Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Music theory/Members: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Pluto6520 (talk | contribs)
94 edits
Pluto6520 (talk | contribs)
94 edits
No edit summary
Line 41: Line 41:
# {{User|MidnightPhoenix7}}
# {{User|MidnightPhoenix7}}
# {{User|Xavier enc}} (In the past 18 years I have come to learn just about every subject related to music. Music theory is one subject with high regard for me. I want to help on '''all''' subjects. P.S. I have been reading WP articles since WP's birth and I am truly sorry I have not joined sooner. I am '''very''' active now.) 00:46, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
# {{User|Xavier enc}} (In the past 18 years I have come to learn just about every subject related to music. Music theory is one subject with high regard for me. I want to help on '''all''' subjects. P.S. I have been reading WP articles since WP's birth and I am truly sorry I have not joined sooner. I am '''very''' active now.) 00:46, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
⚫
# {{User|Pluto6520}}


===Occasional participants===
===Occasional participants===
Line 48: Line 47:
# [[User: Evertype|Evertype]] (interested in notation, chiefly) 01:23, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
# [[User: Evertype|Evertype]] (interested in notation, chiefly) 01:23, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
# [[User: Rburtonresearch|Rburtonresearch]] (interested in the perceptual elements of sound and music) 05:05, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
# [[User: Rburtonresearch|Rburtonresearch]] (interested in the perceptual elements of sound and music) 05:05, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
⚫
# {{User|Pluto6520}}


===Former and inactive participants ===
===Former and inactive participants ===

Revision as of 04:52, 1 January 2016

Active participants

<!-- New entries go at the bottom. Entry format:

  1. Name (talk · contribs) (I am interested in working on...) 15:08, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that it is "User|" not "User:" and five tildes at the end, not four. -->

  1. Ninja Wizard (talk · contribs)
  2. LtPowers (talk · contribs) 19:20, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. jmclark (talk · contribs)
  4. Feline Hymnic (talk · contribs) (Interested in article readability for beginners, consistency of article structures, etc.) 16:29, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Niklas R (talk · contribs) (i'm mostly on svwp, but will gladly pitch in here as often as possible)
  6. theadorerex (talk · contribs) (I'm into some of the 20th century theory, like set theory and Neo-Riemannian, and I would love to make those articles more readable for beginners) 20:50, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  7. violarulez (talk · contribs) (interested in romantic and 20th century periods.)19:44, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Ace of Spades (talk · contribs) (Can pitch in wherever I'm needed) 16:33, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Mahlerlover1 (talk · contribs) 00:18, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  10. kosboot (talk · contribs) (Schenker-related material and general history of music theory)
  11. Devin.chaloux (talk · contribs) (Interested in Romantic and early 20th century American music, Schenker, Form, Grundgestalt, and making articles readable for audiophiles.)
  12. Toddlertoddy (talk · contribs) (Disambig pages) 21:35, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Justlettersandnumbers (talk · contribs) (JLAN for short). History of music theory, treatises, performance practice, C18 French tempo etc.
  14. Jerome Kohl (talk · contribs) (Medieval, Renaissance, and 20th-century theory) 22:20, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Jeffrey Blinks (talk · contribs) (Interested in Medieval through Romantic Theory) 04:45, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Hearfourmewesique (talk · contribs) (Interested in establishing convention for naming chords, progressions, scales etc. in a way that should be as intuitive as possible) 18:56, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  17. BobbyBoykin (talk · contribs) (Accuracy, Simplicity, Accessibility) 14:15, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Double sharp (talk · contribs) 03:28, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Dominiktesla (talk · contribs) 16:34 19 May 2012 (UTC)
  20. Maniacal Lemon (talk · contribs) (Accuracy, Citing, Stubs, and Pages that don't exist) 03:30, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  21. CPGACoast (talk · contribs) &ndash; CPGACoast (talk) 17:19, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Fauban (talk · contribs) (Interested in common practice, impressionist, and jazz harmony; also interested in unifying criteria and merging pages) 14:19, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Kiefer.Wolfowitz (talk · contribs) <big>(</big>A mathematical statistician teaching himself guitar and fundamentals of music, especially tonal harmony: guitar tunings (regular tuning, repetitive tuning, major-thirds tuning of Ralph Patt, new standard tuning of Robert Fripp's Guitar Craft); guitar chord. I'd like to learn fundamentals of scales and key signatures. I can help with mathematical and statistical questions.)<big></big>
  24. Geomusica (talk · contribs) (Guitar theory on fretboards is three-dimensional!-I have full mappings freely available at myspace.com/geomusica and would love to get it confirmed by others)09:13, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Tal Brenev (talk · contribs) (Interested in musical form, harmony, and classical music theory)
  26. AndrewVerbus (talk · contribs) (Interested in contributing in any way I can) 03:29, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  27. JBailhe (talk · contribs) (Jacques Bailhé - accuracy, simplicity, clarity)--Jbailhe 21:21, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Hucbald.SaintAmand (talk · contribs) (History of theory from the Middle Ages to Schenker; Schenkerian theory and analysis; Theories of modality) 09:03, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  29. haganR (talk · contribs) (I am interested in publishing a work on Wikipedia. It is a method of showing the relationship of the Major scale to the more complex 'Jazz' scales using a 'Cycle of Fifths' methodology. I have posted the charts describing this system on the Jazz Guitar forum, Theory Subsection, but think that Wikipedia would be more appropriate) 15:35, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  30. BassHistory (talk · contribs) (I am interested in cleaning up the more crucial articles, some reorganizing, introducing better sources, basically getting everything up to the level of an encyclopedia and making it useful)
  31. IsaacMalitz (talk · contribs) (I am interested in providing cutting-edge perspective on music theory topics. For instance, limitations of analysis/theory that models music as notes. I will need some guidance where and how to fit in to this Project.) 15:08, 18 April 2915(UTC)19:35, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
  32. MidnightPhoenix7 (talk · contribs)
  33. Xavier enc (talk · contribs) (In the past 18 years I have come to learn just about every subject related to music. Music theory is one subject with high regard for me. I want to help on all subjects. P.S. I have been reading WP articles since WP's birth and I am truly sorry I have not joined sooner. I am very active now.) 00:46, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Occasional participants

  1. Phembree (interested counterpoint, harmony, 20th/21st century music, music cognition, electronic music, and more...) 01:19, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. bgranat (Question: Is this a typo? In the I-vi-ii-V turnaround with approach chords in G, the notation seems to be for D# Major 7, not D#7. Thanks for clarifying. I don't know how else to ask this question other than post here. This is the URL in question: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Approach_chord [User: bgranat; Date: August 4, 2013]..) 18:27, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
  3. Evertype (interested in notation, chiefly) 01:23, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Rburtonresearch (interested in the perceptual elements of sound and music) 05:05, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Pluto6520 (talk · contribs)

Former and inactive participants

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Music_theory/Members&oldid=697688823"