category:AfC submissions declined as non-notable]]}}</includeonly>
|nn = This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires ''significant'' coverage about the subject in [[WP:RS|''reliable'' sources]] that are ''independent'' of the subject—see the [[WP:GNG|general guideline on notability]] and [[WP:VRS|the golden rule]]. Please improve the submission's referencing <small>(see [[Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners]])</small>, so that the information is [[WP:V|verifiable]], and there is clear evidence of why the subject is [[WP:N|notable]] and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional ''reliable'' sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.<includeonly>{{safesubst:<noinclude />#ifeq:{{{cat|}}}|no||[[Category:AfC submissions declined as non-notable]]}}</includeonly>
|web = This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability&mdash;see the [[WP:WEB|guidelines on the notability of websites]] and [[WP:VRS|the golden rule]]. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]], and there is clear evidence of why the subject is [[WP:N|notable]] and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.<br /><u>What you can do</u>: Add citations <small>(see [[Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners]])</small> to secondary [[WP:IRS|reliable sources]] that are entirely independent of the subject.<includeonly>{{safesubst:<noinclude />#ifeq:{{{cat|}}}|no||[[Category:AfC submissions declined as non-notable web content]]}}</includeonly>
|web = This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires ''significant'' coverage about the subject in [[WP:RS|''reliable'' sources]] that are ''independent'' of the subject—see the [[WP:WEB|guidelines on the notability of websites]] and [[WP:VRS|the golden rule]]. Please improve the submission's referencing <small>(see [[Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners]])</small>, so that the information is [[WP:V|verifiable]], and there is clear evidence of why the subject is [[WP:N|notable]] and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional ''reliable'' sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.<includeonly>{{safesubst:<noinclude />#ifeq:{{{cat|}}}|no||[[Category:AfC submissions declined as non-notable web content]]}}</includeonly>
|org
|org
|inc
|inc
|corp = This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability&mdash;see the [[WP:CORP|guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies]] and [[WP:VRS|the golden rule]]. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]], and there is clear evidence of why the subject is [[WP:N|notable]] and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.<br /><u>What you can do</u>: Add citations <small>(see [[Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners]])</small> to secondary [[WP:IRS|reliable sources]] that are entirely independent of the subject.<includeonly>{{safesubst:<noinclude />#ifeq:{{{cat|}}}|no||[[Category:AfC submissions declined as a non-notable organization]]}}</includeonly>
|corp = This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires ''significant'' coverage about the subject in [[WP:RS|''reliable'' sources]] that are ''independent'' of the subject—see the [[WP:CORP|guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies]] and [[WP:VRS|the golden rule]]. Please improve the submission's referencing <small>(see [[Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners]])</small>, so that the information is [[WP:V|verifiable]], and there is clear evidence of why the subject is [[WP:N|notable]] and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional ''reliable'' sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.<includeonly>{{safesubst:<noinclude />#ifeq:{{{cat|}}}|no||[[Category:AfC submissions declined as a non-notable organization]]}}</includeonly>
|music
|music
|m
|m
|band = This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability&mdash;see the [[WP:MUSIC|guidelines on the notability of music-related topics]] and [[WP:VRS|the golden rule]]. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]], and there is clear evidence of why the subject is [[WP:N|notable]] and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.<br /><u>What you can do</u>: Add citations <small>(see [[Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners]])</small> to secondary [[WP:IRS|reliable sources]] that are entirely independent of the subject.<includeonly>{{safesubst:<noinclude />#ifeq:{{{cat|}}}|no||[[Category:AfC submissions declined as a non-notable musical topic]]}}</includeonly>
|band = This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires ''significant'' coverage about the subject in [[WP:RS|''reliable'' sources]] that are ''independent'' of the subject—see the [[WP:MUSIC|guidelines on the notability of music-related topics]] and [[WP:VRS|the golden rule]]. Please improve the submission's referencing <small>(see [[Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners]])</small>, so that the information is [[WP:V|verifiable]], and there is clear evidence of why the subject is [[WP:N|notable]] and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional ''reliable'' sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.<includeonly>{{safesubst:<noinclude />#ifeq:{{{cat|}}}|no||[[Category:AfC submissions declined as a non-notable musical topic]]}}</includeonly>
|d
|d
|dict = Wikipedia is an [[encyclopedia]] and [[WP:DICT|not a dictionary]]. We cannot accept articles that are little more than definitions of words or abbreviations as entries. A good article should ''begin'' with a good definition, but expand on the subject. Please try creating an article at [[wikt:Main Page|Wiktionary]] instead.<includeonly>{{safesubst:<noinclude />#ifeq:{{{cat|}}}|no||[[Category:AfC submissions declined as a dictionary definition]]}}</includeonly>
|dict = Wikipedia is an [[encyclopedia]] and [[WP:DICT|not a dictionary]]. We cannot accept articles that are little more than definitions of words or abbreviations as entries. A good article should ''begin'' with a good definition, but expand on the subject. Please try creating an article at [[wikt:Main Page|Wiktionary]] instead.<includeonly>{{safesubst:<noinclude />#ifeq:{{{cat|}}}|no||[[Category:AfC submissions declined as a dictionary definition]]}}</includeonly>
Line 34: Line 34:
|advert = This submission appears to [[WP:ARTSPAM|read more like an advertisement]] than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]], and should refer to a range of [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|independent, reliable, published sources]], not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiability policy]] and the [[Wikipedia:Notability|notability]] of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.<includeonly>{{safesubst:<noinclude />#ifeq:{{{cat|}}}|no||[[Category:AfC submissions declined as an advertisement]]}}</includeonly>
|advert = This submission appears to [[WP:ARTSPAM|read more like an advertisement]] than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]], and should refer to a range of [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|independent, reliable, published sources]], not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiability policy]] and the [[Wikipedia:Notability|notability]] of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.<includeonly>{{safesubst:<noinclude />#ifeq:{{{cat|}}}|no||[[Category:AfC submissions declined as an advertisement]]}}</includeonly>
|prof
|prof
|academic = This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability&mdash;see the [[Wikipedia:Notability (academics)|guidelines for academics]] and [[WP:VRS|the golden rule]]. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]], and there is clear evidence of why the subject is [[WP:N|notable]] and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.<br /><u>What you can do</u>: Add citations <small>(see [[Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners]])</small> to secondary [[WP:IRS|reliable sources]] that are entirely independent of the subject.<includeonly>{{safesubst:<noinclude />#ifeq:{{{cat|}}}|no||[[Category:AfC submissions declined as a non-notable academic topic]]}}</includeonly>
|academic = This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires ''significant'' coverage about the subject in [[WP:RS|''reliable'' sources]] that are ''independent'' of the subject—see the [[Wikipedia:Notability (academics)|guidelines for academics]] and [[WP:VRS|the golden rule]]. Please improve the submission's referencing <small>(see [[Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners]])</small>, so that the information is [[WP:V|verifiable]], and there is clear evidence of why the subject is [[WP:N|notable]] and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional ''reliable'' sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.<includeonly>{{safesubst:<noinclude />#ifeq:{{{cat|}}}|no||[[Category:AfC submissions declined as a non-notable academic topic]]}}</includeonly>
|sport
|sport
|athlete = This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability&mdash;see the [[Wikipedia:Notability (sports)|guidelines for sports persons and athletes]] and [[WP:VRS|the golden rule]]. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]], and there is clear evidence of why the subject is [[WP:N|notable]] and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.<br /><u>What you can do</u>: Add citations <small>(see [[Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners]])</small> to secondary [[WP:IRS|reliable sources]] that are entirely independent of the subject.<includeonly>{{safesubst:<noinclude />#ifeq:{{{cat|}}}|no||[[Category:AfC submissions declined as a non-notable athletic topic]]}}</includeonly>
|athlete = This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires ''significant'' coverage about the subject in [[WP:RS|''reliable'' sources]] that are ''independent'' of the subject—see the [[Wikipedia:Notability (sports)|guidelines for sports persons and athletes]] and [[WP:VRS|the golden rule]]. Please improve the submission's referencing <small>(see [[Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners]])</small>, so that the information is [[WP:V|verifiable]], and there is clear evidence of why the subject is [[WP:N|notable]] and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional ''reliable'' sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.<includeonly>{{safesubst:<noinclude />#ifeq:{{{cat|}}}|no||[[Category:AfC submissions declined as a non-notable athletic topic]]}}</includeonly>
|neo = [[Wikipedia:Avoid neologisms|Neologisms]] are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|independent, reliable, published sources]]. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.<includeonly>{{safesubst:<noinclude />#ifeq:{{{cat|}}}|no||[[Category:AfC submissions declined as a neologism]]}}</includeonly>
|neo = [[Wikipedia:Avoid neologisms|Neologisms]] are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|independent, reliable, published sources]]. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.<includeonly>{{safesubst:<noinclude />#ifeq:{{{cat|}}}|no||[[Category:AfC submissions declined as a neologism]]}}</includeonly>
|notenglish
|notenglish

Revision as of 22:26, 10 December 2015

{{{1}}}